The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 295 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
eviivo 表现出色 在 customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 Vacation Rentals & Villas 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Integrated Payment Processing and Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
Vertical Booking 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 295 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 256 | 39 |
在分析了 295 条经验证的评价后,eviivo 用户最看重其 支持和入职体验, 易于使用且界面直观, 全面的功能集,而 Vertical Booking 用户则强调 客户支持, 通道连通性, 集成平台。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持和入职体验
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
易于使用且界面直观
▾
|
+
通道连通性
▾
|
|
+
全面的功能集
▾
|
+
集成平台
▾
|
|
+
节省时间的好处
▾
|
+
定制
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
−
用户界面
▾
|
|
−
技术和显示问题
▾
|
−
设置与培训
▾
|
|
−
定价和订阅
▾
|
−
API 文档
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 66 条评价 | #23 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 21 条评价 | #21 14 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 5 条评价 | #12 8 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 2 条评价 | #18 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #9 38 条评价 | #19 19 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #8 42 条评价 | #18 17 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #9 24 条评价 | #25 6 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 25 条评价 | #20 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #6 21 条评价 | #8 20 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 194 条评价 | #20 10 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #25 1 条评价 | #20 1 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #20 2 条评价 | #8 8 条评价 |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ CM and Vertical Booking Synchro Channel Manager boils down to your hotel’s specific needs. Both products aim to streamline online distribution and revenue management, but they approach this differently.
eviivo’s platform is an all-in-one solution, primarily designed for small to medium-sized properties, vacation rentals, and B&Bs. Vertical Booking offers a more integrated, flexible system that combines CRS, Booking Engine, and Channel Manager, often favored by larger hotels and chains. Which aligns better with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans?
eviivo boasts a significantly higher review count—231 reviews with recent feedback in the last six months—making it the more thoroughly vetted choice. Its overall rating is 0/5, but this appears to be a scoring anomaly; in contrast, Vertical Booking’s reviews are fewer (36 total), with a current rating of 4.57/5, reflecting more recent, positive feedback.
Both products facilitate online distribution, but eviivo emphasizes ease of use and time savings through its single-click OTA connectivity. Vertical Booking’s system is built for real-time synchronization across multiple channels, with an advanced focus on revenue management. Are you prioritizing a more user-friendly, established platform, or a robust, flexible system for complex rate and availability management?
If your hotel needs a simple, reliable channel management system tailored to small properties, vacation rentals, or B&Bs, go with eviivo. Its extensive feature set (15 unique features) and high user satisfaction make it ideal for operators seeking straightforward, scalable solutions with minimal setup complexity.
If your hotel requires a highly customizable, integrated platform capable of handling multiple properties, complex rate rules, and detailed synchronization, Vertical Booking is the better pick. Its platform offers seamless connectivity with over 69 partners, including CRS, booking engine, and GDS integrations, suitable for larger or expanding hotels aiming for precise revenue control.
eviivo’s intuitive interface consistently receives praise, with a 4.65/5 ease-of-use rating based on 231 reviews. Users highlight its straightforward navigation, quick onboarding, and helpful support, making it accessible even for less tech-savvy staff.
Vertical Booking also scores well for usability, with a 4.42/5 rating, though some users note interface improvements could be made, especially on the booking engine side. Support responsiveness is a common positive, but initial setup can be complex for new users.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo offers 15 features exclusive to its platform, including PMS connectivity, bulk updates, real-time 2-way integrations, inventory management, multi-lingual support, and detailed analytics dashboards. Its comprehensive feature set supports multi-property management and rate optimization.
Vertical Booking, however, focuses on synchronization, availability, and rate adjustments across channels with fewer built-in features—its strength lies in its automation and flexibility rather than extensive tools. If you need advanced management features, eviivo’s broader set edges out.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s customer support scores are notably higher—4.78/5—supported by reviews praising their quick, friendly, and personalized assistance. Users frequently mention the value of onboarding and ongoing support, emphasizing the importance of attentive service.
Vertical Booking’s support scores 4.46/5, with positive reviews about their responsiveness, though some users note delays and occasional communication issues, particularly in the US market.
Edge: eviivo.
Vertical Booking connects to 69 verified partners, nearly double eviivo’s 32, including major OTAs, GDS, and PMS systems. Its extensive list supports diverse connectivity needs, particularly for larger hotels with complex distribution channels.
eviivo’s integrations focus on leading OTAs and booking platforms, with 32 verified partners, including notable names like Expedia and Tripadvisor. Its integrations are robust but fewer in number.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
eviivo’s high review count (231 reviews) with recent feedback underscores a solid reputation, especially among vacation rentals, B&Bs, and small hotel operators. Its reviews frequently mention ease of use, time savings, and support.
Vertical Booking’s reviews (36 total) are more recent and highly positive, especially from larger properties and chains, with specific praise for its flexibility and integration capabilities.
Given the volume and recency, eviivo’s overall rating is more reliable and indicates higher satisfaction.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo charges a flat monthly fee of $700, with no additional implementation or setup costs. Its transparent pricing model is straightforward for small to medium properties.
Vertical Booking’s pricing is not publicly listed, making direct comparison difficult. Typically, larger hotels and chains should expect tiered costs based on features and integrations, which can vary.
Not ideal if your hotel needs highly advanced revenue management tools or extensive customization.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, plug-and-play solution or limited integrations.
eviivo excels in delivering a user-friendly, well-rated platform with extensive support and ease of use, making it ideal for small to medium properties and vacation rentals. Its high review count and recent positive feedback reinforce its strength in customer satisfaction.
Vertical Booking provides a highly flexible, robust system suited for larger hotels and chains that need advanced synchronization, customization, and a broader partner network. Its integration capabilities and real-time control make it a compelling choice for growth-focused properties, despite a slightly steeper learning curve.
In conclusion, if your hotel values simplicity, support, and proven satisfaction, eviivo is the clear choice. For more complex management needs and larger portfolios, Vertical Booking’s extensive integrations and flexibility justify its selection.
渠道经理 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,eviivo Suite™ CM 和 Vertical Booking (Synchro Channel Manager) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 批量更新和多重限制 | ||
| 支持每周和每月费率 | ||
| 收益规则 | ||
| 通道自映射 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 3 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了Eviivo提供的卓越支持和新用户引导体验,尤其赞扬了客服人员在简化过渡和设置流程方面所发挥的作用。支持团队以其快速、清晰的帮助而著称,这对... 许多评论都强调了Eviivo提供的卓越支持和新用户引导体验,尤其赞扬了客服人员在简化过渡和设置流程方面所发挥的作用。支持团队以其快速、清晰的帮助而著称,这对于确保运营顺畅至关重要。
用户对Eviivo直观易用的平台赞不绝口,该平台简化了预订和渠道管理,即使是不懂技术的用户也能轻松上手。预订、渠道和设置方面的便捷导航显著减少了管理工作。
Eviivo的多种功能,例如多物业管理和集中运营控制,备受好评。用户表示这些功能节省了时间并优化了日常管理,但也有一些用户希望获得更多自定义选项。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然该平台在桌面端的使用体验备受好评,但一些评论批评其移动网站操作繁琐,应用程序缺乏直观性,导致用户在移动中管理预订时面临诸多挑战。
部分用户最初遇到了一些技术问题,例如显示错误,但他们表示这些问题在获得技术支持后很快就得到了解决。用户认为持续的技术改进将有利于整个平台的提升。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户服务因其响应迅速、专业和以解决方案为导向而获得积极反馈,尽管一些用户注意到延迟和可用性问题,特别是在美国市场。
人们经常提到与多个 OTA 和 GDS 的强大连接,但一些用户报告了初始设置的问题以及 PMS 和 OTA 偶尔出现的同步问题。
Vertical Booking 的一体化平台结合了 CRS、渠道管理器和预订引擎,因简化各种酒店管理任务和提高整体运营效率而受到高度赞誉。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多用户认为界面很简单,但有些人建议进行改进,以实现更直观的导航和视觉增强,特别是对于预订引擎。
初始设置和培训因其全面性而受到普遍赞赏,尽管由于时间安排或复杂性而存在一些挑战,尤其是对于新用户而言。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ CM 和 Vertical Booking (Synchro Channel Manager) 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ CM 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Vertical Booking (Synchro Channel Manager) 提供 69 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ CM 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ CM:否。Vertical Booking (Synchro Channel Manager):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 85,Vertical Booking 的为 15。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问