The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 231 条经验证的评价后,Exely 用户最看重其 user interface, 客户支持, hotel operation efficiency,而 innRoad 用户则强调 用户界面和可用性, 预订管理, 自定义报告。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User Interface
▾
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
Hotel Operation Efficiency
▾
|
+
自定义报告
▾
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
+
磁带图表和费率管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
自定义和报告功能
▾
|
−
系统性能和更新
▾
|
|
−
系统性能和速度
▾
|
−
自定义报告
▾
|
|
−
移动应用
▾
|
−
定制
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #23 16 条评价 | #7 101 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #17 15 条评价 | #10 36 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #16 3 条评价 | #5 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #11 1 条评价 | #6 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #22 13 条评价 | #8 70 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #20 11 条评价 | #9 34 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #25 2 条评价 | #11 20 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #21 3 条评价 | #12 12 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 2 条评价 | #6 166 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | #24 2 条评价 | #21 4 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 28 条评价 | #21 1 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 5 条评价 | #19 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel management software can significantly influence your operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. Both Exely HMS and innRoad All-in-1 HMS aim to streamline your hotel’s processes but approach this goal differently. While Exely emphasizes automation, online reputation, and direct booking tools, innRoad focuses on ease of use, channel management, and comprehensive reservation features.
Given your hotel’s needs, understanding how these two products compare across key areas will be crucial. Are you looking for a platform with more recent user validation and broader regional presence or one that offers more integrations and features? Let’s explore.
Exely and innRoad both aim to optimize hotel operations, yet their strengths differ. Exely’s core appeal lies in its focus on revenue growth through direct bookings, reputation management, and automation tools, making it suitable for hotels aiming to control their brand and online presence. Conversely, innRoad offers a more expansive feature set with robust channel management, reservations, and guest communication, appealing to properties that prioritize operational efficiency and visibility.
Exely’s recent reviews (18 in the last six months) and higher overall ratings (81.7 HT score, 4.72/5 overall) demonstrate stronger current user satisfaction. innRoad’s 148 reviews, but none recent, suggest its reputation has stabilized but lacks new validation. Are you prioritizing recent support and performance or the broad feature set?
If your hotel needs a platform with a strong focus on increasing direct bookings, managing online reputation, and automating guest communications, Exely is your better option. Its higher ratings (4.72/5, 81.7 HT score) and recent positive reviews indicate a satisfied user base, especially among boutique and city-center hotels.
However, if your goal is to streamline reservations, improve channel distribution, and access a broader array of features—especially in a multi-channel environment—innRoad's extensive feature set (48 exclusive features) and proven track record with independent hotels make it the more suitable choice. Its user-friendly interface and heavy focus on channel management make it ideal for properties seeking quick operational gains.
Exely receives a near-perfect usability rating of 4.88/5, with reviews praising its intuitive design and simple integration into daily workflows. Users highlight its easy setup and responsive support, making onboarding faster and staff adoption smoother. Its interface’s simplicity enables your team to quickly learn and operate the system, reducing training time.
innRoad, while also rated high (4.47/5), is praised for its user-friendliness but has some UI and navigation areas flagged for potential improvement. Its support and onboarding are robust, but the learning curve may be slightly steeper for some staff.
Edge: Exely.
innRoad offers an extensive suite, with 48 exclusive features like a booking engine, channel manager, credit-card processing, mobile check-in, and multi-channel integration. These features facilitate operational automation, guest engagement, and revenue optimization in ways Exely does not currently match.
Exely provides 9 unique features including native email marketing, payment requests, and guest feedback management, but its core strength is in automation and reputation management. If your hotel values a broad set of features, innRoad’s extensive list gives it an edge; for targeted automation and marketing, Exely’s focused tools could suffice.
Edge: innRoad.
Exely’s support ranks at an impressive 4.9/5, with recent reviews emphasizing their responsiveness, helpfulness, and continuous improvements. Guests appreciate their quick responses and proactive communication, which translates to fewer operational hiccups.
innRoad also maintains high support ratings at 4.48/5, with users praising their 24/7 availability and dedicated support team. However, some reviews mention occasional communication delays. Given the recent positive feedback for Exely’s support, it holds the edge here.
Edge: Exely.
innRoad’s ecosystem includes 34 verified partners, covering major OTAs, payment gateways, PMS integrations, and more. Shared integrations like Booking.com and Oracle Hospitality suggest broad connectivity, with many unique partners such as Quickbooks, Revinate, and Mews expanding its reach.
Exely, with only 8 verified partners, has fewer integrations but covers essential channels and tools. If your hotel relies heavily on third-party integrations, innRoad’s extensive partner network offers more flexibility.
Edge: innRoad.
Exely’s recent reviews (18 in the last six months) and a review rating of 4.72/5 reflect higher current satisfaction, especially among boutique and city-center hotels. Its NPS score of 9.83/10 indicates strong user loyalty, with 98% likelihood to recommend.
innRoad, with 148 reviews but no recent feedback, maintains a solid 4.72/5 rating but lacks the recency to validate ongoing performance. Hotels in small, independent segments consistently praise innRoad’s ease of use and support, but Exely’s recent review activity signals stronger modern validation.
Edge: Exely.
Exely’s flat-rate pricing is $400/month, with no hidden fees, implementation costs, or trial options. Its straightforward pricing aligns well with hotels seeking predictable expenses.
innRoad’s pricing is higher at $600/month, also with no hidden fees, but includes more features and integrations. The choice depends on whether your hotel values extensive features (innRoad) or a leaner, cost-effective approach (Exely).
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Exely is a streamlined, revenue-focused system with a growing reputation, high recent reviews, and excellent support. Its core strengths lie in automation, reputation management, and direct booking tools, appealing to boutique and city-center hotels aiming to strengthen online presence.
innRoad offers a broader feature set, especially in channel management and reservation automation, making it ideal for independent hotels needing an all-in-one, flexible platform. Its extensive integrations and proven track record support operational efficiency and revenue growth.
If your hotel values recent validation and targeted automation, Exely’s the clear choice. For a comprehensive, feature-rich solution with deep channel management, innRoad is more suitable.
Note: Based on current review activity and ratings, Exely’s overall user confidence is stronger.
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
The intuitive and straightforward interface of Exely significantly enhances user experience, making it easier for staff to navigate during busy period... The intuitive and straightforward interface of Exely significantly enhances user experience, making it easier for staff to navigate during busy periods and integrating seamlessly into daily operations.
客户支持团队因其快速响应和乐于助人而受到赞扬,确保任何问题都能得到迅速解决,但这并非Exely独有的特点,而是一个更普遍的特点。
Exely is praised for streamlining hotel operations, reducing errors and enhancing overall workflow efficiency by automating various processes and task... Exely is praised for streamlining hotel operations, reducing errors and enhancing overall workflow efficiency by automating various processes and tasks.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户表示需要更高级的报告选项和自定义功能,以便进行更深入的性能分析和个性化的用户体验,而这些在当前的系统中是缺乏的。
有批评指出,该系统在高峰工作负载期间的性能存在问题,报告称加载时间过长、偶尔出现错误以及意外注销阻碍了操作流程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然 Innroad 总体上是用户友好的,但 UI 和导航等某些方面可以更加直观。这些方面的改进将使新用户受益,并使日常操作更加高效。
Innroad 直观的预订管理系统简化了整个预订流程。它提供全面的数据访问,使员工能够高效地处理多房间预订和客人信息。
24/7 客户支持因其可用性和所提供帮助的质量而受到称赞。然而,一些用户报告称,偶尔会遇到沟通和解决速度方面的困难。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户提到频繁更新有时会降低系统性能,影响生产力。尽管更新带来好处,但建议更高效地推出并尽量减少干扰。
一些评论呼吁改进自定义报告功能。用户建议提供更详细、可自定义的报告选项,以便更深入地了解客户行为和运营指标。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely HMS 和 innRoad All-in-1 HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely HMS 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad All-in-1 HMS 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely HMS:否。innRoad All-in-1 HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 82,innRoad 的为 27。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问