The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 302 条经验证的评价后,Exely 用户最看重其 user interface, 客户支持, hotel operation efficiency,而 RMS 用户则强调 支持团队, 用户界面, operational streamlining。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User Interface
▾
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
+
Hotel Operation Efficiency
▾
|
+
Operational Streamlining
▾
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
+
OTA和渠道管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
自定义和报告功能
▾
|
−
定制功能
▾
|
|
−
系统性能和速度
▾
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
|
−
移动应用
▾
|
−
账单和发票
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #23 16 条评价 | #6 124 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #17 15 条评价 | #6 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #16 3 条评价 | #12 6 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 1 条评价 | #2 7 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #22 13 条评价 | #6 79 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #20 11 条评价 | #8 39 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #25 2 条评价 | #7 38 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #21 3 条评价 | #5 52 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 2 条评价 | #9 56 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #24 2 条评价 | #13 16 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 28 条评价 | #11 6 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 5 条评价 | #13 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel management software can significantly impact your operations, revenue, and guest satisfaction. Both Exely HMS and RMS aim to streamline hotel management, but they approach this goal differently. Exely offers a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with a focus on direct bookings and online reputation, while RMS provides a broader, scalable system with extensive automation and multi-property management. Your decision hinges on what your hotel needs most—specialized tools or a versatile, multi-property solution.
Both products serve different hotel segments, but RMS’s larger user base and more recent reviews give it a current edge in credibility. Are you prioritizing deep integration with third-party channels or a specialized all-in-one platform?
Exely HMS and RMS are both designed to reduce administrative burdens and boost revenue, but they solve slightly different problems. Exely emphasizes direct booking growth, online reputation, and a user-friendly interface, making it ideal for boutique and city center hotels focused on online presence. RMS, on the other hand, tackles multi-property operations with extensive automation and integrations, suitable for larger chains or hotels managing multiple locations.
Where they diverge most is in their feature sets: Exely’s focus is on website development and rate shopping, while RMS offers a comprehensive suite including a channel manager, guest CRM, and revenue management. Their design philosophies reflect their target users—Exely for hotels seeking direct growth, RMS for those with complex operations. Does your team need a platform that emphasizes online booking and reputation, or one that manages multiple properties more efficiently?
If your hotel primarily needs a straightforward, intuitive PMS with a strong online booking engine and reputation management, Exely’s user feedback suggests it’s the better choice. Its recent reviews highlight ease of use and excellent customer support, making onboarding smoother for boutique or city hotels.
RMS is better suited if your hotel operates multiple properties or requires advanced automation, real-time reporting, and extensive integrations. Its larger user base and more recent reviews underscore its robustness, especially for enterprise-level hotels or chains seeking scalability and detailed revenue management. For a small hotel focused on direct bookings, Exely is ideal; for multi-property portfolios, RMS clearly leads.
Exely scores higher in ease of use, with a rating of 4.88/5 and 48 reviews, most praising its intuitive interface and simple onboarding. Users appreciate how quickly staff adapt and how seamlessly it integrates into daily operations, supported by a solid onboarding rating of 4.82/5. Many reviews mention how it simplifies complex workflows, especially for smaller teams.
In contrast, RMS’s user ratings are slightly lower at 4.3/5 with 224 reviews, reflecting some frustration with its extensive features and occasional performance hiccups. Users report a steeper learning curve and more challenges during updates but still value its automation capabilities.
Edge: Exely HMS.
Exely offers 36 shared features with RMS but has only 2 unique features—website development and rate shopping modules—highlighting its niche focus. RMS boasts 38 features exclusive to it, including a channel manager, POS, revenue management, guest CRM, automated night audit, and more, aimed at larger, multi-property operations.
RMS’s vast feature set covers every aspect of hospitality management, from real-time reporting to shift planning, while Exely’s specialized features support growth in online visibility and direct bookings. If you need a broad, multi-functional system, RMS has the edge; if your focus is on increasing direct bookings and website control, Exely provides targeted tools.
Edge: RMS.
Exely’s customer support is highly rated at 4.9/5 with 48 reviews, many praising its responsiveness and knowledgeable staff. Review quotes highlight the ease of contacting support and continuous improvements, which help resolve issues swiftly.
RMS also receives strong support ratings at 4.52/5 with 224 reviews, though some users note that support responsiveness can vary. Many appreciate the helpfulness and availability of their support team but mention occasional delays during software updates.
Edge: Exely.
RMS has a clear advantage with 112 verified partners, including major names like Criton, Sage, and STR, alongside shared integrations such as Oracle Hospitality. The extensive list covers revenue management, POS, payment processing, and online channel management, making it highly adaptable for larger hotels.
Exely’s 8 verified partners include Hotellab, Booking.com, and Clock, with a focus on core functionalities like website development and rate shopping. It's suitable for hotels that want essential integrations but not a complex ecosystem.
Edge: RMS.
RMS’s overall rating of 4.56/5 from 224 reviews surpasses Exely’s 0/5 rating from 48 reviews, giving RMS a current advantage in user satisfaction. RMS’s recent reviews emphasize its scalability, automation, and revenue improvements, especially for multi-property portfolios.
Exely’s reviews are more limited and primarily focus on ease of use and support, with no recent reviews to challenge RMS’s standing. The larger, more recent review count for RMS makes its high ratings more reliable.
Edge: RMS.
Exely’s pricing is $400 per month with no additional implementation or trial fees, offering a clear and straightforward cost structure. RMS charges $700 per month, also without implementation fees or trials, reflecting its broader feature set and scalability.
While RMS is more expensive, its extensive automation and multi-property management justify the higher price for larger operations. Smaller hotels may find Exely’s price point more appealing if their focus is on direct bookings and reputation management.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
RMS offers a comprehensive, scalable platform suited for larger operations and chains, with an extensive feature set and broad integrations. Its recent reviews reflect high satisfaction with automation, multi-property handling, and revenue growth.
Exely excels in its simplicity, user-friendliness, and targeted tools for direct booking and online reputation management. It’s the better choice for boutique hotels or properties prioritizing website control and quick onboarding.
If your hotel needs multi-property management, advanced automation, and extensive integrations, RMS is the clear winner. However, for smaller hotels focused on online presence and direct bookings, Exely provides a straightforward, well-supported solution.
In conclusion, RMS’s larger review base and current ratings give it a decisive edge for most hotels managing multiple properties or seeking extensive automation. Conversely, if your hotel’s primary focus is on growing direct bookings with an easy-to-use system, Exely is the more fitting choice.
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
The intuitive and straightforward interface of Exely significantly enhances user experience, making it easier for staff to navigate during busy period... The intuitive and straightforward interface of Exely significantly enhances user experience, making it easier for staff to navigate during busy periods and integrating seamlessly into daily operations.
客户支持团队因其快速响应和乐于助人而受到赞扬,确保任何问题都能得到迅速解决,但这并非Exely独有的特点,而是一个更普遍的特点。
Exely is praised for streamlining hotel operations, reducing errors and enhancing overall workflow efficiency by automating various processes and task... Exely is praised for streamlining hotel operations, reducing errors and enhancing overall workflow efficiency by automating various processes and tasks.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户表示需要更高级的报告选项和自定义功能,以便进行更深入的性能分析和个性化的用户体验,而这些在当前的系统中是缺乏的。
有批评指出,该系统在高峰工作负载期间的性能存在问题,报告称加载时间过长、偶尔出现错误以及意外注销阻碍了操作流程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队的响应速度和问题解决能力备受好评。客户高度赞赏他们积极主动地解决问题以及在系统操作方面提供的帮助。
RMS Cloud 以其用户友好的界面而著称,简化了操作流程,缩短了员工培训时间。这种简化对于高效运营至关重要,尤其是在快节奏的工作环境中。
RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users apprec... RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users appreciate its role in enabling real-time coordination among various departments, thereby enhancing efficiency and guest experience.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
许多用户称赞该平台的自定义功能,允许他们调整入住流程和其他操作,以更好地满足自身需求。然而,一些评论指出,自定义报告功能需要改进。
尽管 RMS Cloud 提供多种报告,但用户反映报告自定义和访问某些设置方面存在困难。如果能改进这方面,就能简化生成可用于决策的实用信息的过程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely HMS 和 RMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely HMS 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RMS 提供 112 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely HMS:否。RMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 82,RMS 的为 87。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问