项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 442 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Exely 表现出色 在 ease of use and daily hotel operations 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment Requests and Native Email Marketing.
ThinkReservations 表现出色 在 customer support and responsiveness 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Real Time Reporting and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 442 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $400/月 | 起价 $1,100/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 88 | 354 |
在分析了 442 条经验证的评价后,Exely 用户最看重其 ease of use and daily hotel operations, 支持响应能力和合作伙伴关系, 定制化和工作流程灵活性,而 ThinkReservations 用户则强调 customer support and responsiveness, 欺诈预防和拒付保护, 预订管理和预订操作。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of use and daily hotel operations
▾
|
+
Customer support and responsiveness
▾
|
|
+
支持响应能力和合作伙伴关系
▾
|
+
欺诈预防和拒付保护
▾
|
|
+
定制化和工作流程灵活性
▾
|
+
预订管理和预订操作
▾
|
|
+
性能、可靠性和稳定性
▾
|
+
定制和配置
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告、分析和财务可见性
▾
|
−
报告灵活性
▾
|
|
−
账单、发票和付款处理
▾
|
−
移动应用及稳定性
▾
|
|
−
价格和费用上涨
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #23 16 条评价 | #4 129 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #17 15 条评价 | #5 15 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #16 3 条评价 | #2 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #11 1 条评价 | #1 1 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #22 13 条评价 | #4 92 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #20 11 条评价 | #5 72 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #25 2 条评价 | #4 22 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #21 3 条评价 | #9 8 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 2 条评价 | #1 332 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #24 2 条评价 | #36 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 28 条评价 | #24 0 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 5 条评价 | #20 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Exely HMS by Exely and ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both aim to streamline property management and increase revenue, but they differ significantly in features, regional presence, and user feedback. Your decision should align with your property size, target market, and desired level of customization.
Exely’s recent reviews and higher overall scores suggest it’s gaining ground, but ThinkReservations’ larger review count and broader OTA integrations make it a formidable contender. Which platform truly fits your hotel’s growth plan?
Both Exely and ThinkReservations target independent hotels, small chains, and boutique properties, aiming to automate operations and boost direct bookings. Exely emphasizes revenue growth through advanced channel management and reputation tools, while ThinkReservations offers a more comprehensive suite with strong upselling and revenue management features.
Where they diverge is in regional presence and feature set: Exely has a wider international footprint and some unique features like native email marketing and online checkout, whereas ThinkReservations provides a broader selection of integrations and a more extensive set of operational tools. Are you prioritizing regional coverage or depth of integrations?
If your hotel needs a platform with a global reach, robust channel management, and a focus on direct booking growth, Exely is the better pick. Its intuitive interface and continuous improvements make it suitable for boutique hotels and properties aiming to elevate their online presence.
Conversely, if your hotel values extensive booking and revenue management features, seamless OTA integration, and a user-friendly interface, ThinkReservations should be your choice. Its strong upselling tools and detailed reporting suit small to medium properties focused on maximizing revenue and operational efficiency.
In summary, choose Exely if international presence and reputation management are critical; go with ThinkReservations if your focus is on detailed revenue control and easy integration.
Both platforms are rated highly for ease of use, with Exely at 4.88/5 and ThinkReservations at 4.8/5. Exely’s onboarding process is slightly more praised for its helpful support and intuitive interface, making staff adoption smoother.
ThinkReservations’ interface is known for its simplicity and quick learning curve, especially for staff familiar with reservations and property management. However, with 312 reviews compared to Exely’s 48, the latter’s recent feedback indicates a more consistent user experience.
Edge: Exely.
Exely offers 6 features unique to its platform, including native email marketing, online checkout, and guest feedback management—tools that support direct marketing and guest engagement. ThinkReservations boasts 11 exclusive features, such as real-time reporting, drag-and-drop tap chart, and integrated payment terminals, emphasizing operational control.
Shared features total 32, but if you seek features like automated assignments, shift planning, or PCI compliance, ThinkReservations provides a broader operational toolkit. For marketing-focused features, Exely’s unique offerings stand out.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Exely’s customer support scores at 4.9/5 with reviews highlighting responsive and attentive service, with many users noting quick issue resolution and ongoing improvements. Review quotes praise their continuous support and proactive updates.
ThinkReservations, with a 4.79/5 rating, is also highly rated for support, but some reviews mention slower responses during peak times. Its support team is described as friendly and knowledgeable, but Exely’s more recent review count and scores suggest slightly stronger support.
Edge: Exely.
ThinkReservations offers 16 verified integrations, including major OTAs like Airbnb, Expedia, and TripAdvisor, along with advanced tools like TrustYou and INTELITY. Exely supports 8 verified partners, including industry staples like Booking.com and Oracle Hospitality.
If your hotel relies heavily on diverse OTA and POS integrations, ThinkReservations provides a wider ecosystem, simplifying channel management and operational workflows. For specific niche integrations, Exely’s selection may suffice.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations has a significantly larger review base with 312 recent reviews and an average rating of 4.88/5, favored especially by small and independent properties. Users praise its ease of use, revenue features, and support, with comments like “It was the best of times” and “like adding another employee to our business.”
Exely’s ratings are lower overall (81.7 HTR Score, 0/5 overall rating) with only 48 reviews, but recent feedback emphasizes its intuitive interface and ongoing improvements. For newer reviews, ThinkReservations remains the more trusted choice.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Exely is priced at a flat $400 monthly fee, with no implementation or trial costs. ThinkReservations charges $1,100 monthly, also without implementation fees or trials.
While Exely offers a more affordable entry point, its pricing is straightforward. ThinkReservations’ higher cost reflects its broader feature set and larger integration ecosystem, potentially providing more value depending on your hotel’s needs.
Not ideal if you need extensive operational tools like shift planning or real-time reporting, as these are limited.
Not ideal if your hotel operates in regions where Exely’s broader international presence is preferred.
Exely’s core advantage is its focus on direct bookings, reputation management, and international reach, making it ideal for boutique hotels and properties aiming to grow their online presence. Its user interface and support ratings suggest a reliable choice for hotels seeking a platform that evolves with their needs.
ThinkReservations excels in operational features, OTA integrations, and revenue management, making it perfect for small and independent hotels that want an all-in-one solution to optimize revenue and streamline daily tasks. Its extensive set of operational tools and broad integrations support a variety of hotel types.
If your hotel needs advanced marketing tools and international coverage, go with Exely. If your priority is revenue control, OTA management, and ease of use, ThinkReservations is the better choice.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $400/月 | 起价 $1,100/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客沟通(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 家政 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用程序 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
| 宾客留言 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 家政 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 客房服务手机应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班规划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放式磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 定价情报 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| SOC2投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 全天候在线支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| 销售点 |
我们分析了 11 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
"I became aware of ThinkReservations at a trade show in the US, and I could see right away that it would help Blue Tang Inn streamline our operations, increase our booking and upsel..."
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
"ThinkReservations Digital Registration has streamlined our check in process, making my job so much easier. Being able to ask guests for their ID and credit card ahead of time, agre..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We try to take care of all the needs of our guests so that they have an experience rather than just a stay"
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Exely is consistently described as intuitive, simple, and easy for hotel teams to learn quickly. Reviewers say it streamlines front-desk workflows suc... Exely is consistently described as intuitive, simple, and easy for hotel teams to learn quickly. Reviewers say it streamlines front-desk workflows such as reservations, check-in, and booking handling, making day-to-day operations more organized and efficient.
许多评论都称赞Exely的支持团队响应迅速、指导周到,并展现出卓越的服务意识。用户经常将该公司描述为设置和日常运营中值得信赖的合作伙伴,一些用户还特别提到... 许多评论都称赞Exely的支持团队响应迅速、指导周到,并展现出卓越的服务意识。用户经常将该公司描述为设置和日常运营中值得信赖的合作伙伴,一些用户还特别提到市场营销团队或本地团队提供的帮助。
用户反复提出的一个问题是,他们需要在表单、发票、预订和界面选项等方面提供更灵活的、针对特定房源的定制化功能。他们希望 Exely 能够更好地处理团体预订编辑... 用户反复提出的一个问题是,他们需要在表单、发票、预订和界面选项等方面提供更灵活的、针对特定房源的定制化功能。他们希望 Exely 能够更好地处理团体预订编辑、发票模板、支付流程以及其他操作上的特殊情况,而无需任何变通方案。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户重视报表功能,因为它能提供日常运营的可见性和清晰的佣金追踪,但许多用户也希望获得更高级的分析和定制功能。常见的需求包括实时报表、更深入的绩效分析、... 用户重视报表功能,因为它能提供日常运营的可见性和清晰的佣金追踪,但许多用户也希望获得更高级的分析和定制功能。常见的需求包括实时报表、更深入的绩效分析、更完善的损益工具以及更灵活的报表格式,方便管理层使用。
用户评价显示,计费流程固然重要,但并非总能完全满足酒店实际运营的需求。用户特别希望改进发票格式、简化团体预订编辑流程、合并房费和服务费账单,以及简化支... 用户评价显示,计费流程固然重要,但并非总能完全满足酒店实际运营的需求。用户特别希望改进发票格式、简化团体预订编辑流程、合并房费和服务费账单,以及简化支付方式设置。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Users repeatedly highlight ThinkReservations' knowledgeable, courteous, and fast support team. Reviewers say the team is easy to work with, stays with... Users repeatedly highlight ThinkReservations' knowledgeable, courteous, and fast support team. Reviewers say the team is easy to work with, stays with them until issues are resolved, and is especially helpful during urgent or emergency situations.
ThinkReservations的一大亮点在于其对欺诈性预订和被盗信用卡的处理方式。评论者指出,它能够快速解决问题,为合法持卡人退款,并增加管控措施以降低未来拒付风... ThinkReservations的一大亮点在于其对欺诈性预订和被盗信用卡的处理方式。评论者指出,它能够快速解决问题,为合法持卡人退款,并增加管控措施以降低未来拒付风险。
ThinkReservations 经常被誉为一款可靠的预订系统,能够高效管理预订。评论者提到,它有助于简化预订咨询、预订流程以及整体酒店预订操作。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
部分用户希望对报表拥有更多控制权,他们认为目前的报表过于死板,缺乏足够的自定义选项。他们更倾向于更深入的数据查询,以及能够精确选择要报表显示的字段。
一篇评论批评了 iOS 版的使用体验,认为原生应用比目前的网页版更好。该用户还反映偶尔会出现卡顿和加载界面死机的情况,表明移动端的可用性和稳定性还有待提高... 一篇评论批评了 iOS 版的使用体验,认为原生应用比目前的网页版更好。该用户还反映偶尔会出现卡顿和加载界面死机的情况,表明移动端的可用性和稳定性还有待提高。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely HMS 和 ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely HMS 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Exely HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely HMS:否。ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 87,ThinkReservations 的为 85。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐