项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 1,387 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Yanolja Cloud Solution 在易于使用且界面友好方面表现出色,尤其适合房车营地与露营地住宿设施(5.0/5),并拥有在前提等独家功能。
HOTELTIME 在工作流程效率与易用性方面表现出色,尤其适合房车营地与露营地住宿设施(4.8/5),并拥有交付过程以及客户关系管理等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 1,387 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $100/月 | 起价 $600/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 822 | 565 |
在分析了 1,387 条经验证的评价后,Yanolja Cloud Solution 用户最看重其 易于使用且界面友好, 可靠性和效率提升, integration and real-time synchronization,而 HOTELTIME 用户则强调 工作流程效率与易用性, 支持与响应速度, 预订与房态管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且界面友好
▾
|
+
工作流程效率与易用性
▾
|
|
+
可靠性和效率提升
▾
|
+
支持与响应速度
▾
|
|
+
Integration and real-time synchronization
▾
|
+
预订与房态管理
▾
|
|
+
POS系统性能
▾
|
+
报告与分析
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析功能增强
▾
|
−
账单、发票和会计
▾
|
|
−
高级功能请求
▾
|
−
客人档案与客人数据管理
▾
|
|
−
移动应用性能
▾
|
−
房价管理与定价控制
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 493 条评价 | #5 224 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 172 条评价 | #3 238 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 15 条评价 | #3 51 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #34 1 条评价 | #8 7 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #3 264 条评价 | #4 248 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 417 条评价 | #3 246 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 133 条评价 | #4 145 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | #4 49 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #16 45 条评价 | #52 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #25 17 条评价 | #2 384 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #1 632 条评价 | #5 117 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #4 15 条评价 | #1 21 条评价 |
Choosing between Yanolja Property Management System and HotelTime PMS hinges on your specific operational needs and priorities. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they approach this goal differently. While Yanolja offers a robust on-premise solution with a focus on integration and control, HotelTime emphasizes a versatile, cloud-based platform with extensive features. Which aligns better with your hotel's infrastructure and growth plans?
Yanolja's solution is ideal if your hotel values full control over data, local server dependency, and a strong integration ecosystem. Conversely, HotelTime’s cloud approach suits properties seeking flexibility, real-time access from anywhere, and ongoing system updates. Are you ready to dive deeper into the comparison?
Yanolja Property Management System is an on-premise solution designed to give hotels complete control over their data and operations. It integrates seamlessly with channel managers, POS, and other systems, reducing manual input and preventing overbookings.
HotelTime PMS, on the other hand, is a cloud-based platform that offers similar core functionalities plus a broader set of features tailored to diverse hotel types. It emphasizes accessibility from any location, automatic updates, and a scalable architecture suitable for small to large properties.
Both products are highly rated, but Yanolja boasts a higher review count (662 reviews) and more recent feedback, providing a stronger snapshot of current user satisfaction. Which platform’s approach aligns better with your hotel’s operational philosophy?
If your hotel needs full data control, local network stability, and robust integration, go with Yanolja. Its on-premise setup is perfect for properties that prioritize security and customizability, especially in regions with unreliable internet.
If you require a flexible, cloud-based system with rapid deployment, scalability, and extensive automation, HotelTime is the better choice. It’s suitable for hotels that want to access real-time data from multiple locations and benefit from regular updates and new features.
Yanolja’s strengths lie in its integration ecosystem and control, making it ideal for tech-savvy properties with existing infrastructure. HotelTime excels in ease of access, continuous innovation, and a broad feature set that adapts to various property sizes and types.
Yanolja’s user interface has received praise for its intuitiveness, with a 4.77/5 ease of use rating. Many users note that staff adoption is quick due to its centralized, straightforward design, and the onboarding process is rated 4.71/5.
HotelTime’s platform is also rated highly for usability at 4.66/5, with reviews emphasizing its user-friendly interface and simple navigation. Its onboarding process is slightly lower, at 4.63/5, but users commend its support during implementation.
Edge: Yanolja. Given its higher overall ease of use rating and more recent positive reviews, Yanolja is currently favored for user-friendliness.
Yanolja offers a concise, all-in-one on-premise system with 1 exclusive feature: on-premise deployment. It covers core hotel operations like reservations, billing, and OTA management but lacks many advanced modules.
HotelTime boasts a much broader feature set with 51 unique features, including EPoS, guest CRM, integrated CRS, payment processing, housekeeping, group management, online check-in, and revenue management tools. These features support advanced operational needs and guest engagement strategies.
While Yanolja’s core is streamlined for control and integration, HotelTime provides more specialized tools for operational automation and guest relationship management. For property owners seeking extensive functionality, HotelTime’s greater feature count provides a decisive edge.
Edge: HotelTime. Its wide array of features, especially in automation and guest engagement, surpasses Yanolja’s more limited scope.
Yanolja’s support team consistently receives high praise, with a 4.79/5 rating. Review quotes highlight dedicated support and smooth onboarding, with users appreciating the assistance in navigating complex integrations.
HotelTime’s support ratings are slightly lower at 4.73/5, but reviews describe their team as responsive and helpful, especially during initial setup and ongoing support. Customers value the training and guidance provided, although some suggest extending support hours.
Edge: Yanolja. Its higher recent support rating and positive user comments put it slightly ahead, indicating more reliable assistance.
Yanolja offers 157 verified integrations, including Xero, QuickBooks, and multiple channel managers, with 21 shared partners. Its extensive partner network supports diverse financial, marketing, and distribution tools.
HotelTime provides 58 verified integrations, with notable shared partners like STAAH, RateGain, and AeroGuest. Its focus remains on core hotel functions and popular third-party tools, but it offers fewer options overall.
For hotels prioritizing extensive third-party connectivity, Yanolja’s larger integration ecosystem offers more flexibility and options.
Edge: Yanolja. Its significantly higher number of verified partnerships makes it the preferred choice for comprehensive integration needs.
Yanolja has a slightly lower overall rating at 4.25/5, but it’s important to note it has more recent reviews, strengthening its data reliability. Its user base spans various hotel types, with a notable 32% of users in the luxury segment.
HotelTime’s ratings are higher at 4.83/5, with recent reviews from 27 hotels, mainly in Europe and the Middle East. It’s especially favored by boutique and city-center hotels, which rate it highly for usability and support.
Given the recency and volume of reviews, Yanolja’s rating reflects current satisfaction levels more accurately.
Edge: Yanolja. Its larger review base and recent feedback provide a clearer picture of performance, favoring it slightly.
Yanolja’s pricing starts at $100 per month, with no trial or implementation fees, making it a cost-effective choice for hotels seeking control and on-premise deployment.
HotelTime’s pricing begins at $600 per month, with no free trial or additional costs disclosed. Its higher price reflects its broader feature set and cloud infrastructure.
Consider your budget and operational preferences when choosing. If cost efficiency and control are priorities, Yanolja’s lower price is attractive; for more features and flexibility, HotelTime’s higher fee may be justified.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on remote access or prefers a SaaS model for easy scalability.
Not ideal if your hotel requires an on-premise system due to security policies or local regulations.
Yanolja provides a comprehensive on-premise PMS ideal for hotels that value control, integration, and security. Its robust ecosystem and recent user feedback make it a reliable choice for sophisticated properties.
HotelTime offers a flexible, cloud-based platform with a broad feature set tailored to diverse hotel environments. Its ease of access, automation, and continuous innovation serve properties seeking agility and modern tech.
Choose Yanolja if your priority is infrastructure control and integration; opt for HotelTime if you need flexibility, scalability, and frequent updates. Both are excellent, but your specific requirements will determine the better fit.
This detailed comparison aims to guide your decision-making based on current data, reviews, and your hotel’s operational style.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $100/月 | 起价 $600/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了该系统的用户友好型设计,这使得新员工能够轻松上手,快速掌握使用方法。直观的界面简化了日常操作,尤其是在预订和计费流程方面。
Yanolja 因其可靠性而备受赞誉,用户称赞其系统稳健可靠,能够提升部门效率和准确性。该平台在简化前台和收益管理方面的支持尤其受到重视。
Users praise Yanolja for its seamless integration of PMS, Channel Manager, POS, and Booking Engine, enabling efficient operations through real-time up... Users praise Yanolja for its seamless integration of PMS, Channel Manager, POS, and Booking Engine, enabling efficient operations through real-time updates that prevent overbookings and ensure inventory accuracy. The integration notably simplifies reservation handling and outlet billing.
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
虽然该系统在运行效率方面表现出色,但用户经常要求提供更高级的报告选项和可自定义的仪表板,以便更好地监控性能并支持决策过程。
用户期待某些高级功能,例如 WhatsApp 发票和更深入的 CRM 集成,能够进一步增强与客户的沟通和运营效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
评论中的一个共同主题是,HotelTime通过简洁直观的工作流程,减少了前台、收银和多部门操作的日常工作量。即使用户整体评价系统,也有人指出,过多的点击、弹窗... 评论中的一个共同主题是,HotelTime通过简洁直观的工作流程,减少了前台、收银和多部门操作的日常工作量。即使用户整体评价系统,也有人指出,过多的点击、弹窗或繁琐的编辑流程可能会拖慢员工速度,使培训或高峰期操作变得比必要的更困难。
用户经常提到HotelTime的支持团队是其主要优势,描述为响应迅速、联系方便、专业,且常能立即解决问题。多篇评论表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间,使PMS在日常... 用户经常提到HotelTime的支持团队是其主要优势,描述为响应迅速、联系方便、专业,且常能立即解决问题。多篇评论表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间,使PMS在日常运营中更易依赖,尤其是在前台或财务工作中酒店需要快速答复时。
评测者一致认为 HotelTime 在预订创建、编辑、房间可用性和房间块管理方面操作简便、速度快。该 PMS 被视为一款提升预订准确性、支持团队预订、帮助员工实时管理... 评测者一致认为 HotelTime 在预订创建、编辑、房间可用性和房间块管理方面操作简便、速度快。该 PMS 被视为一款提升预订准确性、支持团队预订、帮助员工实时管理入住率的工具,从而减少错误并加快前台工作流程。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
许多评价强调HotelTime的账单和开票流程是其实际优势,特别是在预付款单、发票、单据匹配和收银工作方面。然而,用户也指出在发票编辑、过账日记账、拆分账单、... 许多评价强调HotelTime的账单和开票流程是其实际优势,特别是在预付款单、发票、单据匹配和收银工作方面。然而,用户也指出在发票编辑、过账日记账、拆分账单、押金、货币处理和会计对账方面存在一些摩擦,表明这是一个价值很高但流程复杂的环节。
一小部分但重要的评论涉及客人档案的处理,包括偏好存储、重复档案、客人历史和与文件关联的数据。用户希望拥有更丰富的客人档案,以及更清晰的合并或搜索操作,... 一小部分但重要的评论涉及客人档案的处理,包括偏好存储、重复档案、客人历史和与文件关联的数据。用户希望拥有更丰富的客人档案,以及更清晰的合并或搜索操作,以便员工能更快地为回头客提供服务,而无需创建重复记录或进行额外的手动清理。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Yanolja Property Management System 和 HotelTime PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Yanolja Property Management System 提供 155 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HotelTime PMS 提供 60 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Yanolja Property Management System 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Yanolja Property Management System:否。HotelTime PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Yanolja Cloud Solution 的 HT Score 为 92,HOTELTIME 的为 92。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐