项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 82 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Shiji Group 在客户支持和培训方面表现出色,尤其适合长住住宿设施(4.9/5),并拥有移动友好以及客人历史等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 82 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 联系销售 | 起价 $100/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 82 |
在分析了 82 条经验证的评价后,myHotel 用户最看重其 ,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 客户支持和培训, 顾客调查和问卷, 集中式审查和反馈管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持和培训
▾
|
|
|
+
顾客调查和问卷
▾
|
|
|
+
集中式审查和反馈管理
▾
|
|
|
+
回复管理和审核
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析仪表板
▾
|
|
|
−
可用性和导航
▾
|
|
|
−
与点评网站和在线旅行社的整合
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 声誉管理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | — | #18 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 22 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 31 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 15 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #7 26 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #6 29 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #7 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #7 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #9 5 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #9 32 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #5 6 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #3 12 条评价 |
Fidelity Online by myHotel and Shiji Reviewpro Reputation both address online reputation management but diverge sharply in capability and market presence. Fidelity Online offers a freemium model that extracts reviews from up to three OTAs and competitors at no cost, primarily serving smaller or budget-conscious hotels that need basic review aggregation without extensive features. In contrast, Shiji Reviewpro is a comprehensive platform with over 80 integrated review sites, AI-powered response automation, and competitive benchmarking, targeting properties that require deeper operational insights and multi-property management.
Both systems solve the core problem of consolidating guest feedback from multiple channels to help hotels monitor and respond to reviews efficiently. However, Shiji Reviewpro's advanced analytics and workflow tools go beyond aggregation to influence operational decisions, while Fidelity Online remains focused on providing free access to review data with limited functionality and no published pricing or onboarding support.
If you operate a small independent hotel or a limited-service property looking for a no-cost method to collect guest reviews from major OTAs and a handful of competitors, Fidelity Online’s freemium model fits this need. Its free access to review extraction across Facebook, Google, TripAdvisor, Expedia Group, and Booking can provide basic reputation visibility without financial commitment. However, this recommendation is based on limited data as no verified reviews or pricing details exist for Fidelity Online.
Conversely, if your property is a mid-size or large hotel, resort, or branded chain requiring comprehensive reputation management across multiple platforms with in-depth reporting, AI-driven review response, and competitive benchmarking, Shiji Reviewpro’s 4.4/5 rating from 82 reviews and 40 recent ones supports its operational maturity. Its integrations with 72 verified partners, including OTAs, PMS, and revenue management systems, cater to diverse workflows and multi-property environments. This makes it the preferred choice for hotels that want to translate feedback into measurable service improvements and revenue growth.
Ease of use and onboarding are critical for front desk staff and management adoption. Shiji Reviewpro scores 4.4/5 for ease of use and 4.2/5 for onboarding, reflecting user satisfaction with its intuitive dashboard and mobile applications. Reviewers praise clear visibility and navigation, although some mention a learning curve due to the platform’s extensive features.
Fidelity Online lacks any reviews or ratings on ease of use or onboarding, leaving its usability unverified. Without comparative user feedback, claims about simplicity cannot be substantiated.
Edge: Even.
Shiji Reviewpro offers 44 hotel-specific features absent in Fidelity Online, which currently lists no unique features beyond basic review extraction. Shiji’s capabilities include AI-generated reply automation, in-stay surveys, case and workflow management, multi-property access, sentiment analysis, social media integrations (WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger), and competitive benchmarking. These features transform review management from passive aggregation into proactive guest experience enhancement and operational accountability.
Fidelity Online’s value proposition centers on free extraction of reviews from 20+ channels but does not provide features such as automated replies, survey customization, or integrated analytics, limiting its operational impact beyond basic monitoring.
Edge: Shiji Reviewpro Reputation.
Shiji Reviewpro holds a 4.3/5 customer support rating with onboarding rated 4.2/5, supported by 82 recent reviews. Users frequently highlight responsive and knowledgeable support teams, citing timely issue resolution and helpful account management. One review notes room for improvement in personalized account manager assignment and documentation clarity but overall praises the support experience.
Fidelity Online has no publicly available customer support ratings or user feedback, making it impossible to evaluate service quality or responsiveness objectively.
Edge: Even.
Shiji Reviewpro supports 72 verified integrations, including prominent partners like SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, IDeaS, Duetto, Amadeus, and Mews, enabling seamless data flow between reputation management, PMS, CRS, and revenue systems. These integrations facilitate automated workflows such as review response, guest messaging, and revenue reporting, vital for hotels managing multiple platforms or properties.
Fidelity Online lists only 2 verified partners—SiteMinder and Cloudbeds—which limits its interoperability and ability to integrate reputation insights into broader hotel operations.
Edge: Shiji Reviewpro Reputation.
Fidelity Online has no verified reviews or ratings on Hotel Tech Report, meaning no user consensus or satisfaction data exists. Shiji Reviewpro holds an overall 4.4/5 rating based on 82 reviews, with a notably higher last-six-months rating of 4.8/5 from 40 reviews, indicating recent improvements or sustained quality. It also has an 88% likelihood to recommend among users.
Segment-specific ratings for Shiji Reviewpro range from 4.2/5 for limited-service and budget hotels (11 reviews) up to 4.9/5 for extended stay and serviced apartments (7 reviews), showing strong acceptance across property types. Boutique hotels, branded hotels, city center hotels, and resorts all rate it above 4.3/5, confirming broad applicability.
Edge: Even.
Fidelity Online does not publish any pricing information and offers no trial or freemium beyond its free extraction of reviews from 3 OTAs and 3 competitors. This model suggests it targets hotels with minimal budgets or those wanting to test reputation management impact before committing financially.
Shiji Reviewpro starts at a base price of $100 per month without a freemium or trial. Pricing is likely tiered by property size, features, or portfolio complexity, though detailed pricing beyond the base is not public.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Fidelity Online by myHotel and Shiji Reviewpro Reputation both serve the reputation management category but occupy distinct segments. Fidelity Online provides free, limited review extraction ideal for small hotels testing reputation insights, while Shiji Reviewpro delivers an enterprise-grade solution with AI, analytics, and extensive integrations supporting complex hotel operations.
Choose Fidelity Online if your hotel is small, cost-sensitive, and only needs basic review aggregation from a few OTAs and competitors without additional operational tools. This choice rests on the freemium model and simplicity but comes with no verified user feedback or support assurance.
Choose Shiji Reviewpro Reputation if your property demands a scalable reputation platform with advanced features like AI-generated responses, multi-property management, and comprehensive integrations. Its 4.4/5 rating across 82 reviews and strong recent feedback confirm its suitability for hotels aiming to convert guest feedback into operational improvements and revenue growth.
声誉管理 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | — | 起价 $100/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Surveys & Feedback
|
|
|
| 短信短信 | ||
| 情绪分析 | ||
| 客人满意度调查 | ||
| 响应式调查 | ||
| 回顾鼓励 | ||
| 电子邮件提醒 | ||
| 可定制的问题 | ||
| 条件逻辑 | ||
| 分段调查 | ||
| 入住期间调查 | ||
|
▾
Review Generation
|
|
|
| Tripadvisor 点评合作伙伴 | ||
| 短信短信 | ||
| 工作流程管理 | ||
| 回复评论 | ||
| 回顾鼓励 | ||
|
▾
Follow-up & Resolution
|
|
|
| AI 生成的回复自动化 | ||
| 工作流程管理 | ||
| 回复评论 | ||
| 警报和通知 | ||
| 票务系统 | ||
| 入住期间调查 | ||
| 案例管理 | ||
|
▾
Reporting, Analytics & Insights
|
|
|
| 情绪分析 | ||
| 收入报告 | ||
| 竞争情报 | ||
| 企业报告 | ||
| 报告仪表板 | ||
| 竞争基准测试 | ||
| 部门级报告 | ||
|
▾
Channels
|
|
|
| 社交媒体 | ||
| Tripadvisor | ||
| Booking.com | ||
| 谷歌 | ||
|
▾
Admin & Settings
|
|
|
| 多物业管理 | ||
| 移动辅助功能 |
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Our Guest Experience Specialist no longer spends valuable time manually monitoring and responding to feedback across multiple platforms."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
用户普遍认为该平台的客服响应迅速、知识渊博且乐于助人,客户经理和支持团队确实能带来价值。即使平台受到批评,评论者通常也会将这些问题与客服质量区分开来,... 用户普遍认为该平台的客服响应迅速、知识渊博且乐于助人,客户经理和支持团队确实能带来价值。即使平台受到批评,评论者通常也会将这些问题与客服质量区分开来,同时他们也希望平台能提供更好的培训资源和更本地化的文档。
用户重视 ReviewPro 的调查工具,因为它能够收集住客入住后的反馈,并将其直接整合到声誉管理流程中。然而,一些评论提到,调查问卷的编辑、布局自定义和模板灵... 用户重视 ReviewPro 的调查工具,因为它能够收集住客入住后的反馈,并将其直接整合到声誉管理流程中。然而,一些评论提到,调查问卷的编辑、布局自定义和模板灵活性略显僵化或受限。
用户经常表示,ReviewPro 将来自多个渠道的评论和宾客反馈整合到一个平台,简化了日常监控,并帮助团队更快地发现趋势和问题。这种整合被视为提升酒店或度假村声... 用户经常表示,ReviewPro 将来自多个渠道的评论和宾客反馈整合到一个平台,简化了日常监控,并帮助团队更快地发现趋势和问题。这种整合被视为提升酒店或度假村声誉管理和宾客体验的有效途径。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
许多评论者都强调仪表盘和报告功能是其核心优势,因为它们能让用户一目了然地了解业绩、满意度和需要改进的方面。同时,一些用户希望获得功能更强大的PDF报告、... 许多评论者都强调仪表盘和报告功能是其核心优势,因为它们能让用户一目了然地了解业绩、满意度和需要改进的方面。同时,一些用户希望获得功能更强大的PDF报告、更清晰的评分解释以及更多可自定义的酒店特定KPI指标。
多位评测者表示,该平台直观易用,便于日常监测,尤其是在设置完成后。另一些评测者则指出,由于功能众多,某些功能可能难以找到,而且界面和问卷编辑功能还有提... 多位评测者表示,该平台直观易用,便于日常监测,尤其是在设置完成后。另一些评测者则指出,由于功能众多,某些功能可能难以找到,而且界面和问卷编辑功能还有提升空间,使其更加人性化。
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Fidelity Online 和 Shiji Reviewpro Reputation 共享许多核心 Reputation Management 功能,但各有独特的能力。Fidelity Online 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Reviewpro Reputation 提供 72 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
Fidelity Online:否。Shiji Reviewpro Reputation:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Reputation Management 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。myHotel 的 HT Score 为 0,Shiji Group 的为 83。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐