The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 370 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Xi Ruan Westsoft 表现出色 .
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
基于 HTR 上 370 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 370 |
在分析了 370 条经验证的评价后,Xi Ruan Westsoft 用户最看重其 ,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #21 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can make or break your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both Xi Ruan Westsoft’s FoxHis and Stayntouch aim to streamline hotel management, but they serve very different needs and market positions. While FoxHis offers AI-driven insights tailored for smaller or less-established hotels, Stayntouch provides a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with a proven track record among larger hotels and chains. Which product aligns better with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans?
FoxHis by Xi Ruan Westsoft is a management platform that emphasizes AI insights and operational streamlining, often targeting smaller or less established properties. However, it lacks publicly available reviews, a broad feature set, and regional presence, making its real-world effectiveness hard to verify.
Stayntouch, by contrast, boasts over 317 reviews with a recent review count of 26, reflecting current user experiences. Its high ratings (4.56/5 overall, 4.7/5 ease of use, and 4.68/5 support) demonstrate widespread satisfaction, especially among multi-property hotels and chains. The more recent reviews and high likelihood to recommend (94%) signal a mature, well-supported product. Given this data, which system will deliver the reliability and feature depth your hotel needs today?
If your hotel needs a robust, feature-rich PMS capable of handling multi-property operations, revenue management, and guest engagement, Stayntouch is the clear choice. Its extensive module set (49 unique features) and proven scalability serve medium to large hotels, chains, and resorts well.
If your hotel is smaller, has minimal operational complexity, or prioritizes AI-driven insights for internal efficiency, FoxHis might be worth considering. But given the lack of reviews, proven features, or global presence, Stayntouch offers a safer, more dependable solution for hotels aiming to grow or improve operational consistency.
Stayntouch’s user-friendly interface is a major strength, with a 4.7/5 ease of use score and positive reviews emphasizing its intuitive design and quick onboarding. Users highlight how staff learn the system fast, with training described as "efficient" and "easy," making staff adoption smooth.
In contrast, FoxHis has no publicly available reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. Without user feedback, the safest assumption is that Stayntouch’s proven ease of use edges out FoxHis, especially for hotels looking to minimize staff training time.
Edge: Stayntouch
Stayntouch offers a comprehensive suite of 49 features, including revenue management, guest profiles, mobile check-in, group management, and integrated payment solutions. These capabilities directly support operational efficiency and guest personalization, with many features designed for modern, contactless guest interactions.
FoxHis, on the other hand, provides no specific features listed and no unique modules or integrations, which severely limits its appeal for hotels needing a full PMS. Without concrete feature offerings, Stayntouch’s extensive, proven feature set clearly dominates.
Edge: Stayntouch
Stayntouch’s support ratings (4.68/5) and recent reviews praise its fast, helpful responses, and smooth onboarding process. Reviewers cite excellent technical assistance, with some noting their onboarding was "thorough" and "supportive."
FoxHis again offers no publicly available support ratings or reviews, leaving hotels uncertain about the quality and responsiveness of its customer service. Based on transparency and proven support quality, Stayntouch’s support stands out as the better choice.
Edge: Stayntouch
Stayntouch boasts 188 verified integrations, including key partners like RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and various revenue management, contactless check-in, and payment solutions. These integrations enable seamless operations across multiple systems and channels.
FoxHis has no publicly listed integrations or verified partner connections, limiting its flexibility and ability to connect with other vital hotel systems. In a landscape where integrations matter, Stayntouch clearly leads.
Edge: Stayntouch
Stayntouch’s recent reviews and high ratings—over 4.5/5—show strong hotel satisfaction, especially among boutique, independent, and branded hotels. Property types like hotels, resorts, and city center hotels usually cite improved operational efficiency and guest experience.
FoxHis lacks any review data or user feedback, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction or property-specific ratings. Given the available data, Stayntouch’s higher, more recent ratings make it the more trusted platform.
Edge: Stayntouch
FoxHis offers no publicly available pricing, which suggests a bespoke pricing model or limited transparency. Stayntouch’s base price is listed at $800/month, with no additional implementation or monthly per-room fees, making it clear and predictable.
If budget transparency is crucial for your decision, Stayntouch’s straightforward pricing model offers better clarity and aligns with typical hotel software investments.
Not ideal if your hotel plans to expand quickly or requires extensive integrations, multi-property management, or proven support.
Not ideal if your hotel operates on a very limited budget or has minimal operational needs, as the platform’s extensive features could be more than required.
The core difference is that Stayntouch is a mature, feature-rich, cloud-based PMS with broad market presence, extensive integrations, and proven support. FoxHis, lacking in reviews, features, and global reach, appears more experimental or suited for niche applications rather than full-scale hotel management.
Choose Stayntouch if you want a reliable, scalable system with high user satisfaction, comprehensive features, and a proven track record. Opt for FoxHis only if your property is small, needs minimal complexity, and your team is comfortable navigating an untested platform without extensive support or integrations.
In summary, Stayntouch’s broad adoption, positive recent reviews, and extensive capabilities make it the more trustworthy and future-proof choice for most hotels. FoxHis remains a less certain, less tested option—better suited for experimental or very small-scale hotel operations.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,FoxHis 和 Stayntouch 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 37 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作,非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度,提升员工能力,从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠,很少出现重大故障,并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好,但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告,但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作,凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而,用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进,以满足特定的管理需求。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。FoxHis 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。FoxHis 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 187 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Stayntouch 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
FoxHis:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Xi Ruan Westsoft 的 HT Score 为 0,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问