The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,414 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.
Getabed Suite 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 1,414 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $500/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,414 | 0 |
在分析了 1,414 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management,而 Getabed Suite 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
|
|
−
货币兑换和金融业务
▾
|
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 675 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 235 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 51 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 546 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 245 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 145 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 96 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 532 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 166 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 201 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 13 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and Getabed Suite hinges on your hotel’s priorities. Both aim to streamline operations but diverge significantly in scope, proven reviews, and regional presence. Cloudbeds offers a broad, integrated platform trusted worldwide, while Getabed emphasizes a high-conversion booking engine tailored to increasing direct reservations. Which solution aligns more with your hotel's growth strategy?
Cloudbeds, with its extensive user base and recent reviews, stands out as the more proven choice for most hoteliers seeking a comprehensive management system. Getabed, while promising, has yet to build comparable trust or showcase widespread adoption.
Cloudbeds and Getabed tackle different core problems. Cloudbeds aims to unify operations—covering PMS, channel management, revenue, and guest experience—reducing complexity and errors. Getabed centers on boosting reservations directly via its high-conversion booking engine, cutting out commissions and minimizing cancellations.
Both address revenue growth, but Cloudbeds’s versatility supports a broader range of hotel types and sizes, while Getabed’s niche focus on reservations is ideal if your primary goal is increasing direct bookings without extra costs. Are you seeking a full operational overhaul or a reservation-focused tool?
If your hotel needs a complete property management system with integrated channel management, revenue tools, and guest communication, go with Cloudbeds. It’s trusted by over 1,200 users, with 76 recent reviews in the last six months, reflecting current satisfaction.
If increasing direct reservations without commissions is your priority, and you want a straightforward booking engine, Getabed could seem appealing. However, its lack of verified user reviews and global presence makes it a less tested option. Do you want a proven, multi-faceted platform or a niche reservation tool?
Cloudbeds boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.58/5 from over 1,200 reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Recent feedback highlights that staff adapt quickly, and property managers find it straightforward, even with complex operations.
Getabed offers no publicly available review data, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. Given Cloudbeds's stellar reputation and recent reviews, it clearly leads here.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds provides an extensive suite with 90 unique features, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, multi-currency support, automated reporting, integrated CRS, and revenue management modules. It also offers features like group bookings, online check-in/out, and guest messaging.
Getabed’s core strength is its high-conversion booking engine, which is excellent for direct reservations but lacks the broad feature set of Cloudbeds. It does not publicly list additional features or integrations, suggesting a limited scope.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s customer support scores 4.38/5, with reviews emphasizing fast, friendly, and attentive service. Users appreciate its online support, onboarding guidance, and ongoing assistance, with many stating support is a key reason they trust the platform.
Getabed offers no available ratings or testimonials regarding support quality. Without verified feedback, Cloudbeds’s well-established reputation clearly makes it the superior choice for reliable support.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds connects with 190 verified partners, covering OTAs, payment processors, POS systems, and more. Its wide integration ecosystem simplifies data synchronization, reduces manual input, and enhances operational efficiency.
Getabed has no publicly listed integrations or verified partner connections, limiting its adaptability. For a hotel seeking a platform that plays well with other systems, Cloudbeds’s extensive integration network is the clear advantage.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds enjoys a 4.62/5 overall rating from 1,219 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, reliability, and positive impact on operations. Its high NPS score of 8.94/10 and 91% likelihood of recommendation reflect strong trust among diverse hotel segments.
Getabed has no available reviews or ratings, making it impossible to evaluate user satisfaction. Given the volume and recency of Cloudbeds reviews, it’s the more trusted option in the market.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s pricing starts at $500/month, with no free tier or trial, for a comprehensive suite that includes PMS, channel management, booking engine, and more. Getabed’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, limiting transparency.
While Cloudbeds’s cost may seem high, its extensive features and proven ROI justify the investment. Getabed’s lack of pricing info makes assessing value difficult, but the absence of extensive features and reviews suggests it may be less cost-effective.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small with minimal operational needs or primarily relies on simple booking channels.
Not ideal if you need robust PMS, channel management, or extensive automation features.
Cloudbeds stands out with its comprehensive, integrated management system favored by a large, recent, and highly satisfied user base. It offers a broad feature set, numerous integrations, and high usability, making it suitable for hotels looking for operational efficiency and scalable growth.
Getabed, while specialized in direct reservations, lacks the breadth and proven market presence of Cloudbeds, making it more suitable for hotels focused solely on increasing website bookings with minimal operational needs.
If your hotel needs a full property management platform that supports growth, automation, and robust integrations, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. For hotels purely aiming to boost direct reservations on a budget, Getabed’s booking engine might be attractive, but its lack of verified reviews and features makes it a riskier option.
Final recommendation: For most hotels, Cloudbeds’s proven track record, extensive features, and recent positive reviews make it the more reliable and versatile choice.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cloudbeds HMS 和 Getabed Suite 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 78 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
人们注意到货币转换的准确性存在问题,尤其是在多币种交易中。用户反映存在一些差异,影响了对账流程。改进货币转换配置可以简化财务管理。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds HMS 和 Getabed Suite 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds HMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Getabed Suite 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds HMS:否。Getabed Suite:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Getabed Suite 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问