The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 188 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Easygoband 表现出色 .
Guestnet 表现出色 在 customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Checkin and Mobile Checkout.
基于 HTR 上 188 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 23 | 165 |
在分析了 188 条经验证的评价后,Easygoband 用户最看重其 ,而 Guestnet 用户则强调 user-friendly interface, seamless information dissemination, 积极的宾客体验。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless Information Dissemination
▾
|
|
|
+
积极的宾客体验
▾
|
|
|
+
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Technical Issues and Performance
▾
|
|
|
−
与外部系统的集成
▾
|
|
|
−
推送通知和提醒
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #21 2 条评价 | #2 56 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #27 2 条评价 | #2 85 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 13 条评价 | #17 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #7 6 条评价 | #23 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #11 14 条评价 | #3 52 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 16 条评价 | #3 66 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #14 7 条评价 | #7 18 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #3 14 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #6 15 条评价 | #13 3 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #24 1 条评价 | #2 158 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #16 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel guest app can significantly impact your guest experience and operational efficiency. Goguest by Easygoband and Guestnet are two prominent options in this space, each designed to enhance communication, streamline services, and drive revenue. While Goguest offers a comprehensive, customizable platform focused on guest control and operational analytics, Guestnet emphasizes seamless communication, automation, and integration without requiring app downloads. How do you decide which best suits your hotel’s needs?
Both Goguest and Guestnet aim to improve guest engagement and hotel operations. Goguest centers on enabling guests to manage their stay through their smartphones, offering features like in-room dining, activity booking, and room control, complemented by detailed analytics for hotel management. Guestnet, however, provides a web-based, fully customizable guest portal that facilitates communication, upselling, and service management across multiple channels without requiring guests to install an app.
Goguest has a broader set of modules, including tailored promotions and reports, with a focus on revenue growth. Guestnet, in contrast, emphasizes ease of access, multi-channel content distribution, and deep PMS integration, making it a strong choice for hotels prioritizing operational automation and guest self-service. Do you need a fully customizable, feature-rich app or a flexible, multi-channel communication platform?
If your hotel needs a highly customizable guest engagement system that allows guests to control their stay from their smartphones and provides detailed analytics, Goguest is the better fit. Its modules focus on in-room services, activity reservations, and revenue-driving promotions, making it ideal for resorts and luxury properties aiming to enhance in-stay experiences and optimize operational data.
If your hotel requires a digital guest communication platform that minimizes app downloads, supports multi-channel content, and offers strong PMS integrations, Guestnet is the superior choice. It suits boutique hotels, independent properties, and chains that want a seamless, engaging guest experience with less reliance on app-based interactions.
Given the recent surge in reviews—152 for Guestnet versus only 22 for Goguest—the more current and extensive feedback for Guestnet indicates a more reliable, tested platform today. Which approach aligns better with your hotel’s digital strategy?
Guestnet’s user-friendly interface garners a 4.74/5 rating, with many users praising its intuitive design that simplifies guest and staff interactions. Goguest, despite a slightly higher ease-of-use score of 4.82/5, has fewer recent reviews, raising questions about its current user experience.
Guestnet’s onboarding process is rated 4.66/5, with consistent praise for quick setup and minimal staff training. Goguest scores 4.71/5 for onboarding, but the absence of recent reviews raises concerns about ongoing usability improvements.
Edge: Guestnet.
Goguest offers a robust set of features—integrating with multiple booking and operations modules, providing tailored promotions, and generating actionable reports, with a total of 8 core features. It lacks some specific functions like mobile check-in or direct messaging but excels in operational data.
Guestnet provides 12 features, including unique functionalities like Mobile Check-in, App download, Mobile Checkout, and Guest Messaging—features Goguest does not include. Its ability to distribute content across channels and deeply integrate with PMS enhances automation.
Edge: Guestnet.
Goguest’s support rating is 4.5/5, with reviewers citing its reliable assistance and good onboarding. However, the limited number of recent reviews (only 22) makes it harder to assess current support quality.
Guestnet scores slightly higher at 4.82/5, with numerous reviews highlighting responsive support, helpful onboarding, and continuous platform improvements. Guestnet’s larger user base (152 reviews) and recent feedback suggest more consistent, high-quality support.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet excels with 20 verified integrations—including key partners like Mews, ASA Hotelsoftware, and Websline—facilitating extensive connectivity across PMS, POS, and other hotel systems.
Goguest offers 6 verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality and Onity, but has fewer options overall. The shared integration with Mews is a plus, but Guestnet’s broader ecosystem provides more flexibility and automation potential.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s reviews are more recent and plentiful, totaling 152 reviews with a 96.36 HT score, indicating stronger overall user satisfaction. Its high Likelihood to Recommend (95%) and recent positive feedback from diverse hotel segments reinforce its standing.
Goguest’s reviews are fewer (22) and have not been updated in the last six months, making it less reliable for current performance insights. The limited feedback suggests it may not be meeting evolving hotel needs.
Edge: Guestnet.
Goguest’s pricing starts at $400 per month, with no mention of a trial or additional fees, providing a straightforward subscription model. Guestnet’s base price is $500 per month, also without a trial, making it slightly more expensive but equally transparent.
Both platforms lack free tiers or trial options, so budget considerations should include the value of features and support. Your decision may hinge on which platform’s offerings justify the price difference.
Goguest offers a robust, customizable platform with a focus on in-room control, detailed analytics, and targeted promotions. Its core strength lies in enabling guests to manage their entire stay through their smartphones, making it ideal for resorts and luxury properties seeking to elevate guest control and operational insights.
Guestnet, on the other hand, is a highly versatile, web-based guest engagement platform with a larger user base, recent positive reviews, and more integration options. It excels in multi-channel communication, automation, and seamless PMS connectivity, making it suitable for hotels looking to simplify guest interactions and boost operational efficiency without requiring app downloads.
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, app-based experience with detailed operational data, Goguest is the better choice. But for a scalable, easy-to-deploy, multi-channel guest platform that integrates deeply into your existing systems, Guestnet clearly stands out.
In conclusion: For most hotels evaluating current needs, Guestnet’s higher review count, recent positive feedback, and broader integration ecosystem make it the recommended choice.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 和 Guestnet 共享 8 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 应用下载 | ||
| 手机值机 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 移动结帐 |
我们分析了 7 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The tools allow us to reduce paper and manual workflows. At the same time, the optimized communication saves time that we can now invest directly in our guests."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Guestnet allows us to provide guests with all important information 24/7, which significantly increases satisfaction. At the same time, the platform reduces our team’s workload thr..."
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel s... Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel staff. This feature is crucial for fast adoption and smooth operation, minimizing training time and error occurrence.
Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations... Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations, without the need for paper-based resources, enhancing operational efficiency.
许多评论者表示,通过 Guestnet 快速访问酒店服务和设施提高了客人的满意度,从而带来了积极的反馈,并有可能增加回头客的数量。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, wh... While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, which could be improved for a better experience.
评论者们对 Guestnet 与当地旅游数据和酒店管理系统的集成表示赞赏,但也有一些评论者提到希望进一步集成,以增强自动化并减少人工操作。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 和 Guestnet 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 提供 6 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Guestnet 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband):否。Guestnet:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Easygoband 的 HT Score 为 0,Guestnet 的为 96。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问