The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 90 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Crave Interactive 表现出色 在 客户服务 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Messaging and Mobile Checkout.
Easygoband 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Profiles.
基于 HTR 上 90 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | From $400/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 67 | 23 |
在分析了 90 条经验证的评价后,Crave Interactive 用户最看重其 客户服务, 用户界面, 定制,而 Easygoband 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
|
+
定制
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
硬件问题
▾
|
|
|
−
无缝系统集成
▾
|
|
|
−
后端系统
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | #21 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 26 条评价 | #27 2 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 14 条评价 | #5 13 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 7 条评价 | #7 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 26 条评价 | #11 14 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 31 条评价 | #11 16 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 27 条评价 | #14 7 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #10 2 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 26 条评价 | #6 15 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 31 条评价 | #24 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #8 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #8 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Crave Mobile Platform and Goguest Hotel Guest App hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to boost guest engagement and streamline operations through mobile solutions, but they differ significantly in features, market presence, and user feedback. Crave offers a broad suite of functionalities backed by a higher review count and recent positive feedback, making it a more proven platform. Goguest, though less reviewed and with fewer integrations, provides a highly customizable experience focused on guest control. Which aligns more with your hotel’s priorities?
Crave and Goguest serve the core purpose of enhancing guest experience through mobile tools but approach it differently. Crave emphasizes guest service automation with extensive features like digital menus, in-venue ordering, contactless payments, and messaging, supported by 48 reviews and a 4.75/5 overall rating. Goguest, with fewer reviews (22) and no ratings available, focuses on in-room control, direct communication, and tailored promotions. Given the more substantial review base and recent data, Crave’s proven track record suggests it’s the more reliable choice for your hotel.
Crave’s strength lies in its diverse features, including QR codes, Apple Pay, Google Pay, POS integration, and upselling tools, which are absent in Goguest. Conversely, Goguest’s main advantage is its high customization, allowing hotels to tailor modules and functionalities precisely to their needs. Both platforms aim to increase revenue, but Crave’s larger, more recent review base offers a clearer picture of consistent performance.
Are you seeking a versatile, well-established platform or a highly customizable, niche solution?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, easy-to-integrate system with proven results, go with Crave. Its extensive feature set, including contactless ordering, digital menus, and multiple payment options, makes it ideal for hotels that want a broad solution supporting various guest touchpoints. Hotels that prioritize operational efficiency and detailed analytics also benefit from Crave’s proven system and high customer satisfaction.
If your hotel requires a flexible, tailor-made guest engagement experience with specific modules—such as in-room controls, targeted promotions, and personalized communication—Goguest could be the better fit. Its customization capabilities allow you to adapt the app precisely to your property’s unique offerings, especially if you’re looking for a platform that can grow and evolve with your needs.
However, if you want a platform with a solid, recent review history and a broader feature set, Crave is the safer choice.
Crave has a user-friendly interface rated at 4.61/5, with many reviewers highlighting its intuitive design and straightforward onboarding process. Its setup is supported by a dedicated team, and users report that staff adoption is smooth, especially given its extensive features. Some feedback notes that menu customization could be easier, but overall, Crave scores well for ease of use.
Goguest edges slightly ahead with a 4.82/5 rating, with reviewers emphasizing its modern, simple, and highly intuitive interface. Its customization modules are easy to implement, and staff find it straightforward to operate. Both systems excel in user-friendliness, but Goguest's focus on flexibility and a clean interface give it a slight advantage for ease of use.
Edge: Goguest.
Crave offers a comprehensive set of 18 features, including web-based access, guest messaging, mobile checkout, QR codes, Apple Pay, digital menus, in-venue ordering, contactless payments, POS integration, curbside pickup, tipping, upselling, scheduling, and NFC. These features support a broad range of guest services and operational needs, making it ideal for full-service hotels.
Goguest provides just 1 unique feature—guest profiles—focused on personalized communication and control, with additional modules that can be tailored to your hotel. Its modular approach is flexible but lacks the extensive built-in functionalities that Crave offers.
Therefore, Crave’s broader feature set makes it the more capable platform for hotels seeking a comprehensive guest engagement system.
Edge: Crave.
Crave’s support ratings are higher at 4.79/5, with reviews praising its quick response times, proactive service, and helpful staff. Hoteliers frequently mention that Crave’s support team resolved technical issues promptly, contributing to smooth implementation and ongoing operation.
Goguest’s support scores 4.5/5, with some reviews indicating satisfaction but fewer recent testimonials. Users describe the team as capable but note room for improvements in support responsiveness and availability, especially as the platform expands.
Given the more positive, recent review data, Crave’s support offers more confidence in ongoing assistance.
Edge: Crave.
Crave integrates with 17 verified partners, including major players like Oracle Hospitality, Infor, Amadeus, and POS systems such as Kipsu and Book4Time. Its extensive API support allows seamless connection with a variety of hotel management and revenue tools.
Goguest features integrations with 6 partners, including Onity, Mews, Vingcard, and SIHOT, but has fewer verified partnerships overall. Its integration scope is narrower, which could limit compatibility with existing hotel systems.
For hotels seeking broad, proven integrations, Crave’s larger partner network gives it a clear edge.
Edge: Crave.
Crave enjoys a higher overall rating of 4.75/5 from 48 reviews, with recent feedback confirming strong satisfaction and a likelihood to recommend of 93%. Hotels across segments, especially luxury and branded hotels, report excellent experiences, citing ease of use, extensive features, and responsive support.
Goguest has no available ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction accurately. The limited review data suggests it might be more suitable for hotels prioritizing customization over proven performance.
Based on review volume and recency, Crave is the more trusted choice.
Edge: Crave.
Both platforms are priced at a base fee of $400, with no mention of monthly fees, implementation costs, or trials. This indicates a straightforward pricing model, but additional costs like hardware or custom modules may vary by hotel.
Since both are similarly priced, your decision may hinge more on features and support rather than cost.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small or purely boutique with minimal operational complexity.
Not ideal if you need a ready-made, fully-featured platform with extensive integrations and proven performance.
Crave is a mature, feature-rich platform backed by a larger user base, more recent reviews, and a broader range of integrations. Its strengths lie in operational automation, extensive functionalities, and proven support, making it suitable for hotels seeking a comprehensive guest engagement solution.
Goguest excels in customization and simplicity, appealing to properties that want to tailor their app experience and control specific guest interactions. Its smaller review base and narrower feature set suggest it’s better suited for hotels with specific needs and the resources to develop a bespoke system.
For most hotels, especially those looking for proven reliability, scalability, and extensive integrations, Crave is the clearer choice. If your hotel values custom modules and a flexible, guest-centric approach, Goguest could be worth exploring.
In conclusion, if review volume and recent performance are your priorities, Crave’s higher rating, better support, and more extensive features make it the more dependable platform to enhance your hotel’s guest experience and operational efficiency.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $400/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Crave Mobile Platform 和 Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 共享 7 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 二维码 | ||
| 基于网络(无应用程序) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 数字菜单 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 移动结帐 | ||
| 苹果支付 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Crave Interactive 提供卓越的客户服务,响应时间快,支持人员乐于助人。酒店经营者欣赏高效、主动的支持,这有助于迅速解决问题。
虽然用户界面因其对客人友好和直观而受到赞赏,但一些反馈表明它可以更加现代化和可定制,以更好地满足个别酒店的需求。
自定义选项(尤其是菜单更新和访客界面)有限,而且通常需要 Crave Interactive 团队的支持。用户表示希望对自定义有更多控制权。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到了对硬件的担忧,特别是平板电脑的耐用性和充电困难。这些问题会影响使用系统时的整体效率和客户满意度。
该系统与其他酒店管理系统(如 Simphony 和 PMS)的集成,使操作更加顺畅,减少了手动输入。这在大型活动期间以及高效管理客房服务时尤其有用。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Crave Mobile Platform 和 Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Crave Mobile Platform 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 提供 6 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Crave Mobile Platform:否。Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Crave Interactive 的 HT Score 为 75,Easygoband 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问