The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 208 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access 表现出色 在 guest_experience 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Whitelabel Capability.
Goki 表现出色 在 无钥匙进入 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Door Lock Upgrade Kit and Apple Watch App.
基于 HTR 上 208 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 34 | 174 |
在分析了 208 条经验证的评价后,FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access 用户最看重其 guest_experience, 易于使用, 客户支持,而 Goki 用户则强调 无钥匙进入, 远程访问管理, 宾客沟通。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Guest_experience
▾
|
+
无钥匙进入
▾
|
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
远程访问管理
▾
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
+
远程和自行签入
▾
|
+
与活动的融合
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
关键特征
▾
|
−
连接问题
▾
|
|
−
成本效率
▾
|
−
支持响应时间
▾
|
|
−
信号强度
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店无钥匙门禁系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 18 条评价 | #1 91 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #8 7 条评价 | #3 52 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 6 条评价 | #2 13 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 2 条评价 | #2 11 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #4 24 条评价 | #2 50 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 15 条评价 | #3 30 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 8 条评价 | #3 16 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #3 7 条评价 | #1 20 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #12 12 条评价 | #4 20 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #10 20 条评价 | #1 45 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #3 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | #3 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right keyless access system is crucial for streamlining operations and improving guest experiences. Both FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access and Goki aim to reduce physical keys and enhance security, but they differ significantly in scope, integration, and user feedback. Your decision should consider the scale of your property, desired features, and support needs.
With Goki boasting more recent reviews and a higher review count, it currently stands as the more proven solution. Are you ready to pick the system that best aligns with your hotel’s operational goals?
Both FLEXIPASS and Goki aim to modernize access control, but they approach this differently. FLEXIPASS focuses on connecting with multiple PMS and door lock providers for quick deployment, primarily targeting boutique hotels and independent properties. Conversely, Goki offers a hardware-software integrated platform designed for broader hotel types, including hostels and small hotels.
While FLEXIPASS emphasizes rapid installation and connectivity with existing systems, Goki provides a more comprehensive experience with advanced hardware options and an integrated communication system. Which approach aligns better with your property’s operational needs and guest expectations?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, fast-to-deploy keyless solution that connects with major PMS systems and offers whitelabel capabilities, FLEXIPASS is the better choice. It’s ideal for boutique hotels and properties that prioritize quick setup and cost-efficiency.
If you require a robust, integrated access control system that includes hardware options like SmartLocks, advanced APIs, and communication features, Goki should be your pick. It’s better suited for hotels and hostels looking for a complete, scalable solution that supports operational growth and guest engagement.
In summary, choose FLEXIPASS for quick, flexible integrations and Goki for a hardware-inclusive, feature-rich experience.
FLEXIPASS scores slightly lower in ease-of-use ratings at 4.65/5 compared to Goki's 4.79/5. But your staff and guests may find Goki’s hardware more intuitive due to its sleek design and integrated app features. FLEXIPASS's onboarding rating (4.6/5) suggests a smooth process, but some reviews indicate initial setup complexities, especially with PMS integrations.
Goki’s interface and hardware are praised for their simplicity and minimal maintenance. Edge: Goki.
FLEXIPASS offers a unique whitelabel capability, allowing hotels to customize branding and user experience, a feature only it provides among the two. However, Goki includes two exclusive features: a Door Lock Upgrade Kit and an Apple Watch App, enhancing convenience for guests and staff.
Goki’s hardware integrations and communication tools also present a broader feature set. Overall, Goki has a slight edge with more unique features, but FLEXIPASS's customization options make it appealing for branding-focused properties. Edge: Goki.
Both products receive high marks for support, with FLEXIPASS at 4.73/5 and Goki at 4.75/5. Goki’s support is praised for responsiveness and hardware assistance, as reflected in reviews stating, “Support is top notch,” and “quick parts delivery.” FLEXIPASS’s support is similarly rated, with hoteliers appreciating the swift responses and dedicated service.
Given Goki’s larger user base and recent positive feedback, it just slightly surpasses FLEXIPASS. Edge: Goki.
FLEXIPASS integrates with 31 verified partners, including major PMS and guest communication providers, offering extensive options. Goki’s 20 integrations include popular systems like WebRezPro, RMS, and Yanolja Cloud, with six shared partners such as Cloudbeds and HiJiffy.
While FLEXIPASS boasts a broader range of integrations, Goki’s system is deeply embedded in hotel operations, especially in hostels and small hotels. For extensive PMS connectivity, FLEXIPASS has the edge; for specialized hotel integrations, Goki wins. Edge: FLEXIPASS.
Goki has a higher overall rating at 4.2/5 based on 155 reviews, compared to FLEXIPASS’s 4.9/5 from 33 reviews, but the recency of reviews heavily favors Goki. Recent reviews highlight Goki’s ease of use, support, and hardware reliability, especially in small to medium properties.
FLEXIPASS’s reviews, though fewer and older, emphasize quick deployment and good integration, but lack recent feedback to confirm ongoing performance. Given current review activity, Goki is rated higher by hoteliers today. Edge: Goki.
FLEXIPASS does not publicly list specific pricing, with no free tier or trial, reflecting a custom quote model. Goki charges a base price of $400 for hardware, with no visible subscription or ongoing fees.
While FLEXIPASS’s pricing may be flexible, Goki’s straightforward $400 hardware fee offers transparency. Your total costs will depend on hardware needs and system scale, but Goki’s clear upfront cost simplifies budgeting.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in scope: FLEXIPASS is a flexible, PMS-integrated digital key platform, while Goki offers a hardware-enabled, all-in-one access control solution. FLEXIPASS excels in quick, customizable deployment, especially for boutique hotels and properties emphasizing branding.
Choose FLEXIPASS if you want a quick, flexible setup with many integrations and don’t need hardware. Opt for Goki if you seek a hardware-inclusive, scalable system with a focus on security, guest engagement, and ongoing support.
In conclusion, if your hotel is looking for a proven, multi-feature solution with recent positive reviews, Goki is the stronger option. For properties prioritizing rapid deployment and extensive PMS compatibility, FLEXIPASS is a solid choice.
Note: This comparison reflects current data, including recent reviews and feature sets. Your final decision should align with your property’s specific needs, scale, and future growth plans.
酒店无钥匙门禁系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $400/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access 和 Goki 共享 10 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 白标能力 | ||
| 苹果手表应用 | ||
| 门锁升级套件 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want our competitive advantage to be our Efficiency, we seek to differentiate ourselves from the positioning of traditional hostels that run manual operations and define our ide..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"THE BLUE was one of the first fully digital hotels in Australia and with goki having the integration to our preferred PMS it was a no brainer to give it a go. With a contactless an..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统通过提供非接触式客房出入解决方案,显著改善了客人体验,这在疫情期间尤其有益。客人认为该应用程序很方便,并欣赏快速、轻松的入住流程。
许多评论称赞 FLEXIPASS 易于使用,无论是对客人还是员工而言。该系统允许客人通过应用程序访问他们的房间,通过快速简便的入住流程提升客人体验。
许多人称赞 FLEXIPASS 的客户服务出色,支持团队反应迅速。不过,一些评论指出,远程支持和售后服务还有待改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户提到需要一些功能,例如房间的多个钥匙选项以及与 PMS 系统的更好集成。有些人发现系统很复杂,或者在初始设置和支持方面存在问题。
许多评论都提到,使用 FLEXIPASS 的一大优势是节省成本。减少实体钥匙卡的使用,减少员工互动的频率,可以降低运营成本。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Goki的无钥匙入住系统因其便捷的使用体验和无需实体钥匙而提升安全性而备受赞誉。宾客赞赏其带来的便利,酒店经营者则强调该系统有助于简化入住流程并提高运营效... Goki的无钥匙入住系统因其便捷的使用体验和无需实体钥匙而提升安全性而备受赞誉。宾客赞赏其带来的便利,酒店经营者则强调该系统有助于简化入住流程并提高运营效率。
评论者讨论了远程管理客房访问权限的价值,这可以灵活安排客人的抵达时间,并减轻前台的工作量,对于员工有限或不提供 24 小时服务的酒店来说尤其有利。
集成的消息功能使酒店能够高效地与客人沟通,快速解决客人的疑问或偏好,从而提升客人的体验。该功能尤其因其在告知客人活动或问题方面的透明度而备受赞誉。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评测者提到Goki系统存在连接问题,例如网络中断时会出现故障。这些中断会影响系统的效能,表明其离线功能还有提升空间。
虽然 Goki 的支持团队通常都能及时响应,但一些用户注意到沟通存在延迟,特别是那些与 Goki 支持团队存在较大时区差异的用户。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access 和 Goki 共享许多核心 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access 提供 31 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Goki 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Goki 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access:否。Goki:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access 的 HT Score 为 75,Goki 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问