The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 225 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
dailypoint™ 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Event Based Automations.
GraceSoft 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 225 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 225 | 0 |
在分析了 225 条经验证的评价后,dailypoint™ 用户最看重其 支持服务, 营销自动化, 配置文件引擎,而 GraceSoft 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持服务
▾
|
|
|
+
营销自动化
▾
|
|
|
+
配置文件引擎
▾
|
|
|
+
电子邮件营销
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制复杂性
▾
|
|
|
−
系统性能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客户关系管理与电子邮件营销 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #5 25 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 149 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 34 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 106 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #1 133 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #1 71 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 13 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #20 1 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 195 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #5 7 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #2 15 条评价 | — |
Choosing between dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management and Gracesoft CRM hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and the scope of your operations. Both products aim to streamline guest data management and improve guest relationships, but they diverge significantly in their features, scalability, and support. While GraceSoft offers a straightforward CRM focused on easy innkeeping integrations, dailypoint™ provides a comprehensive, data-rich platform with extensive integrations and advanced automation. Which aligns better with your hotel’s ambitions?
dailypoint™ stands out with a high rating of 4.53/5 based on 150 reviews, and recent feedback emphasizing its robust features, leading to a 89% likelihood of recommendation. Conversely, GraceSoft has no reviews or ratings available, making it difficult to gauge its real-world performance or customer satisfaction. If recent, detailed reviews are your priority, dailypoint™ clearly leads; are you ready to prioritize proven user feedback over the absence of that data?
dailypoint™ excels by centralizing data from over 200 systems, creating detailed guest profiles, and supporting complex marketing automation. GraceSoft’s CRM centers on managing relationships and automating follow-ups within property management workflows but lacks the extensive data centralization or automation features seen in dailypoint™. Would your hotel benefit more from deep data insights and multi-channel automation, or is a simpler CRM sufficient?
Finally, dailypoint™’s global market presence spans 22 countries across multiple continents, reinforcing its scalability for large and complex hotel groups. GraceSoft’s regional footprint appears limited, which could restrict growth or multi-property management. Do you need a platform with international reach, or is local operation more your focus?
If your hotel needs a data-driven CRM with extensive integrations, automation, and multi-property management, go with dailypoint™. Its 28 unique features, including guest profiles, segmentation, automation, and a broad API ecosystem, make it suitable for large, complex hotels or chains aiming for personalized marketing and operational efficiency.
If your primary concern is managing customer relationships within Easy Innkeeping PMS and automating follow-ups for repeat bookings, Gracesoft CRM might suffice, especially for smaller properties. However, without available reviews or detailed feature data, it’s hard to assess if it offers the depth and scalability your hotel might need as you grow.
In summary, choose dailypoint™ if your hotel demands a comprehensive, scalable CRM with rich guest data and automation. Opt for Gracesoft if you need a basic, property-specific CRM integrated with Easy Innkeeping, and your growth expectations are limited.
dailypoint™ enjoys a user rating of 4.14/5 for ease of use, with reviews stating it offers “easy handling” for managing guest communications and automations. Its onboarding process scores 4.28/5, and users praise its intuitive interface despite its extensive capabilities, indicating a relatively smooth learning curve for staff.
GraceSoft has no publicly available ratings or reviews on ease of use, leaving uncertainty about its UI or onboarding experience. Given its focus on simple CRM functions, it might be straightforward, but without user feedback, it’s difficult to confirm.
Edge: dailypoint™.
dailypoint™ boasts 28 core features exclusively designed for advanced CRM, including guest profiles, segmentation, event-based automations, loyalty modules, and extensive integrations like TripAdvisor connectivity. It supports complex marketing campaigns, data cleansing, and multi-channel communication, making it suitable for sophisticated hotel operations.
GraceSoft’s feature set appears limited, focusing primarily on lead tracking, basic guest management, and automation within Easy Innkeeping PMS. It lacks the advanced segmentation, automation, and multi-system integration features found in dailypoint™.
Edge: dailypoint™.
dailypoint™ achieves a high customer support rating of 4.51/5, with reviews mentioning “good, accessible support” and responsiveness. Support staff are praised for their helpfulness and ongoing development, though some users note support costs can be high.
GraceSoft has no available review data or ratings regarding support quality, making it difficult to evaluate. Without feedback, the support experience remains unverified.
Edge: dailypoint™.
dailypoint™ offers integration with 59 verified partners, including hotelkit, apaleo, Customer Alliance, and others. Its open API and broad connectivity support a seamless data flow across PMS, booking engines, POS, WiFi, and marketing platforms, making it highly adaptable for complex hotel ecosystems.
GraceSoft integrates with only one verified partner, limiting its ability to connect with other systems. This restricts flexibility and scalability for larger or multi-system hotels.
Edge: dailypoint™.
dailypoint™ benefits from a strong reputation, with a 4.54/5 rating from 144 reviews in the luxury and independent hotel segments. Recent reviews praise its ability to create comprehensive guest profiles and automate communications, directly improving guest engagement and operational efficiency.
GraceSoft has no reviews or ratings, making comparison impossible. Its user sentiment remains unverified, although its simplicity might appeal to smaller properties.
Edge: dailypoint™.
dailypoint™ is priced at $600/month, with no free trial or implementation fees, indicating a transparent, subscription-based model. Details about GraceSoft’s pricing are unavailable, which may suggest a custom quote or limited transparency.
Given the lack of public pricing for GraceSoft, dailypoint™ offers a clear, predictable cost structure, often crucial for budgeting.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
dailypoint™ offers a comprehensive, data-rich CRM platform designed to scale with your hotel’s growth, providing detailed guest insights, automation, and extensive integrations. Its high review count and recent positive feedback confirm its strong market presence and user satisfaction, making it the clear choice for larger, multi-property, or luxury hotels.
GraceSoft provides a basic CRM solution tailored to properties using Easy Innkeeping PMS, with limited features and no recent reviews. It may suit small, independent hotels with simple needs but falls short against dailypoint™’s robust capabilities.
If you seek a proven, feature-packed platform with extensive support and integrations, dailypoint™ remains the superior choice. For smaller hotels needing only fundamental CRM functions, GraceSoft might suffice—but with less confidence in support and scalability.
酒店客户关系管理与电子邮件营销 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
营销自动化
|
|
|
| 个性化一对一沟通 | ||
| A/B 测试 | ||
| 营销自动化 | ||
| 电子邮件通讯 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
|
▾
模板生成器
|
|
|
| 模板编辑器 | ||
| 所见即所得 - HTML 编辑器 | ||
| 营销活动模板 | ||
| 事务模板 | ||
| 模板导入 | ||
|
▾
客人资料
|
|
|
| 客人资料 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| 符合CCPA | ||
| 自动重复数据删除 | ||
|
▾
分割
|
|
|
| 分割 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
| 标记 | ||
| 忠诚度细分 | ||
| 基于属性的细分 | ||
| 基于地理的细分 | ||
| 基于渠道/市场的细分 | ||
| 基于交付周期的细分 | ||
| 基于房间类型的细分 | ||
|
▾
隐私与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| 符合CCPA | ||
| PCI 投诉 | ||
|
▾
数据管理
|
|
|
| 集中式数据仓库 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
| 开放式 API | ||
| 集中式多酒店/多品牌解决方案 | ||
|
▾
反馈和调查
|
|
|
| 客人反馈模块(评论卡/评论) | ||
| Trip Advisor 连接合作伙伴 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"So, as you think about investing in Digital Hospitality, don‘t forget to think about what it might cost not to!"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We work with dailypoint because the integration between the Booking Manager module and our PMS works really well."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The decisive factor for selecting dailypoint was their wide experience in customer loyalty programs, their high standards in GDPR as well as their ability to connect partner system..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然客户支持因其响应迅速和高效而普遍受到好评,但一些用户提到,与其他提供商相比,支持服务的成本较高,这是一个缺点。
Dailypoint 的自动化功能获得了积极的反馈,尤其是在设置有针对性的群组特定自动化活动、简化营销工作和提高工作流程效率方面。
用户重视用户画像引擎,因为它能够从多个来源挖掘相关的宾客兴趣,从而构建更丰富的宾客画像。这项功能有助于精准的宾客细分和互动,为个性化营销活动带来战略优... 用户重视用户画像引擎,因为它能够从多个来源挖掘相关的宾客兴趣,从而构建更丰富的宾客画像。这项功能有助于精准的宾客细分和互动,为个性化营销活动带来战略优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然功能丰富,但自定义设置较为复杂,一些用户反映难以根据自身需求定制特定报告。这表明该领域仍有改进空间,可以提升用户体验。
有用户反映导航过程中系统运行缓慢,这表明提高速度可以提升用户的整体满意度和效率。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management 和 Gracesoft CRM 共享许多核心 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 功能,但各有独特的能力。dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management 提供 59 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Gracesoft CRM 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management:否。Gracesoft CRM:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。dailypoint™ 的 HT Score 为 100,GraceSoft 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案