The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #44 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #25 24 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #19 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #24 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #28 24 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #23 26 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #29 8 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #31 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #22 20 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #24 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #28 1 条评价 |
Choosing between GRAND PMS by GRAND and Infor HMS by Infor hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and strategic priorities. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ significantly in features, market presence, and user feedback. Your team needs to consider not only core functionalities but also ease of use, support quality, and integration capabilities to make an informed decision.
Grand PMS offers a cloud-based, unified platform with a focus on automation and guest engagement, yet it suffers from a lack of recent reviews and limited features. Conversely, Infor HMS boasts more recent feedback, a broader feature set, and higher user satisfaction, making it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s scale and ambitions?
Both GRAND PMS and Infor HMS aim to simplify hotel operations, but they approach this from different angles. GRAND emphasizes a modern, AI-driven, cloud-based interface designed to unify bookings, billing, and event management, with automation at its core. Infor, on the other hand, offers a feature-rich suite with modules for housekeeping, revenue management, and integrations, focusing heavily on operational efficiency and customization.
While GRAND claims to reduce manual work with AI-powered automation, it lacks recent user reviews and a solid track record of proven performance. Infor’s recent reviews highlight its stability, versatility, and extensive capabilities, despite some concerns about frequent updates causing glitches. Are you willing to prioritize a system with more proven, recent user feedback, or do you prefer a newer platform with less data to evaluate?
If your hotel needs a robust, feature-rich system capable of handling complex operations—such as revenue management, group bookings, and detailed reporting—Infor HMS is the clear choice. Its extensive modules, including housekeeping, payment processing, and automated audits, cater to mid-sized and larger properties seeking comprehensive control.
If your hotel is smaller, or you’re looking for an intuitive, simplified platform with automation for daily tasks, GRAND PMS might fit better—though its limited recent reviews and fewer features suggest caution. For most hotels aiming for reliability and proven support, Infor’s wider feature set and recent positive feedback outweigh GRAND’s minimal offerings.
Based on current reviews, Infor HMS is rated 3.88 out of 5 for ease of use, with many users noting its straightforward navigation and intuitive search functions. Support and onboarding are also rated well, with respondents describing the system as “easy to navigate once familiar” and support teams as “responsive and helpful.” However, some mention the interface could be more modern.
GRAND PMS, with no recent reviews and a 0/5 ease of use score, offers uncertain usability, especially given its new market presence and limited user feedback. The lack of data makes it difficult to judge, but the absence of recent reviews suggests it’s less tested in real-world hotel environments.
Edge: Infor HMS
Grand PMS offers 7 unique features, including transactional emails, booking engine, task management, automated reminders, guest messaging, base pricing, and GDPR compliance. Infor HMS, however, boasts 13 features, such as a housekeeping module, online support, guest profiles, direct billing, mobile app, revenue management, automated night audit, and more.
The sheer number of modules and integrations in Infor HMS indicates a more comprehensive toolset tailored for operational complexity. If advanced features are your priority, Infor’s broader offering clearly outpaces GRAND PMS.
Edge: Infor HMS
Current reviews for Infor HMS emphasize its support team's responsiveness, professionalism, and helpful guidance, with many users rating support at 4.04 out of 5. Respondents praise their prompt assistance in resolving issues and guiding through onboarding.
In contrast, GRAND PMS has no recent reviews, making it impossible to assess support quality. Given the importance of reliable support for smooth operations, Infor’s established customer service is a significant advantage.
Edge: Infor HMS
Infor HMS shines with 113 verified integrations, including partners like Booking.com, Expedia, and various revenue and revenue management systems. This extensive network allows seamless data flow and operational flexibility.
GRAND PMS, on the other hand, has zero verified integrations, limiting its capacity to connect with other operational tools or booking engines. For a hotel seeking a flexible, integrated system, Infor’s ecosystem is far more advantageous.
Edge: Infor HMS
While GRAND PMS has no recent reviews or ratings, Infor HMS has 46 reviews in the past six months, with an overall rating of 4.04 out of 5 and a likelihood to recommend of 74%. Hoteliers across different segments—mainly independent and mid-sized properties—appreciate its flexibility and support.
The lack of recent data for GRAND PMS suggests it’s not yet widely adopted or proven. Therefore, based on recent feedback, Infor HMS’s higher ratings make it the safer choice for most properties.
Edge: Infor HMS
GRAND PMS is priced at a flat monthly fee of $900, with no free trial or implementation fee. Pricing details for Infor HMS are not publicly available, but typically, enterprise-level features and integrations imply higher costs, often customized based on property size and needs.
Given the transparent, fixed pricing for GRAND, it might appeal to smaller hotels with limited budgets. However, the broader feature set of Infor likely involves a tailored quote, reflecting its enterprise-grade offerings.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive modules like revenue management or housekeeping, as GRAND’s feature set is limited.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, has minimal operational complexity, or prefers a simple, user-friendly interface without extensive modules.
The core difference is that Infor HMS offers a proven, feature-rich platform with a large user base and recent positive reviews, while GRAND PMS remains a new entrant with limited public data. For most hotels, especially those seeking reliability, operational depth, and support, Infor HMS stands out.
Choose GRAND PMS if your hotel is small, growth is in early stages, and you prefer a modern, straightforward cloud system—though beware of its limited features and uncertain support reputation. Infor HMS is better suited for properties that need a comprehensive, integrated solution with robust support and proven performance.
If your hotel demands a mature, scalable PMS with advanced modules and extensive integrations, Infor HMS is the clear choice. For a smaller operation or a pilot project, GRAND might be acceptable—but only if you’re comfortable with limited recent feedback and features.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。GRAND PMS 和 Infor HMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。GRAND PMS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Infor HMS 提供 113 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Infor HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 3.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
GRAND PMS:否。Infor HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。GRAND 的 HT Score 为 0,Infor 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问