The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 887 条经验证的评价后,GRAND 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing between GRAND PMS by GRAND and Mews PMS by Mews requires understanding how each addresses your hotel’s operational needs. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but their approaches and market presence differ significantly. GRAND promises a next-generation, AI-powered platform but lacks recent user feedback and reviews, casting doubt on its current reliability. Mews, on the other hand, boasts over 750 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its ease of use, extensive integrations, and high customer satisfaction. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s growth ambitions?
GRAND positions itself as a forward-thinking, cloud-based platform that unifies hotel and venue operations, emphasizing automation and collaboration. However, with zero recent reviews and a lack of user feedback, it remains an untested option in today’s competitive landscape. Mews, by contrast, benefits from a robust global user base and recent reviews that validate its claims through real-world experiences. The 98 recent reviews in the last six months underscore its ongoing development and responsiveness to user needs.
While GRAND aims to combine event management and proposals into an integrated platform, its current absence of user ratings and independent reviews makes it difficult to validate its performance. Mews’s high 4.62/5 rating and 93% likelihood to recommend reflect consistent user satisfaction. Are you willing to risk an unproven system, or do you prefer a platform already validated by hundreds of hoteliers?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, well-supported PMS with proven integrations, scalability, and a large community of active users, go with Mews. Its extensive features—over 45 exclusive modules like revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and integrated channel management—make it a versatile choice for properties of all sizes. Conversely, if your hotel seeks a futuristic, AI-driven platform with built-in event management and proposals, and if you’re comfortable with unverified claims, GRAND might appeal. But given the lack of recent validation, Mews’s proven track record makes it the safer bet.
For hotels prioritizing operational efficiency, seamless integrations, and customer support, Mews delivers a more mature ecosystem. If innovation and experimental features are your priority, GRAND’s promises are enticing, but the absence of recent user experience data makes it a risky choice. Would you rather rely on a platform with proven performance or gamble on an untested, emerging system?
Mews scores a near-perfect 4.7/5 for ease of use, with consistent user praise for its intuitive, modern interface and simple onboarding process. Its high ratings (98 recent reviews) indicate ongoing satisfaction, ease of adoption, and positive staff experiences. Conversely, GRAND provides no visible user ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to evaluate its usability or onboarding experience. The lack of validation suggests potential usability issues or untested features.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a comprehensive suite of 45+ features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, integrated POS, real-time reporting, and a vast marketplace with over 1,000 integrations. GRAND, on the other hand, claims to unify bookings, housekeeping, billing, and event management but offers no detailed feature count or independent validation of its capabilities.
Given the extensive, proven features and active development, Mews clearly has a more mature and feature-rich ecosystem. Its dedicated modules support a wide range of hotel operations, surpassing GRAND’s unverified offerings. Which platform do you trust to provide a broad, reliable feature set?
Edge: Mews.
Mews maintains a strong reputation for customer support, with an average support rating of 4.27/5 based on recent reviews. Users describe its support team as quick, helpful, and proactive, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. GRAND’s support experience is unverified, with no recent reviews or independent feedback available, raising concerns about responsiveness and reliability.
Given Mews’s proven support track record and recent positive reviews, it’s the safer choice for hotels that value dependable assistance during implementation and daily operations. Without validation, GRAND’s support remains uncertain. Which support system would you prefer to rely on?
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent review count of 758 and a high 93% likelihood to recommend position it as the more trusted platform among hoteliers. Its reviews highlight consistent satisfaction, ease of use, and tangible operational gains across diverse property types. GRAND’s absence of recent reviews and user feedback means it lacks current validation or confidence from the hotel community.
For properties seeking proven stability and peer affirmation, Mews’s large, active user base and recent high ratings make it the clear leader. Are you comfortable adopting a system with no recent user validation, or do you prefer one endorsed by hundreds?
Edge: Mews.
Both GRAND and Mews are priced at a flat $900 monthly fee, with no mention of implementation fees or tiered pricing options. However, the lack of detailed pricing tiers or optional modules makes it difficult to assess long-term value, especially for smaller properties or those seeking flexible packages.
Since Mews is well-documented and includes a clear, comparable pricing structure, hoteliers can better forecast costs and ROI. GRAND’s pricing appears straightforward but lacks transparency about potential additional charges or scalable options. Which pricing approach aligns better with your budget planning?
Not ideal if:
Edge: Not recommended due to lack of recent validation.
Not ideal if:
Edge: Mews.
Grand’s promise of a next-generation, AI-driven platform is compelling but remains unvalidated for real-world hotel operations. Without recent reviews, its reliability, support, and feature set are uncertain, making it a risky choice for most hotels.
Mews, in contrast, is a mature, extensively reviewed platform trusted by hundreds of hoteliers worldwide. Its proven ease of use, broad feature set, and active support network make it a more dependable and scalable option for hotels ready to grow.
If your hotel values stability, proven performance, and extensive integration capabilities, choose Mews. If you’re an innovator willing to accept the risk of unproven technology, GRAND might appeal, but be prepared for potential pitfalls.
In conclusion, for most hotels, Mews’s recent validation and large user community make it the preferable choice.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。GRAND PMS 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。GRAND PMS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 335 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
GRAND PMS:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。GRAND 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问