The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 100 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
GRAND 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Multi-currency and Multi-lingual.
roommaster 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
基于 HTR 上 100 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 100 |
在分析了 100 条经验证的评价后,GRAND 用户最看重其 ,而 roommaster 用户则强调 客户支持, 预订管理, 集中式数据管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
+
集中式数据管理
▾
|
|
|
+
云和移动访问
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
|
|
−
用户界面体验
▾
|
|
|
−
团体预订功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #30 26 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #13 54 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #31 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #32 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #22 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #34 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #24 15 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #27 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #10 62 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #29 11 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing between GRAND PMS by GRAND and roommaster PMS by roommaster hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they do so with different strengths and user experiences. While GRAND seeks to modernize with AI and broad connectivity, roommaster emphasizes centralized control, reporting, and multi-property management. Your decision should focus on what features and support are most critical for your hotel’s growth.
Are you prioritizing a system with extensive features and strong regional presence or one with a more straightforward setup and proven multi-property management? Let’s explore how these products compare across key categories.
GRAND PMS and roommaster PMS serve similar core functions but diverge significantly in scope and recent adoption. GRAND, launched in 2025, is a newer, cloud-first platform designed to unify hotel and venue operations with AI-driven automation and event management tools. Its zero reviews and recent market entry suggest limited proven track record, especially compared to roommaster's long history and extensive user feedback.
In contrast, roommaster PMS boasts nearly 83 reviews, with a majority from recent months, giving it a more tested reputation. It covers a broad range of hotel types, especially independent and boutique hotels, with a focus on operational control and detailed reporting. Do you need a familiar system with extensive real-world validation or a fresh, AI-enhanced platform? The choice depends on your hotel’s appetite for risk versus proven reliability.
If your hotel requires a robust, multi-property management system with proven results, go with roommaster PMS. It’s especially suitable for hotels that prioritize comprehensive reporting, detailed workflows, and regional support, particularly in North America and Europe. Its wealth of integrations and user reviews demonstrate a mature platform that reduces manual errors and enhances operational oversight.
However, if your hotel values advanced automation, AI-powered tools, and plans to innovate with event management or venue coordination, GRAND PMS might be appealing. Its modern, cloud-based architecture and focus on automation can reduce manual work and elevate guest interactions—ideal for forward-thinking properties eager to adopt new tech.
Based on available ratings, roommaster PMS scores slightly higher for ease of use at 4.22/5, with recent reviews praising its intuitive, drag-and-drop reservation management and straightforward workflows. Users also highlight its effective onboarding process and user-friendly back-office features, especially for staff familiar with property management.
GRAND, with a 0/5 ease score and no reviews, offers no real data to judge its usability. Its focus on AI and automation suggests a modern UI, but without user feedback, it’s unclear how accessible it is for daily operations.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
roommaster PMS offers over 48 unique features, including channel management, revenue modules, integrated POS, guest communication tools, online check-in, and digital registration. Its extensive feature set supports multi-property management and detailed operational control.
GRAND, with only 2 unique features, primarily emphasizes automation and integrated event tools, but lacks the breadth of operational features found in roommaster. Its AI and cloud capabilities are promising but untested at scale.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
roommaster PMS’s support ratings are at 4.25/5, with recent reviews praising quick responses and effective troubleshooting. Support consistency varies, but many users highlight the advantage of long-term support relationships and accessible training.
GRAND’s support rating is unavailable, offering no recent review data, leaving its support quality uncertain. Given the importance of responsive help in hotel operations, the proven track record of roommaster’s support makes it the safer choice.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
roommaster PMS integrates with 56 verified partners, including major channel managers, booking engines, and property services like Sage, Volo, and GuestCentric. Its extensive integrations facilitate seamless connectivity across the tech stack.
GRAND, with zero verified integrations, provides no confirmed partner connections, which could limit its interoperability at this stage. For hotels needing a system that communicates with existing tools, roommaster’s integration count is a decisive advantage.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
Though GRAND has no reviews, roommaster PMS’s 83 reviews with an average rating of 4.33/5 reflect a strong, consistent user satisfaction. Hotels across segments—especially boutique, resort, and independent hotels—rate it highly for operational efficiency and support.
Given the recent reviews and higher rating, roommaster is clearly the preferred choice among hoteliers. GRAND’s lack of reviews makes it difficult to assess real-world performance.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
GRAND’s pricing details are not available, suggesting it may have a customized or enterprise-level quote approach. Conversely, roommaster offers a transparent base price of $500 per month, with no implementation or hidden fees.
The clear, predictable pricing of roommaster makes it accessible for a wide range of hotel budgets, while GRAND’s unknown pricing might entail higher or variable costs as a newer entrant.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Grand PMS aims to modernize hotel management through AI, automation, and event tools, but its lack of real-world reviews and integrations limits its current appeal. It is best suited for innovative hotels eager to experiment with technology and willing to navigate an unproven platform.
Roommaster PMS has a proven track record with hundreds of reviews, extensive features, and strong support, making it a reliable choice for hotels seeking operational control and seamless management. Its wide regional presence and integration capabilities give it a significant edge for most properties.
If your hotel values proven performance, extensive features, and support, roommaster remains the clear choice. Conversely, if you’re an early adopter interested in automation and new tech, GRAND could be worth exploring, but proceed with caution.
In conclusion, for most hotels, roommaster PMS offers a more dependable, feature-rich solution backed by real-world experience.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,GRAND PMS 和 roommaster PMS 共享 12 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 38 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的... 虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的服务体验。
预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配... 预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配列表和团体入住登记方面仍有改进空间。
RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全... RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全平台上的做法,这显著提升了工作流程效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
RoomMaster的报告生成功能虽然实用,但仍被认为有待改进。用户希望在创建和导出报告方面获得更高的效率和效果,这表明改进功能可以简化分析任务。
一些用户指出需要改进用户体验,尤其强调需要消除重复性任务,例如频繁登录,这会影响日常使用该软件的流畅性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。GRAND PMS 和 roommaster PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。GRAND PMS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster PMS 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。roommaster PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.1/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
GRAND PMS:否。roommaster PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。GRAND 的 HT Score 为 0,roommaster 的为 83。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问