项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 214 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Guestnet 表现出色 在 customer support 方面 .
GuestSpace 表现出色 在 user experience 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 214 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $500/月 | 起价 $600/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 185 | 29 |
在分析了 214 条经验证的评价后,Guestnet 用户最看重其 宾客信息中心和数字通信, ease of use for guests, 方便员工进行内容管理,而 GuestSpace 用户则强调 user experience, 通信功能, 宾客自助服务功能。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
宾客信息中心和数字通信
▾
|
+
User Experience
▾
|
|
+
Ease of use for guests
▾
|
+
通信功能
▾
|
|
+
方便员工进行内容管理
▾
|
+
宾客自助服务功能
▾
|
|
+
定制和品牌灵活性
▾
|
+
Online Check-In Automation
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
后端可用性和培训
▾
|
−
与锁具和预订系统的集成
▾
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
分析与报告
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 56 条评价 | #6 16 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 85 条评价 | #14 10 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 2 条评价 | #19 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #23 0 条评价 | #23 1 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #3 52 条评价 | #17 9 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 66 条评价 | #19 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #7 18 条评价 | #23 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #3 14 条评价 | #8 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #13 3 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 158 条评价 | #9 29 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #16 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Guestnet by Guestnet and GuestSpace by GuestSpace hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both platforms aim to enhance guest communication and streamline operations, but they approach these goals differently. Guestnet offers a comprehensive, highly-rated digital guest app with a focus on rich integrations and customization, while GuestSpace emphasizes automation and self-service features suited for modern, tech-driven properties. Which aligns better with your hotel’s strategy?
Guestnet boasts a significantly higher review count and more recent feedback, positioning it as the more proven and trusted solution. Its 152 reviews in the past six months, with a 96.06 HT R Score, outshine GuestSpace’s 26 reviews and 78.24 HT R Score. Would you prefer a platform with broader validation from similar hotels?
Guestnet and GuestSpace both target hotel guest engagement but differ in their core functionalities. Guestnet emphasizes a fully customizable web app for information, upselling, and multi-channel communication, with strong PMS integrations. Conversely, GuestSpace centers on automating front desk tasks with a no-download digital guest journey, including digital keys and self-check-in.
While Guestnet’s platform is praised for its intuitiveness and automation capabilities, it’s tailored more toward hotels seeking deep customization and integration. GuestSpace offers a simplified, automation-focused experience, ideal for properties prioritizing operational efficiency and guest self-service. Do you need extensive customization or streamlined automation?
If your hotel requires a flexible, integrated guest communication platform that supports complex customization, go with Guestnet. Its ability to connect with multiple PMS and third-party systems makes it suitable for larger or luxury hotels seeking detailed control.
If your property needs to optimize front desk operations with a straightforward, no-download app that enables self-check-in, digital keys, and upselling, GuestSpace is the better choice. It’s designed for properties aiming to reduce overhead through automation and self-service tools. Is your priority operational efficiency or detailed guest engagement?
Guestnet is rated 4.74/5 for ease of use, with reviewers emphasizing its intuitive interface, clear information presentation, and helpful onboarding process. Support staff praise its straightforward setup and seamless implementation, making staff adoption quick.
GuestSpace scores slightly lower at 4.58/5, with users highlighting its user-friendly, web-based design that simplifies guest interactions. Some reviews mention a desire for easier customization of content and analytics but overall report a smooth experience.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet offers 12 shared features, such as multi-channel communication, PMS integration, and customizable templates, with no exclusive features listed. Its strength lies in extensive system integrations, including hotel management, local tourism, and ordering systems, plus digital compendiums.
GuestSpace provides core automation features like digital check-in, mobile keys, in-stay payments, and upsell tools—infused into a no-download app designed for self-service. However, it does not list additional unique features beyond these essentials.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s customer support receives a 4.82/5 rating, with reviews praising its helpful, responsive team and smooth onboarding. Users often mention quick assistance and clear communication, crucial for hotels integrating complex systems.
GuestSpace scores 4.46/5, with some positive feedback on support, but fewer recent reviews and less detailed praise. Users note that support is generally good but could improve in responsiveness and troubleshooting.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet supports 20 verified partners, including popular systems like ASA Hotelsoftware, Websline, and Crqlar, with three integrations shared with GuestSpace. Its broader partner network allows seamless connectivity with PMS, keyless access, and local service providers.
GuestSpace offers only four verified integrations, including Goki, with fewer options for connecting to third-party systems. Its limited integrations may restrict automation and operational flow for larger hotels.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet reviews, with 152 in the last six months, consistently rate it above 4.7/5, with a 95% likelihood to recommend and a 9.51/10 NPS. Hotels across segments, especially luxury and boutique, praise its ease of use, support, and customization.
GuestSpace’s 26 reviews are more recent but rate it around 4.5/5, with a 93% recommendation rate and a 9.31/10 NPS. Smaller properties and boutique hotels appreciate its automation but indicate room for feature expansion.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s pricing starts at $500 per month, with no freemium version, trial, or tiered plans publicly listed. Its cost reflects its extensive features and integrations, catering to hotels seeking a comprehensive digital platform.
GuestSpace charges $600 per month, similarly without a free tier or trial. Its slightly higher price point may reflect its focus on automation and no-download functionality.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a straightforward, minimal setup or has limited IT support.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive customization or complex integrations.
Guestnet offers a highly rated, broad-reaching platform ideal for larger hotels or those seeking detailed customization, integration, and extensive guest engagement features. Its 152 recent reviews and top-tier HT R Score make it the more proven choice for established or luxury properties.
GuestSpace excels in automating front desk operations through its no-download app, making it perfect for smaller, efficiency-focused hotels prioritizing operational cost savings and self-service. Its features support a seamless, contactless guest journey but are less suited for hotels needing deep system integration.
If your hotel values flexibility, integrations, and proven performance, go with Guestnet. If your focus is on simplifying operations with automation and self-service, GuestSpace is the better fit.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $500/月 | 起价 $600/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Communication & Messaging
|
|
|
| 自动翻译(多语言) | ||
| 请求管理 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 应用下载 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
|
▾
Content Management
|
|
|
| 酒店目录 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 当地推荐 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
|
▾
Upselling
|
|
|
| 付款 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
|
▾
Request Management
|
|
|
| 请求管理 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 移动结帐 | ||
| 手机值机 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"The tools allow us to reduce paper and manual workflows. At the same time, the optimized communication saves time that we can now invest directly in our guests."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Guestnet allows us to provide guests with all important information 24/7, which significantly increases satisfaction. At the same time, the platform reduces our team’s workload thr..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
评论一致认为,Guestnet 为客人提供了一个集中查找酒店、住宿和目的地信息的平台,方便他们随时使用。酒店利用 Guestnet 来减少重复提问、节约纸张,并保持内容... 评论一致认为,Guestnet 为客人提供了一个集中查找酒店、住宿和目的地信息的平台,方便他们随时使用。酒店利用 Guestnet 来减少重复提问、节约纸张,并保持内容更新,从而提升运营效率。
A dominant theme is that Guestnet is simple, intuitive, and self-explanatory for guests across different ages and language needs. Hotels say this driv... A dominant theme is that Guestnet is simple, intuitive, and self-explanatory for guests across different ages and language needs. Hotels say this drives adoption because guests can understand it quickly and find what they need without staff assistance.
许多评论提到,酒店员工可以快速更新菜单、新闻简报、版面布局和宾客信息,这既节省时间又能保持内容新鲜。然而,也有一些用户指出,对于新闻简报、图片或格式等... 许多评论提到,酒店员工可以快速更新菜单、新闻简报、版面布局和宾客信息,这既节省时间又能保持内容新鲜。然而,也有一些用户指出,对于新闻简报、图片或格式等更复杂的内容,编辑可能会变得繁琐或不够直观。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
一个反复出现的痛点是,后台操作不如面向客人的应用程序直观,尤其对于初次使用的用户或需要快速进行更改的前台团队而言更是如此。用户评论还要求提供更好的新用... 一个反复出现的痛点是,后台操作不如面向客人的应用程序直观,尤其对于初次使用的用户或需要快速进行更改的前台团队而言更是如此。用户评论还要求提供更好的新用户引导、教程和更清晰的指导,以便员工能够更高效地使用系统。
排名更高的方面
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
The overall user experience of both guests and staff with DropIn is favorable due to its intuitive interface. This ease of use contributes to smooth a... The overall user experience of both guests and staff with DropIn is favorable due to its intuitive interface. This ease of use contributes to smooth adoption and effective utilization of its features.
DropIn 的通讯功能得到了积极的评价;然而,一些用户认为其对外通讯能力还有提升空间,以进一步增强与客人的互动。
自助服务功能让宾客对自己的住宿体验拥有更多掌控权,DropIn 平台为此提供了便利,显著提升了宾客的入住体验。用户也认为这提高了运营效率。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
DropIn 与 Mews 等预订系统的集成及其生成电子门禁码的功能备受好评。这项功能减少了人工办理入住的需要,提高了客房出入的便捷性和安全性。
尽管总体上广受好评,但一些用户提到希望DropIn平台能提供更多自定义选项,尤其是在访客沟通和菜单设置方面。这方面的改进可以进一步提升其实用性。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Guestnet 和 GuestSpace 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Guestnet 提供 20 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 GuestSpace 提供 4 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Guestnet 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Guestnet:否。GuestSpace:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Guestnet 的 HT Score 为 97,GuestSpace 的为 77。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐