项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
在分析了 201 条经验证的评价后,Guestnet 用户最看重其 易用性与直观流程, support_and_product_evolution, 客人信息集中与数字通信,而 Liverton 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易用性与直观流程
▾
|
|
|
+
Support_and_product_evolution
▾
|
|
|
+
客人信息集中与数字通信
▾
|
|
|
+
内容定制、品牌化与个性化
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Bill_viewing_checkout_and_pms_integration
▾
|
|
|
−
Tv_and_multi_channel_distribution
▾
|
|
|
−
Reports_analytics_and_admin_controls
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 56 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 85 条评价 | #22 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 2 条评价 | #15 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #23 0 条评价 | #14 1 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #3 52 条评价 | #24 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 66 条评价 | #19 3 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #7 18 条评价 | #19 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #3 14 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #13 3 条评价 | #21 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 158 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 0 条评价 | — |
As a hotelier weighing Guestnet by Guestnet and Guest Services by Liverton, your main challenge is selecting a platform that elevates your guest experience while streamlining operations. Both products aim to modernize guest interactions through digital touchpoints, but they differ significantly in features, user feedback, and overall market presence. Guestnet’s high review count and recent positive feedback make it the more reliable choice today.
Are you prioritizing wider adoption and proven success, or are you seeking a highly customizable platform with a broader feature set? Let’s compare each product’s strengths and weaknesses to help you decide.
Guestnet and Guest Services target similar problems—enhancing guest engagement and operational efficiency through digital interfaces—but they diverge in their approach and maturity. Guestnet is a comprehensive, fully integrated guest app designed to support communication, upselling, and information sharing without requiring app downloads, which fosters high guest adoption. Meanwhile, Liverton’s Guest Services offers extensive in-room features like digital check-in, room selection, and F&B ordering, emphasizing in-room convenience.
Guestnet’s platform has a higher review volume (152 reviews, 51 in the last six months) and a superior recent rating, indicating broader hotel trust and ongoing support. Liverton’s smaller review base (7 reviews, none in the last six months) limits confidence in its current performance and market standing. Given the recent activity and higher ratings, Guestnet is the safer bet for reliable, well-supported digital guest engagement.
If your hotel needs a versatile, easy-to-integrate guest communication platform that enhances pre-arrival, stay, and post-stay interactions—especially with a focus on automation and multi-channel messaging—Guestnet is the clear choice. Its high NPS score (9.51/5) and 152 reviews, including recent ones, show consistent user satisfaction, especially among luxury and boutique hotels.
Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes a robust in-room experience with features like digital check-in, room selection, F&B ordering, and in-room service requests, Liverton’s platform aligns better. Its feature set includes device-agnostic check-in, digital compendium, and QR-based ordering, suited for properties aiming to modernize in-room services.
For most hotels, especially those valuing proven support and broader market confidence, Guestnet is the recommended solution. Its track record of recent positive reviews and higher ratings make it the more dependable choice.
Guestnet’s UI boasts a 4.74/5 ease of use rating, with many reviewers emphasizing its intuitive design and quick staff onboarding. Guests find it straightforward and engaging, with many noting how it simplifies communication and service access, leading to high adoption.
Liverton’s platform scores slightly lower at 4.57/5, with some users mentioning the need for further clarity during implementation. While both are rated highly, the larger review base for Guestnet provides stronger evidence of a smoother, more consistent user experience.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet offers 12 unique features, including request management, room service ordering, guest profiles, and multi-lingual support. However, it lacks in-room check-in, keyless entry, and F&B ordering directly from guests’ devices.
Liverton presents 20 features, including self-check-in/out, device-agnostic solutions, ID verification, PCI compliance, and door lock integration. It provides advanced in-room functionalities, such as dynamic menu pricing, pre-arrival upselling, and multiple payment options, making it more feature-rich for in-room and check-in processes.
While Liverton’s broader feature set is compelling, its limited recent reviews and smaller user base make Guestnet’s more streamlined, proven feature set the safer choice.
Edge: Liverton.
Guestnet’s support ratings are notably higher at 4.82/5, with many reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Customers describe their support team as "always available and helpful," with quick problem resolution and ongoing assistance.
Liverton’s support scores 4.29/5, and reviewers mention that while the team is technically knowledgeable, some technical issues and onboarding challenges have been experienced. Given the more extensive recent positive feedback, Guestnet’s support is more reliable and consistent.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet boasts 20 verified integration partners, including major names like Mews, Shiji, ASA Hotelsoftware, and Websline. It also connects with key hotel management systems and third-party apps, offering flexibility for diverse property ecosystems.
Liverton has 8 verified partners, including RMS, Cloudbeds, and Oracle Hospitality, but fewer integrations overall. While Liverton’s integrations cover key systems, Guestnet’s broader partner network provides greater flexibility and future-proofing.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s recent reviews reflect a very high satisfaction level, with a 9.51/5 NPS score and 95% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across luxury, boutique, and resort segments praise its ease of use, support, and automation.
Liverton’s ratings are limited, with only 7 reviews and no recent feedback, making it difficult to gauge current hotel satisfaction. Given the volume and recency of Guestnet reviews, it clearly enjoys stronger hotel trust and advocacy.
Edge: Guestnet.
Both products are priced at a base fee of $500, with no additional implementation or monthly per-room charges, making them comparable in cost. Since neither offers a freemium or trial, your decision hinges on value and fit rather than price.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Guestnet’s core advantage is its proven, high-volume, recent reviews, and extensive integrations. Its platform is well-suited for hotels prioritizing guest communication and operational automation without in-room focus.
Guest Services offers a broader feature set aimed at in-room digital experiences, including check-in, keyless entry, and F&B ordering. Its comprehensive functionalities make it ideal for hotels seeking to modernize in-room services and optimize guest in-room interactions.
For most hotels, especially those valuing support and a mature ecosystem, Guestnet remains the safer, more tested choice. If in-room technology and direct guest engagement are your top priorities, then Liverton’s platform warrants consideration.
Guestnet by Guestnet is the more reliable and widely adopted digital guest app, with a higher review count, recent positive feedback, and strong integration options. Its focused feature set and excellent support make it ideal for hotels looking to improve communication, streamline operations, and boost guest satisfaction.
While Liverton’s Guest Services offers a compelling suite of in-room features—especially for properties emphasizing in-room convenience—the smaller review base and lack of recent feedback make its current performance less certain.
In conclusion, if your goal is to choose a proven, well-supported platform with a broad hotel user base, Guestnet is the clear choice. However, if your property’s primary need is cutting-edge in-room technology and advanced upselling, Liverton could be worth exploring further once it garners more recent reviews and market traction.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Communication & Messaging
|
|
|
| 自动翻译(多语言) | ||
| 请求管理 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 应用下载 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
|
▾
Content Management
|
|
|
| 酒店目录 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 当地推荐 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
|
▾
Upselling
|
|
|
| 付款 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
|
▾
Request Management
|
|
|
| 请求管理 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 移动结帐 | ||
| 手机值机 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"The tools allow us to reduce paper and manual workflows. At the same time, the optimized communication saves time that we can now invest directly in our guests."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Guestnet allows us to provide guests with all important information 24/7, which significantly increases satisfaction. At the same time, the platform reduces our team’s workload thr..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
许多评测者强调Guestnet在员工和宾客方面的操作简单、直观,内容变更快速、结构清晰。同时,也有人指出后台任务、排版或某些设置仍可能显得繁琐,尤其是对前台员... 许多评测者强调Guestnet在员工和宾客方面的操作简单、直观,内容变更快速、结构清晰。同时,也有人指出后台任务、排版或某些设置仍可能显得繁琐,尤其是对前台员工或新用户来说。
支持服务常被赞为响应迅速、友好且以解决方案为导向,许多评价者表示Guestnet不断通过新功能和定期优化进行改进。另一部分较小但重要的用户希望获得更快速的支持... 支持服务常被赞为响应迅速、友好且以解决方案为导向,许多评价者表示Guestnet不断通过新功能和定期优化进行改进。另一部分较小但重要的用户希望获得更快速的支持渠道,更好地落实反馈意见,以及在边缘案例和用户请求的改进方面持续推动产品开发。
评审者通常表示 Guestnet 将酒店、服务和目的地信息集中在一个应用或网页应用中,方便客人无需打电话到前台就能找到所需内容。酒店反馈这减少了重复性问题,改善... 评审者通常表示 Guestnet 将酒店、服务和目的地信息集中在一个应用或网页应用中,方便客人无需打电话到前台就能找到所需内容。酒店反馈这减少了重复性问题,改善了日常运营,并带来了内容始终更新的更有序的客人体验。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
酒店重视 Guestnet 在显示账单、加快结账流程以及与 PMS/ASA 和其他酒店系统同步方面的作用。然而,这也是最容易出现问题的环节之一:评论者提到账单的可见性规... 酒店重视 Guestnet 在显示账单、加快结账流程以及与 PMS/ASA 和其他酒店系统同步方面的作用。然而,这也是最容易出现问题的环节之一:评论者提到账单的可见性规则、同步错误、团体预订/隐私复杂性以及缺失的集成,都是导致工作流程仍需优化的原因。
多篇评价提到Guestnet能够将内容扩展到电视、数字标牌和其他渠道,而不仅仅是应用程序。酒店喜欢通过这种方式广播酒店和区域信息的覆盖范围和简便性,但也有一些... 多篇评价提到Guestnet能够将内容扩展到电视、数字标牌和其他渠道,而不仅仅是应用程序。酒店喜欢通过这种方式广播酒店和区域信息的覆盖范围和简便性,但也有一些反馈称存在设置问题、兼容性有限,或希望实现更流畅的多渠道发布。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Guestnet 和 Guest Services by SmartStay 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Guestnet 提供 20 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Guest Services by SmartStay 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Guestnet 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Guestnet:否。Guest Services by SmartStay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Guestnet 的 HT Score 为 97,Liverton 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐