Hilton OnQ vs. Shiji Daylight PMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 June 1, 2026  ·  已分析 35 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 35 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Hilton 表现出色 .

Shiji Group 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Hilton OnQ 与 Shiji Daylight PMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 35 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
75
推荐可能性
0%
90%
易用性
1.0/5
4.6/5
客户支持
1.0/5
4.6/5
性价比
1.0/5
4.5/5
起始价格 Contact sales From $1,200/mo
经验证的评价 1 34

Hilton OnQ 与 Shiji Daylight PMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 35 条经验证的评价后,Hilton 用户最看重其 ,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 易于使用, 支持团队, 执行。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Hilton Hilton Shiji Group Shiji Group
优点
+ 易于使用
+ 支持团队
+ 执行
+ 培训材料
缺点
报告和分析
系统速度
集成能力

Hilton 对比 Shiji Group:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Hilton Hilton Shiji Group Shiji Group
小型(10-24 间客房) #60 1 条评价 #53 2 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #31 17 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #52 0 条评价 #11 13 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #22 2 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Hilton Hilton Shiji Group Shiji Group
精品酒店 #60 1 条评价 #33 17 条评价
豪华酒店 #24 25 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #56 1 条评价 #22 19 条评价
长住酒店 #45 2 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Hilton Hilton Shiji Group Shiji Group
北美 #40 1 条评价 #33 4 条评价
欧洲 #30 8 条评价
亚太 #14 5 条评价
中东 #5 14 条评价

The Decision

When evaluating property management systems (PMS), your hotel faces a choice between Hilton OnQ and Shiji Daylight PMS. Hilton OnQ, designed in-house for Hilton’s extensive portfolio, is a proprietary system with deep integration within the Hilton ecosystem. Shiji Daylight PMS is a cloud-native, scalable platform used by a diverse range of properties worldwide, emphasizing modern design and broad third-party integrations. Both aim to improve operational efficiency and guest experience, but their approaches and maturity differ significantly.

The critical factor is their market presence, user feedback, and feature sets. Hilton OnQ’s limited reviews and outdated perception contrast sharply with Shiji Group’s large, recent review base and contemporary features. Which of these platforms better supports your hotel’s goals?

Is Hilton OnQ or Shiji Daylight PMS Better for Hotels?

Hilton OnQ is a tailored, in-house PMS built specifically for Hilton’s properties, offering tight integration with Hilton’s brand standards and infrastructure. Its primary problem is its obsolescence—many reviews mention that it was designed in the 1990s and has not kept pace with modern hotel technology. Shiji Daylight PMS, on the other hand, is a cloud-native platform with a modern interface, boasting over 30 reviews in the past six months, all of which are recent and highly positive. Its user-friendly design and extensive feature set are praised, making it a more adaptable choice for hotels outside the Hilton ecosystem.

Both systems aim to streamline daily operations, but Hilton’s solution is deeply embedded within Hilton’s proprietary environment, offering limited flexibility. Shiji PMS’s open architecture allows greater integration and customization. Are you looking for a system built specifically for Hilton or a flexible, scalable platform suitable for diverse hotel types?

Shiji Daylight PMS vs Hilton OnQ: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel is part of Hilton’s franchise or managed under Hilton’s brand standards, OnQ might be a natural fit, especially if deep integration with Hilton’s reservation and loyalty systems is crucial. However, given Hilton’s outdated tech perception and limited recent reviews, it’s evident that support and usability are concerns. For independent hotels or chains seeking a contemporary, feature-rich PMS with high customer satisfaction and recent positive feedback, Shiji Daylight PMS is the clearer choice.

Shiji Group’s offering is ideal if your hotel values ease of use, automation, extensive integrations, and a scalable cloud platform. Conversely, Hilton OnQ could be suitable if your operations are heavily tied to Hilton’s infrastructure, and you prioritize brand-specific features over modern interface considerations. Which approach aligns better with your strategic goals?

Is Hilton OnQ or Shiji Daylight PMS Easier to Use?

Hilton OnQ’s user experience receives a dismal 1/5 rating, with reviews highlighting its obsolete interface and poor support. Staff spend excessive hours troubleshooting, and many find it challenging to adapt to its outdated workflows. Conversely, Shiji Daylight PMS scores an impressive 4.63/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive design, comprehensive training materials, and straightforward task management. Hotel staff find it simple to learn and operate, leading to quicker onboarding and less frustration.

Edge: Shiji Group.

Which Has Better Features: Hilton OnQ or Shiji Daylight PMS?

Hilton OnQ offers minimal features—being a proprietary system with limited capabilities—without detailed third-party integrations or advanced automation. Shiji Group, by contrast, boasts over 98 features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, guest messaging, automation tools, and extensive reporting. It also supports multi-currency and mobile app access, features that Hilton OnQ does not visibly provide.

With the broad scope of features, automation, and integrations available in Shiji, it outstrips Hilton OnQ’s limited capabilities. Which features matter most for your hotel’s operations?

Edge: Shiji Group.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Hilton OnQ or Shiji Daylight PMS?

Hilton’s support ratings are abysmally low, with a 1/5 score and reviews describing their tech support as time-consuming and ineffective. Many hoteliers report spending hours with Hilton’s support team without resolution. Shiji Group’s support, rated 4.53/5, is praised for responsiveness, helpfulness, and proactive assistance, with reviews emphasizing the ease of implementation and ongoing help.

Given recent reviews and support ratings, Shiji’s customer service clearly exceeds Hilton’s. Edge: Shiji Group.

Which Has More Integrations: Hilton OnQ or Shiji Daylight PMS?

Hilton OnQ integrates with a small set of six verified partners, mainly internal Hilton tools or a few select vendors. Shiji Group, however, connects with 64 verified partners, including major booking engines, revenue management systems, POS, and CRM platforms. Shared integrations include Actabl, but Shiji’s extensive partner list offers greater flexibility and customization.

If seamless integration is essential for your hotel, Shiji Group’s ecosystem provides a broader, more reliable set of options. Edge: Shiji Group.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Hilton OnQ or Shiji Daylight PMS?

With only one review in the past six months, Hilton OnQ lacks recent, meaningful feedback. Its previous reviews highlight frustrations with outdated technology and support issues. Shiji Group, with 32 reviews, maintains a 74.69/100 score and consistently high ratings for usability, support, and features, with an 8.94/10 NPS score indicating strong customer loyalty.

For current, positive feedback, Shiji Group is the clear favorite. Edge: Shiji Group.

How Much Do Hilton OnQ and Shiji Daylight PMS Cost?

Hilton OnQ’s pricing details are unavailable, likely included as part of Hilton’s internal infrastructure. Shiji Daylight PMS charges a base price of $1,200, with no mention of ongoing fees or implementation costs, making it transparent and straightforward.

Considering value, Shiji’s pricing aligns with its extensive feature set and support. Hilton OnQ’s hidden costs and lack of transparency suggest it may not be cost-effective outside Hilton’s direct management. Edge: Shiji Group.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Hilton OnQ?

  • Hotels that are part of Hilton’s franchise or managed directly within Hilton’s ecosystem.
  • Properties that prioritize brand-specific technology and deep integration with Hilton loyalty and reservation systems.
  • Teams that prefer a system designed to match Hilton’s operational standards.
  • Not ideal if your hotel needs modern usability, flexible integrations, or independent management.

Hilton OnQ’s primary advantage is its integration within Hilton’s global infrastructure. However, its outdated interface and support issues make it less suitable for hotels seeking contemporary solutions.

Not ideal if: You want a modern, flexible PMS; prioritize ease of use; or plan to operate independently of Hilton’s ecosystem.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Shiji Group?

  • Hotels of all sizes seeking a modern, cloud-based PMS with a comprehensive feature set.
  • Independent properties, small chains, or large hotel groups aiming for scalable, flexible operations.
  • Teams prioritizing easy onboarding, automation, and extensive integrations.
  • Hotels looking to improve operational efficiency, guest personalization, and reporting.

Shiji’s platform is versatile, supporting a wide array of property types and operational models. It’s especially useful if you want a system that can grow with your hotel.

Not ideal if: Your hotel needs ultra-specific or niche features not covered by standard modules, or if you require on-premise solutions.

Shiji Daylight PMS vs Hilton OnQ: The Bottom Line for Hotels

The core difference is that Hilton OnQ is a proprietary system designed exclusively for Hilton properties, while Shiji Daylight PMS is a flexible, cloud-based platform suitable for a variety of hotel types. Hilton’s solution is embedded within Hilton’s ecosystem, offering depth of integration but suffering from outdated technology and poor support. Shiji Group offers a modern, feature-rich experience with high customer satisfaction, broad integrations, and a scalable architecture.

Choose Hilton OnQ if your hotel operates solely within Hilton’s brand standards and you need deep internal integration. Opt for Shiji Daylight PMS if your hotel requires a contemporary system, extensive features, and reliable support—especially if you’re an independent or international property. For most hotels seeking agility and modern capabilities, Shiji is the superior choice.

Hilton OnQ 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Hilton Hilton Shiji Group Shiji Group
Starting Price From $1,200/mo

Hilton OnQ 有哪些 Shiji Daylight PMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Hilton OnQ 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Hilton Hilton Shiji Group Shiji Group
任务管理
多种语言
宾客资料
平板电脑/自助值机
网上值机
集中用户和角色管理

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 86 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:Hilton 对比 Shiji Group(按业务目标)

我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率
Hilton Hilton

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Shiji Group Ruby Hotels 中型
+ Successfully went live with 21 hotels across Europe, with additional hotel openings planned in the near future.
+ Equipped with the level of API connectivity they needed to create connections between disparate data sets that would be impossible to achieve manually.
+ Mentions of Technology have increased by 2.5 points, Reception by 3 points and Service by 3.5 points.

"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."

Lucas Höfer
Lucas Höfer
Group Director of Systems and Innovation...
改善宾客体验
Hilton Hilton

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Shiji Group Sunborn London 小型
+ �s fully integrated tech stack, the team unified their data, simplified workflows, and elevated every touchpoint of the guest journey.
+ From seamless check-in and instant mobile ordering to real-time housekeeping updates, everything now runs faster, smoother, and with less effort.
+ Most importantly, technology now works in the background, freeing up staff to focus on what really matters: delivering memorable, personalized experiences that live up to Sunborn

"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."

V
Vasilis Giannios
Operations Manager, Sunborn London

Hilton 对比 Shiji Group:总结

Hilton
Hilton
0.0/5 来自 1 条评价
1.0/5 易用性 1.0/5 客户支持 6 个集成
查看资料
Shiji Group
Shiji Group
4.5/5 来自 34 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

易于使用 97% 正面

用户经常称赞石基 PMS 的用户界面友好,简化了日常操作,降低了新用户的学习难度。评论中强调了其易用性,指出其培训材料易懂、设计直观、任务执行高效。

支持团队 83% 正面

石基PMS支持团队的支持和响应能力一直受到好评。用户赞赏支持人员的专业性和乐于助人的精神,这对更顺利地运营有很大帮助。

执行 83% 正面

一些评论者认为石基 PMS 的实施过程流畅高效,他们赞赏知识渊博、积极主动的实施团队。不过,一些用户建议缩短实施时间以进一步改善体验。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

报告和分析 62% 负面

尽管石基 PMS 的详细报告功能广受好评,但一些用户仍希望获得更先进、更快速的报告工具。具体要求包括增强的汇总报告、详细的账单和更快的报告生成流程。

系统速度 57% 负面

与系统速度和一致性相关的性能问题是用户普遍关心的问题,一些用户指出在高峰操作期间响应时间很慢。用户敦促提高系统速度以提高整体效率。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #11 vs #52
小型(10-24 间客房) #53 vs #60
住宿加早餐与客栈 #46 vs #60
精品酒店 #33 vs #60

独特功能

宾客资料 多种语言 集中用户和角色管理 任务管理 平板电脑/自助值机
4.6/5 易用性 4.5/5 客户支持 64 个集成
访问官网

评分差异最大的方面

易用性 Shiji Group 4.6 vs 1.0 (+3.6)
客户支持 Shiji Group 4.5 vs 1.0 (+3.5)
性价比 Shiji Group 4.5 vs 1.0 (+3.5)
入职培训 Shiji Group 4.4 vs 1.0 (+3.4)

关于 Hilton OnQ 与 Shiji Daylight PMS 的常见问题

Hilton OnQ 能否替代 Shiji Daylight PMS?

这取决于您的需求。Hilton OnQ 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hilton OnQ 提供 6 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Daylight PMS 提供 64 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Shiji Daylight PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 1.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Hilton OnQ 或 Shiji Daylight PMS 是否提供免费方案?

Hilton OnQ:否。Shiji Daylight PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Hilton OnQ 和 Shiji Daylight PMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Hilton 的 HT Score 为 0,Shiji Group 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息