The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 家政软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #4 14 条评价 | #16 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #12 18 条评价 | #17 1 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #9 4 条评价 | #15 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #12 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 5 条评价 | #17 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #9 16 条评价 | #16 1 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 11 条评价 | #17 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 10 条评价 | #18 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #10 4 条评价 | #11 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #9 19 条评价 | #14 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #5 5 条评价 | #13 0 条评价 |
Choosing between HKeeper Housekeeping by HKeeper and Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping by Amadeus hinges on your hotel's operational needs and priorities. Both solve core housekeeping management challenges—streamlining workflows, improving staff coordination, and enhancing guest satisfaction—but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and support structures. Knowing which aligns best with your hotel’s size, segment, and growth plans will determine your success.
HKeeper offers a more recent and robust review base, with 33 reviews in the last six months, compared to Amadeus’s 3. This makes HKeeper’s feedback more current and reliable to assess. Do you want a software with proven recent acclaim or a more established but less reviewed platform?
HKeeper and Amadeus both target hotel housekeeping operations, but HKeeper emphasizes AI integration, real-time inventory, and interdepartmental communication, making it ideal for hotels seeking operational transparency. Amadeus offers deep automation, task prioritization, and a broader feature set, suited for larger properties aiming for efficiency and staff productivity.
HKeeper’s strengths lie in reducing administrative tasks, promoting team collaboration, and providing a user-friendly interface. Conversely, Amadeus’s wide array of features like lost & found, preventative maintenance, and analytics cater to hotels that want detailed operational oversight.
The choice comes down to your hotel’s size and focus: HKeeper is favored by hotels valuing simplicity and real-time communication, while Amadeus appeals to properties seeking extensive automation and multi-property management. Are your core needs operational transparency or advanced automation?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, highly rated housekeeping system that reduces labor costs and improves communication, HKeeper is your best choice. Its recent reviews highlight ease of use, excellent support, and a high NPS of 9.67/10, making it ideal for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency.
If your hotel requires a broad feature set with modules like preventative maintenance, real-time task tracking, and multi-property oversight, Amadeus’s platform offers 17 unique features not available in HKeeper. It’s better suited for larger chains or hotels needing advanced automation and integration.
For smaller or mid-sized hotels focused on streamlining housekeeping workflows, HKeeper’s user reviews and high ratings make it the clear pick. Larger properties or those with complex operational needs should lean toward Amadeus’s comprehensive functionality.
HKeeper’s UI is highly rated at 4.68/5, praised for its simplicity and multi-language support, helping staff adopt quickly. Its onboarding process, rated 4.79/5, ensures your team can get up and running swiftly, with many reviewers emphasizing its intuitive design.
Amadeus scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with users citing its straightforward mobile access and automated workflows that require minimal training. However, support support ratings (1.83/5) are notably lower, often cited as a challenge in onboarding or troubleshooting.
Edge: HKeeper.
Amadeus offers 17 features exclusive to its platform, including lost & found, preventative maintenance, real-time task tracking, and analytics dashboards—enhancing operational oversight for larger hotels. It also provides mobile access, in-app translation, case management, and an open API, broadening customization options.
HKeeper’s absence of unique features means it relies on its core modules—inventory, workflows, communication, and automation—delivering efficiency without complexity. With no exclusive modules, HKeeper's simplicity can be advantageous.
In summary, if your hotel needs specialized features like preventative maintenance or detailed analytics, Amadeus is better. For straightforward housekeeping management, HKeeper’s simplicity suffices.
Edge: Amadeus.
HKeeper’s support is highly rated at 4.89/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and effective onboarding. Customers describe HKeeper support as proactive, with many noting its responsiveness and continuous product improvements.
Amadeus’s customer support, rated at just 1.83/5, receives consistent criticism for slow response times and difficulty in resolving issues. Reviewers mention frustration with unreturned calls and ineffective issue escalation, which hampers user experience.
Edge: HKeeper.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified integrations, including major property management systems, revenue management, and marketing platforms. Shared partners like SiteMinder and Mews highlight its extensive ecosystem, suitable for hotels seeking seamless operational connectivity.
HKeeper has 18 verified partners, with notable integrations like Guesty and Winhotel, but fewer overall options. If your hotel relies on a complex array of third-party systems, Amadeus’s extensive integrations give it a clear advantage.
Edge: Amadeus.
HKeeper’s recent reviews point to a 4.83/5 overall rating, with 97% likelihood to recommend, and a very high NPS score (9.67/10). Hotels across segments, especially luxury and branded hotels, rate HKeeper very highly, praising its ease of use, support, and operational impact.
Amadeus’s overall rating is 4/5, but review count is only 3, and recent feedback is limited. Customer satisfaction appears lower, especially concerning support, which impacts its perceived value.
In terms of recent reviews and ratings, HKeeper is the stronger performer.
Edge: HKeeper.
Both HKeeper and Amadeus do not publicly share specific pricing details, indicating a bespoke quotation process based on hotel size and needs. Expect to discuss custom pricing directly with sales teams for both platforms.
If budget transparency is crucial, neither platform currently offers straightforward pricing, which is typical for enterprise hotel management solutions.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive automation features or multi-property management capabilities.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple interface or limited automation.
HKeeper stands out with its recent high ratings, excellent support, and strong user sentiment, making it a reliable choice for hotels prioritizing operational simplicity and staff communication. Its focus on automation and inventory management helps reduce costs and improve guest experiences, especially for mid-sized or boutique hotels.
Amadeus offers a broad suite of features and integrations, ideal for larger hotels or chains with complex operational demands. Its automation tools can boost staff productivity across multiple properties but may require more extensive training and support.
If your hotel values recent user feedback and straightforward usability, HKeeper is the definitive choice. If your operations demand deep automation, detailed analytics, and extensive integrations, Amadeus is better suited to your needs.
In conclusion, for most hotels currently evaluating housekeeping software, HKeeper’s recent reviews and high satisfaction scores make it the safer, more reliable option.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
每日、每周和每月任务的自动化有助于简化客房服务操作和其他酒店功能,显著减少体力劳动并提高效率。
HKeeper 不断根据用户反馈增强功能,从而提高了客户满意度。然而,持续更新和功能扩展的需求仍然存在。
该工具促进了部门之间的无缝沟通,大大减少了电话和纸质清单的需要,并提高了整体协调性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
HKeeper 的移动应用程序版本因提高运营效率而受到高度赞赏,但用户建议进行改进,例如增加更多颜色主题以获得更好的可视性和用户体验。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。HKeeper Housekeeping 和 Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 共享许多核心 Housekeeping Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。HKeeper Housekeeping 提供 18 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 提供 104 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
HKeeper Housekeeping:否。Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Housekeeping Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HKeeper 的 HT Score 为 25,Amadeus 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问