The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 100 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
HOIST GROUP 表现出色 .
roommaster 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
基于 HTR 上 100 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 100 |
在分析了 100 条经验证的评价后,HOIST GROUP 用户最看重其 ,而 roommaster 用户则强调 客户支持, 预订管理, 集中式数据管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| HOIST GROUP |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
+
集中式数据管理
▾
|
|
|
+
云和移动访问
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
|
|
−
用户界面体验
▾
|
|
|
−
团体预订功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | HOIST GROUP |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #30 26 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #13 54 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #31 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #32 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | HOIST GROUP |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #22 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #34 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #24 15 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #27 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | HOIST GROUP |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #10 62 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #29 11 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) involves assessing how each platform addresses your hotel’s specific operational challenges. HotSoft by HOIST GROUP and roommaster PMS are both designed to streamline hotel operations, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. HotSoft is largely unreviewed and has no recent data, whereas roommaster boasts a well-established track record with over 80 reviews, including recent feedback. Which of these will better support your property’s needs?
HotSoft by HOIST GROUP aims to be an all-in-one solution for hotel operations, but its lack of reviews and recent activity make it difficult to gauge real-world performance. Conversely, roommaster’s recent reviews and high ratings suggest it’s a reliable, well-used tool. Are you willing to risk an untested platform, or are proven solutions more appealing?
HotSoft’s core appeal is its integration within the HOIST GROUP ecosystem, promising a single platform for reservations, billing, and guest management. However, with no reviews or recent ratings, there’s limited evidence of how well it performs in real hotel environments or how users find its usability, support, or value.
roommaster, on the other hand, has 83 reviews with a 4.33/5 overall rating and a 4.22/5 ease of use score. Recent reviews highlight its effectiveness in simplifying workflows, automating reports, and reducing manual errors. For example, a user praised its ability to “significantly streamline hotel operations” and called it “the operational backbone for independent hotels.”
Given the lack of recent data on HotSoft, the clear choice is roommaster, which demonstrates consistent performance and recent positive feedback.
Edge: roommaster PMS
If your hotel operates in North America, South America, or Europe and needs a proven PMS with extensive features, roommaster is the obvious pick. Its broad adoption among various hotel segments—including boutique hotels, resorts, and motels—means it’s tested in real-world environments.
If, however, your hotel is part of a larger HOIST GROUP ecosystem and prefers a platform integrated with other HOIST solutions, HotSoft might seem attractive. But given the absence of recent reviews or user feedback, roommaster remains the safer, more reliable option for hotels prioritizing active support and proven performance.
Edge: roommaster PMS
Roommaster scores well on user-friendliness, with a 4.22/5 ease of use rating derived from recent reviews. Users praise its straightforward reservation management, automated reporting, and cloud accessibility, which allows staff to work from anywhere.
HotSoft, on the other hand, has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding process. Without user feedback, it’s difficult to determine if it’s as intuitive or easy to adopt as roommaster.
Edge: roommaster PMS
Roommaster offers an extensive suite with over 60 features, including channel management, revenue management, booking engine, POS, guest profiles, native email marketing, and automated reporting. It also provides modules for online check-in/out, guest messaging, and digital registration—many of which are absent from HotSoft.
HotSoft’s feature set remains largely unverified, with no detailed feature count or user feedback available. Its integration with third-party applications is unconfirmed, which could limit its functionality compared to roommaster’s comprehensive offerings.
Edge: roommaster PMS
Recent reviews for roommaster indicate a generally positive support experience, with users citing quick response times and effective problem resolution. One reviewer appreciated how “support staff is responsive and knowledgeable,” which is crucial for smooth operations.
Since HotSoft has no recent reviews, support quality cannot be reliably assessed. Given the importance of responsive support in hotel operations, the absence of recent feedback makes roommaster the safer choice.
Edge: roommaster PMS
Roommaster boasts 56 verified integrations, including popular PMS, channel managers, and booking engines like Sage, Volo, GuestCentric, and Otelier. These integrations facilitate seamless workflows across systems, reducing manual data entry and errors.
In contrast, HotSoft has no confirmed integrations, and its ecosystem appears limited. If your hotel relies on multiple third-party solutions, roommaster’s integrations provide a clear advantage.
Edge: roommaster PMS
With 83 reviews and a 4.33/5 overall rating, roommaster is clearly favored by hoteliers. Reviewers highlight its ease of use, staff training simplicity, and support, particularly praising its ability to “significantly reduce manual effort” and “streamline operations.”
HotSoft, lacking recent reviews, cannot be rated by users. The absence of feedback in recent months indicates limited engagement or updates, favoring roommaster as the more trusted choice.
Edge: roommaster PMS
HotSoft’s pricing details are unavailable, with no mention of fees or subscription models. This opacity makes budgeting difficult and could pose challenges when comparing value.
roommaster charges a flat $500 setup fee, with ongoing costs not specified but generally competitive given its feature set. Its transparent pricing allows for better budgeting and cost-benefit analysis.
Given the lack of HotSoft’s pricing transparency, roommaster’s clear cost structure makes it easier to evaluate its value for your hotel.
Edge: roommaster PMS
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
In essence, roommaster offers a mature, feature-rich PMS with proven customer satisfaction, extensive integrations, and active support. HotSoft, lacking recent reviews or detailed feature data, presents a riskier proposition, especially if your hotel needs immediate reliability.
Choose roommaster if you prioritize proven performance, broad integrations, and recent positive feedback. HotSoft might appeal if you are tied into the HOIST Group ecosystem or have specific reasons to explore untested solutions, but it’s a gamble without recent user data.
For most hotels seeking stability and growth, roommaster provides a clear advantage. HotSoft’s unreviewed status makes it a less advisable choice unless future updates or reviews demonstrate its capabilities.
In summary:
Ultimately, the evidence favors roommaster as the more reliable, well-supported option for your hotel’s operational needs today.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| HOIST GROUP |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,HOIST GROUP - HotSoft 和 roommaster PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | HOIST GROUP |
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 48 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的... 虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的服务体验。
预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配... 预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配列表和团体入住登记方面仍有改进空间。
RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全... RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全平台上的做法,这显著提升了工作流程效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
RoomMaster的报告生成功能虽然实用,但仍被认为有待改进。用户希望在创建和导出报告方面获得更高的效率和效果,这表明改进功能可以简化分析任务。
一些用户指出需要改进用户体验,尤其强调需要消除重复性任务,例如频繁登录,这会影响日常使用该软件的流畅性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。HOIST GROUP - HotSoft 和 roommaster PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。HOIST GROUP - HotSoft 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster PMS 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。roommaster PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.1/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
HOIST GROUP - HotSoft:否。roommaster PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HOIST GROUP 的 HT Score 为 0,roommaster 的为 83。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问