项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 969 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Mews 在支持入职和客户成功方面表现出色,尤其适合度假租赁住宿设施(4.8/5),并拥有收益管理模块以及客户关系管理等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 969 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 联系销售 | 起价 $900/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 969 |
在分析了 969 条经验证的评价后,HOIST GROUP 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 支持入职和客户成功, 易用性和直观界面, 自动化与工作流程效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| HOIST GROUP |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持入职和客户成功
▾
|
|
|
+
易用性和直观界面
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化与工作流程效率
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客旅程与自助服务
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
账单开具与支付
▾
|
|
|
−
报告与分析
▾
|
|
|
−
多酒店及集团管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | HOIST GROUP |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 363 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 386 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 80 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 | HOIST GROUP |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 505 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 238 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 181 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 139 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | HOIST GROUP |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 110 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 714 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #30 8 条评价 |
Choosing between HotSoft by HOIST GROUP and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s size, operational needs, and growth plans. Both aim to streamline hotel management, but Mews, with its extensive reviews and recent feedback, clearly leads the pack in user satisfaction and feature depth. Are you ready to adopt a platform that’s proven in the market and highly rated by peers?
While HotSoft is a long-standing name in the industry, its near-zero review score indicates limited recent customer feedback or market presence. Mews, with over 750 reviews and a 4.62/5 overall rating, offers more credibility and ongoing innovation. Which software will support your hotel’s future growth?
HotSoft and Mews both address core PMS functions—reservations, front desk, billing, and reporting. However, HotSoft’s lack of recent reviews suggests it’s not keeping pace with modern hotel technology trends, whereas Mews’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use, automation, and extensive third-party ecosystem. Do you want a system with proven recent success or one with limited current feedback?
HotSoft’s platform appears outdated, with no recent review data to support its claims, unlike Mews, which is praised for its cloud-native design, flexibility, and strong user support. When considering operational efficiency and guest experience, Mews’s modern approach is the clearer choice. Are you prioritizing innovation or legacy systems?
Edge: Mews.
If your hotel requires a flexible, cloud-based system with over 336 integrations, advanced automation, and a rich marketplace of third-party apps, go with Mews. Its focus on scalability, real-time data, and guest-centric features makes it suitable for boutique hotels, chains, and multi-property portfolios.
If your hotel is small, legacy-focused, and less likely to benefit from extensive integrations or modern workflows, HotSoft might seem appealing, but its outdated support and minimal recent reviews make it a risky choice. For forward-thinking hotels aiming for operational agility, Mews is the recommended option.
Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.7/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews emphasizing its modern, intuitive interface and quick onboarding—often within days. Users praise its mobile apps, cloud access, and responsive support, making staff adoption smooth.
HotSoft’s user experience isn’t well documented, and its review score of 0 suggests it may lack the modern UX features that facilitate quick learning and staff engagement. For a hotel aiming to reduce training time and improve staff productivity, Mews holds a clear advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, integrated CRS, mobile housekeeping, task management, and real-time reporting. HotSoft, with no specific features listed, appears to lack the breadth and modern capabilities needed in today’s hospitality landscape.
Mews’s extensive feature set supports diverse hotel operations, from contactless check-in to automated revenue analytics. HotSoft’s limited feature coverage and lack of recent updates make it less suitable for hotels seeking innovation—Mews is the clear winner here.
Edge: Mews.
Mews has a support rating of 4.27/5, with recent reviews describing their onboarding as smooth and support teams as helpful and responsive. Users mention that Mews consistently updates its platform and resolves bugs swiftly, boosting confidence.
HotSoft’s review score of 0 suggests no recent or active support data, raising concerns about ongoing customer service. For hotels needing reliable, modern support, Mews offers a proven support ecosystem, making it the better choice.
Edge: Mews.
Mews connects with 336 verified partners, including top channel managers, revenue tools, and guest engagement apps. Its open API and marketplace enable seamless customization and scalability, supporting diverse operational needs.
HotSoft offers no reported integrations, limiting its capacity to adapt to evolving hotel tech stacks. For a future-proof, integrated system, Mews’s extensive partner network provides a significant advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Considering recent reviews, Mews’s 4.62/5 rating outperforms HotSoft’s score of 0. Mews’s reviews come from hotels across segments—luxury, boutique, hostels, and chains—highlighting broad satisfaction and reliability.
HotSoft’s absence from recent reviews indicates a lack of current user feedback, which diminishes confidence in its performance today. For hoteliers wanting peer validation, Mews is the preferred platform.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900/month, with no free tier or trial info available. HotSoft’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, which complicates budgeting and comparison.
Given Mews’s transparent pricing and proven ROI through reviews, it offers clearer value. HotSoft’s opaque pricing model suggests it may not be aligned with budget-conscious hotels or those seeking clear cost expectations.
Edge: Mews.
HotSoft might suit very small, static properties, but it’s not recommended for hotels seeking efficiency, modern features, or growth.
Mews suits forward-thinking hotels that want to grow and adapt with technology.
Mews is a modern, cloud-native PMS with a proven track record, extensive features, and high user ratings. Its recent reviews confirm it supports operational agility, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth.
Choose Mews if your hotel values scalability, integration, ease of use, and ongoing innovation. HotSoft’s outdated profile and lack of recent feedback make it less suitable for hotels aiming to stay competitive in today’s digital age.
Hotels that want a flexible, well-supported system should select Mews for its comprehensive ecosystem and proven performance. If budget or legacy reliance is your priority, HotSoft might still be on your radar—but the risk is higher without recent customer validation.
In conclusion, Mews’s recent reviews and broad feature set make it the clear choice for hotels seeking a reliable, innovative property management system to support growth and guest satisfaction.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
| HOIST GROUP |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | — | 起价 $900/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 | HOIST GROUP |
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
支持质量和入职流程是评价中的主要区分点:许多客户赞扬响应迅速的客户经理、有效的入职支持和丰富的培训资源。负面反馈同样明显,一些用户描述了工单处理缓慢、... 支持质量和入职流程是评价中的主要区分点:许多客户赞扬响应迅速的客户经理、有效的入职支持和丰富的培训资源。负面反馈同样明显,一些用户描述了工单处理缓慢、升级路径不畅,或支持过于依赖聊天和文章。
一个主要的主题是Mews易于学习,视觉清晰,对前台、客房服务和管理团队来说直观。评论者表示界面缩短了入职培训时间,使日常操作更简单,尽管有少数人提到高级设... 一个主要的主题是Mews易于学习,视觉清晰,对前台、客房服务和管理团队来说直观。评论者表示界面缩短了入职培训时间,使日常操作更简单,尽管有少数人提到高级设置会增加复杂性。
用户反复提到Mews能够自动化处理常规酒店任务,如入住/退房、结算、邮件、房间分配和运营跟进,这节省了时间并减少了人工工作。许多人指出,这种效率使团队能够... 用户反复提到Mews能够自动化处理常规酒店任务,如入住/退房、结算、邮件、房间分配和运营跟进,这节省了时间并减少了人工工作。许多人指出,这种效率使团队能够更多地专注于宾客服务,并以更少的错误和更少的文书工作管理酒店。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
许多评价集中在Mews简化支付、发票、信用卡处理以及将费用记入客人账户或销售点方面。同时,账单流程是最常见的痛点之一,用户提到分账、退款、转账、发票更正和... 许多评价集中在Mews简化支付、发票、信用卡处理以及将费用记入客人账户或销售点方面。同时,账单流程是最常见的痛点之一,用户提到分账、退款、转账、发票更正和会计对账等方面仍需改进。
报告是讨论最多的话题之一,用户希望拥有更好的仪表盘、更深入的分析、更灵活的筛选器,以及更清晰的财务和运营导出。许多人表示Mews提供了有用的数据,但报告层... 报告是讨论最多的话题之一,用户希望拥有更好的仪表盘、更深入的分析、更灵活的筛选器,以及更清晰的财务和运营导出。许多人表示Mews提供了有用的数据,但报告层仍然感觉不够一致,难以定制,或者过于依赖导出到Excel。
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。HOIST GROUP - HotSoft 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。HOIST GROUP - HotSoft 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 351 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
HOIST GROUP - HotSoft:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。HOIST GROUP 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐