项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 949 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Mews 在易用性以及客户支持方面表现出色,尤其适合汽车旅馆住宿设施(5.0/5),并拥有客户关系管理以及客人资料等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 949 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 联系销售 | 起价 $900/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 949 |
在分析了 949 条经验证的评价后,Hop Software 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 易用性和直观界面, 客户支持与培训, 自动化与工作流程效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易用性和直观界面
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持与培训
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化与工作流程效率
▾
|
|
|
+
集成与开放API
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
账单、发票与支付
▾
|
|
|
−
报告与分析
▾
|
|
|
−
多酒店和集团管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 363 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 386 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 80 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 505 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 238 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 181 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 139 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 110 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 714 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #30 8 条评价 |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is a critical decision that impacts your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and revenue. You’re comparing Hop PMS by Hop Software and Mews PMS by Mews because both aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. With more recent reviews and a larger user base, Mews clearly dominates; the question is whether its offerings align with your hotel’s needs.
Hop Software promises an all-in-one platform designed to reduce costs and complexity, while Mews emphasizes automation, extensive integrations, and scalability. Which will deliver more value for your property?
Hop PMS seeks to unify hotel operations with an emphasis on affordability and simplicity, offering an integrated booking engine, channel manager, and payments. However, its review count is zero, and user feedback is nonexistent, making it difficult to verify its performance or support quality.
In contrast, Mews boasts over 750 reviews, with the latest in the past 6 months, and a near-perfect overall rating of 4.62/5. Recent reviews highlight Mews' ease of use, extensive features, and responsive support, making it the more proven choice.
Do you want a less tested but potentially more affordable solution, or a mature platform with proven success?
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable platform with robust automation, over 1,000 integrations, and a large community of satisfied users, go with Mews. It suits mid-sized to large hotels, chains, and properties aiming for digital transformation.
If your hotel is small, budget-conscious, or prefers a very straightforward system with minimal features, Hop might appeal—though its lack of recent reviews and proven track record makes this risky. For scalability and proven performance, Mews is the safer bet.
Would your hotel benefit from proven automation and integrations, or are you seeking a less tested, lower-cost solution?
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, supported by reviews praising its modern, intuitive interface and rapid onboarding. Users frequently mention how simple it is to train staff and manage operations remotely, with many noting that the platform was built with user experience at its core.
Hop PMS, on the other hand, has a 0/5 ease of use rating, with no detailed reviews available. Its unfamiliarity and unverified support make it difficult to assess, but the lack of recent feedback suggests it’s not as user-friendly or well-supported.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 28 features exclusive to its platform, including multilingual support, guest CRM, digital registration, automated reminders, shift planning, rate management, and online checkout. Its 31 shared features are complemented by a broad ecosystem that allows extensive customization.
Hop PMS, with no unique features listed and zero verified features, appears less capable, especially for properties seeking advanced automation and guest engagement tools.
Edge: Mews.
Mews enjoys a 4.27/5 customer support rating, with recent reviews emphasizing its quick, helpful responses and proactive onboarding. Many users state that Mews support is a key factor in successful implementation and ongoing satisfaction.
Hop PMS has a zero/5 support rating, with reviews criticizing the lack of support during implementation and ongoing assistance. The absence of recent feedback further diminishes confidence in its support quality.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts over 336 verified integrations, with a marketplace offering thousands of third-party apps—ranging from revenue management to guest messaging. Many users highlight its ability to connect seamlessly with existing systems, creating a unified tech environment.
Hop Software has only 7 verified partners, including WuBook, with no mention of a marketplace or extensive ecosystem. Its limited integrations restrict potential customization and scalability.
Edge: Mews.
Given the lack of reviews for Hop, Mews stands out decisively. Hoteliers rate Mews 4.62/5 overall, with recent feedback praising its ease of use, automation, and support, especially among boutique and independent hotels, as well as larger chains.
Hop’s absence of reviews makes it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Based on available data, Mews has the clear advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Hop PMS does not list pricing details, which suggests a need for direct inquiry and potential custom quotes. Mews has a base price of $900 per month, with no additional implementation or ongoing fees, offering transparent pricing.
Given the lack of pricing transparency for Hop, Mews provides a clearer cost expectation, making budgeting easier.
Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews is a mature, richly featured, and highly rated PMS, with broad adoption and recent positive reviews. It supports automation, extensive integrations, and a user-friendly experience that helps hotels increase efficiency and guest satisfaction.
Choose Mews if you want a proven, scalable system with extensive support and a large user community. It’s especially ideal for hotels looking to grow, innovate, and deliver a seamless guest journey.
Hop PMS may appeal for very small properties with limited needs and a tight budget, but its lack of recent reviews and features makes it a risky choice. Without verifiable performance data, it’s unlikely to meet the demands of a growing or tech-forward hotel.
For most hotels prioritizing reliability, features, and support, Mews stands out as the clear winner.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | — | 起价 $900/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
最一致的积极评价是 Mews 对酒店团队来说易于学习和使用,具有清晰、现代的界面,帮助新员工快速实现生产力。评论者经常提到,简洁的布局减少了点击次数,加快了... 最一致的积极评价是 Mews 对酒店团队来说易于学习和使用,具有清晰、现代的界面,帮助新员工快速实现生产力。评论者经常提到,简洁的布局减少了点击次数,加快了日常工作流程,并使前台和运营团队的培训变得更容易。
用户常常称赞 Mews 支持团队、客户经理和培训专家的响应速度和帮助程度,尤其是在实施和变革管理期间。同时,这也是一个反复被提及的批评点:一些评价提到工单解... 用户常常称赞 Mews 支持团队、客户经理和培训专家的响应速度和帮助程度,尤其是在实施和变革管理期间。同时,这也是一个反复被提及的批评点:一些评价提到工单解决缓慢、支持方式过于聊天化,或培训内容对复杂酒店配置来说过于通用。
用户通常表示 Mews 能减少预订、支付、邮件、入住/退房和客房服务等方面的重复行政工作。酒店重视节省的时间,因为团队可以将更多精力放在客人身上,而减少手动... 用户通常表示 Mews 能减少预订、支付、邮件、入住/退房和客房服务等方面的重复行政工作。酒店重视节省的时间,因为团队可以将更多精力放在客人身上,而减少手动操作,尤其在高峰期。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
账单和支付处理是讨论最频繁的领域之一,许多用户称赞自动支付、房费收费和支付链接。然而,这也是一个常见的痛点:评论者经常提到退款处理、发票更正、拆分账单... 账单和支付处理是讨论最频繁的领域之一,许多用户称赞自动支付、房费收费和支付链接。然而,这也是一个常见的痛点:评论者经常提到退款处理、发票更正、拆分账单、对账以及公司账单等操作复杂或不够直观。
报告被广泛重视,因为它能让管理者了解入住率、收入和运营趋势,但许多用户希望有更多的自定义、更好的筛选功能,以及报告之间更可靠的一致性。几位评审特别提到... 报告被广泛重视,因为它能让管理者了解入住率、收入和运营趋势,但许多用户希望有更多的自定义、更好的筛选功能,以及报告之间更可靠的一致性。几位评审特别提到商业智能、分析仪表盘和导出选项是 Mews 可以更好支持数据驱动决策的方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hop PMS 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hop PMS 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 352 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hop PMS:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Hop Software 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐