The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 147 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #8 102 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #8 14 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 8 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #11 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #13 57 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #9 50 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #3 65 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #11 63 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #23 20 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #12 10 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #8 7 条评价 |
Choosing between HoresPlus by Hores and RMS by RMS hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in scope, usability, and market presence. HoresPlus offers a streamlined, less feature-heavy platform tailored for small to mid-sized hotels, while RMS provides a comprehensive suite with extensive features suited for larger, complex properties. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s current size and future plans?
HoresPlus emphasizes ease of use and central management with a focus on core functions like reservations and housekeeping. RMS, on the other hand, packs in advanced modules like guest CRM, multi-language support, and integrated channel management, making it more robust but potentially more complex. Do you need a straightforward system or a full-featured platform?
HoresPlus is designed for hotels seeking a simple, intuitive management system that reduces administrative overhead. RMS’s strength lies in its depth and scalability, catering to properties that require detailed operational control and advanced automation. If your hotel prioritizes quick onboarding and minimal training, HoresPlus might seem attractive. But if your property needs detailed guest management, integrations, and extensive reporting, RMS’s large feature set will serve you better.
The more recent reviews favor RMS due to its higher overall rating of 4.56 out of 5 from 293 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its ease of use and customer support. Conversely, Hores has a 0/5 rating, with no recent reviews, indicating limited data and potential lack of ongoing support or updates. Would you prefer a system with proven, current customer satisfaction, or one with limited recent feedback?
If your hotel operates in a complex environment needing multi-channel booking, guest profiles, and integrated POS, RMS is the clear choice. Its extensive features—including guest CRM, ePOS, and multi-currency support—are designed for larger properties or those planning rapid expansion. RMS’s proven scalability and the 20 recent reviews with high ratings make it a reliable choice for properties seeking growth and operational depth.
If your hotel is smaller, with a focus on core reservations, housekeeping, and guest management without the need for numerous integrations, HoresPlus could suffice. Its simplicity might reduce onboarding time and avoid feature overload. But keep in mind that the lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 score suggests limited ongoing support or product updates. For most hoteliers, RMS’s feature depth and customer feedback make it the stronger recommendation.
HoresPlus’s user interface isn’t rated, and there are no recent reviews to confirm its ease of use. RMS, with an overall 4.28/5 rating and recent feedback praising its intuitive booking chart and user-friendly design, clearly demonstrates its simplicity. RMS onboarding is rated at 4.12/5, with many users mentioning fast, straightforward setup.
The support staff at RMS receives high marks, and its digital resources help new users adapt quickly. In contrast, HoresPlus lacks recent data on user satisfaction or support quality. Edge: RMS.
RMS offers a broad collection of 26 features exclusive to its platform, including guest CRM, property management, booking engine, multi-lingual support, and POS integration. These modules give RMS a significant advantage for properties needing detailed guest data, revenue management, and channel distribution.
HoresPlus provides only one unique feature—the drag-and-drop Tapechart—focusing on straightforward reservation and housekeeping management. With only 48 shared features, RMS’s extensive feature set makes it better suited for hotels requiring detailed operational control. Edge: RMS.
There are no recent reviews for HoresPlus to assess its support quality, making RMS the default choice here. RMS boasts a 4.48/5 customer support rating, with reviews praising its friendly, responsive team—"Support staff are very helpful and quick to respond," says one reviewer.
RMS’s support team is known for proactive assistance, often resolving issues promptly. HoresPlus’s absence of recent reviews suggests limited or unreported support initiatives. Edge: RMS.
RMS offers 112 verified integrations, including major OTAs, payment systems, and property tools, with three shared partners like Bookassist and D-Edge. Its extensive partner network supports a wide range of operational needs, ideal for properties with complex systems.
HoresPlus has only 7 verified partners, with unique integrations like Profitroom and MyStay, but its limited ecosystem reduces flexibility. For hotels needing a broad and reliable integration network, RMS clearly leads. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s overall rating of 4.56/5 from 293 reviews surpasses any available data for HoresPlus, which has no recent reviews or ratings. RMS’s recent feedback highlights ease of use, support, and feature satisfaction across segments like boutique hotels, resorts, and motels.
Hores’s lack of reviews makes it impossible to determine current user experience or satisfaction levels. The proven higher ratings and recent positive comments favor RMS. Edge: RMS.
HoresPlus’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, and it appears to follow a custom quote model, possibly limiting transparency. RMS charges a flat fee of $800 per month, with no trial or freemium options, which might be a consideration for budget-conscious hotels.
Given RMS’s established pricing and transparent model, you can factor this into your budget planning more easily. HoresPlus’s unclear costs may present challenges in evaluating ROI or confirming affordability.
Not ideal if your hotel plans rapid growth, requires multi-channel distribution, or needs advanced guest management features. Larger or expanding hotels should look elsewhere.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, with minimal operational complexity, or if budget constraints prohibit the upfront cost. Smaller boutique hotels might find RMS’s extensive features unnecessary.
RMS, with its 90.5/100 overall score and over 293 recent reviews, provides a well-supported, feature-rich platform suitable for mid-sized to large hotels and resorts. Its extensive integrations and proven scalability make it a dependable choice for growth-oriented properties.
HoresPlus, while simpler and less documented recently, may suit very small hotels or those seeking minimal management tools. Its limited recent feedback and lack of broad features mean it’s less suitable for properties with complex needs or expansion plans.
For most hotels aiming to grow or needing comprehensive operational control, RMS stands out as the preferred option by a substantial margin.
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
RMS 的支持团队因其积极主动、知识渊博的帮助而备受赞誉。然而,用户也反映需要更多数字化学习资源和视频教程,以帮助他们更好地使用系统并最大限度地发挥各项功... RMS 的支持团队因其积极主动、知识渊博的帮助而备受赞誉。然而,用户也反映需要更多数字化学习资源和视频教程,以帮助他们更好地使用系统并最大限度地发挥各项功能的效用。
RMS 因其支持业务增长的能力而备受赞誉,尤其适用于需要复杂运营支持的房车度假村。用户称赞其可扩展性和丰富的功能集,包括开箱即用的预订管理、报告和客房服务... RMS 因其支持业务增长的能力而备受赞誉,尤其适用于需要复杂运营支持的房车度假村。用户称赞其可扩展性和丰富的功能集,包括开箱即用的预订管理、报告和客房服务等。这种全面性使酒店能够有效地简化各种运营流程。
用户对RMS卓越的信托会计支持赞不绝口,称赞其在会计问题上提供可靠快捷的帮助。系统的更新进一步提升了其高效管理物业信托会计的能力,许多用户指出,这一功能... 用户对RMS卓越的信托会计支持赞不绝口,称赞其在会计问题上提供可靠快捷的帮助。系统的更新进一步提升了其高效管理物业信托会计的能力,许多用户指出,这一功能显著降低了操作复杂性,使物业经理能够专注于其他关键任务。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
预订系统评价褒贬不一,用户呼吁提升其功能完善度和移动端友好性。建议包括简化预订流程,并考虑为回头客提供免费预订服务,以增强客户忠诚度并促进重复消费。
尽管RMS提供了强大的报表编写工具,但客户仍要求提供更多自定义选项。建议包括可编辑字段和可选列,以便更快、更灵活地生成报表,从而帮助用户进行日常决策,而... 尽管RMS提供了强大的报表编写工具,但客户仍要求提供更多自定义选项。建议包括可编辑字段和可选列,以便更快、更灵活地生成报表,从而帮助用户进行日常决策,而无需从头开始重新构建报表。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。HoresPlus 和 RMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。HoresPlus 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RMS 提供 112 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
HoresPlus:否。RMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Hores 的 HT Score 为 0,RMS 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问