The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Acigrup |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #44 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #25 24 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #19 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #24 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Acigrup |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #28 24 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #23 26 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #29 8 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #31 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Acigrup |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #22 20 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #24 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #28 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Hospitality Software by Acigrup and Infor HMS hinges on key factors like recent reviews, feature set, and support quality. While Acigrup claims a comprehensive platform, it has no recent reviews or ratings, making Infor HMS—with its 46 recent reviews and a 4.04/5 overall rating—the more reliable option for your hotel. Both products aim to streamline operations, but Infor’s proven track record and extensive feature set make it the stronger choice today.
Both platforms serve the core purpose of managing hotel operations, but their approaches differ significantly. Acigrup offers a basic, all-in-one platform with no verified features or recent reviews, leaving its real-world effectiveness uncertain. In contrast, Infor HMS boasts 20 features, including guest profiles, revenue management, and online support, backed by recent feedback from 46 users. The critical question remains: which system will deliver consistent value in your daily operations?
While Acigrup’s lack of recent reviews and features limits confidence, Infor HMS’s active user base and recent feedback suggest it reliably boosts operational efficiency. The decision boils down to whether you prioritize proven functionality and active support or are considering a less tested, potentially customizable option. Are you ready to rely on a system with recent validation, or is a less documented choice acceptable?
If your hotel needs a proven, scalable property management system with deep integrations and a solid support network, Infor HMS is the clear choice. Its extensive feature list—including housekeeping, guest CRM, and automated audits—makes it ideal for mid-sized to large hotels looking for detailed operational control.
On the other hand, if your hotel is small, budget-conscious, or seeking a simpler solution without extensive features or recent reviews, Acigrup may seem tempting—though its lack of recent data makes it a risky bet. For hotels that prioritize reliability, scalability, and ongoing development, Infor HMS is the safer, smarter investment.
Infor HMS has an overall ease of use rating of 3.88/5 based on recent reviews, with users citing its intuitive navigation and short onboarding process. Reviewers mention that the system is “very easy to navigate once you understand its format,” though some note occasional glitches during updates. Support responsiveness also enhances adoption, making staff training smoother.
Acigrup scores 0/5 across all usability metrics, with no recent reviews or ratings available. The lack of data suggests uncertainty about its user interface and onboarding process. Without recent feedback, it’s hard to determine whether your team will find it straightforward.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS offers 20 features, including guest profiles, online support, a housekeeping module, revenue management, and automated night audits—features not available in Acigrup. Acigrup does not list any unique features, leaving its functional scope unverified.
Informat HMS’s feature depth aligns with larger hotel needs, providing tools that automate and optimize daily operations. Your hotel benefits most if these features are crucial for your management style. The clear edge goes to Infor HMS for its extensive, verified feature set.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS’s support scores 4.04/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness, professionalism, and quick issue resolution. Hoteliers note that “support team is very responsive and helps guide through problems,” which is vital for smooth operations.
Acigrup’s customer support ratings are nonexistent, and the absence of recent reviews makes its support quality uncertain. Without current data, Infor HMS’s support team stands out as the more dependable option.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts 113 verified integrations, including major booking platforms like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS, along with modules for revenue management and payment processing. Acigrup has no verified integrations listed, which limits its connectivity options.
For hotels that rely on seamless system integrations to optimize workflows, Infor HMS’s extensive partner network is a significant advantage. The clear winner is Infor HMS.
Edge: Infor HMS.
With 46 recent reviews and a 4.04/5 rating, Infor HMS enjoys strong, recent user feedback from diverse hotel segments, including luxury, boutique, and city center hotels. Users particularly appreciate its customization, ease of use, and support.
Acigrup has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. Given the active feedback for Infor HMS, hoteliers rate it higher on reliability and user satisfaction.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Both products do not list explicit pricing details, indicating a custom quote or enterprise-level negotiations are likely. Typically, such systems are priced based on hotel size and feature requirements, making direct comparison difficult.
Your best bet is to contact vendors directly for tailored quotes, but Infor HMS’s value is reinforced by recent reviews that highlight its ROI and feature richness, making it a smarter investment without transparent pricing data.
The core difference is that Infor HMS offers a feature-rich, well-supported platform with recent, positive reviews. Acigrup presents a less proven, undocumented alternative that may suit very small or budget-conscious hotels, but the lack of recent data makes it a risky choice.
Choose Infor HMS if your hotel values proven functionality, active support, and integrations, especially if operational efficiency is a priority. If your property has minimal needs and prefers a low-cost, simple solution, Acigrup could be considered—yet, the current lack of recent validation makes it less advisable.
For most hotels seeking reliability and growth potential, Infor HMS stands as the clear option.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hospitality Software 和 Infor HMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hospitality Software 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Infor HMS 提供 113 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Infor HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 3.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hospitality Software:否。Infor HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Acigrup 的 HT Score 为 0,Infor 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问