The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 889 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Host Hotel Systems 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise.
Mews 表现出色 在 ease of use 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
基于 HTR 上 889 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 2 | 887 |
在分析了 889 条经验证的评价后,Host Hotel Systems 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #30 1 条评价 | #28 8 条评价 |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel faces a critical decision: whether to go with Host Hotel Systems or Mews. Both aim to streamline operations, improve guest experiences, and boost revenue, but they diverge significantly in scale, features, and user feedback. Host Hotel Systems offers a more traditional, on-premise solution with a limited global footprint, while Mews provides a cloud-native platform with extensive integrations and a broader user base. Which aligns better with your hotel’s future?
The core question is: do you prioritize a trusted, long-standing player with tailored features or an innovative, scalable cloud system supported by a large, active community? To make an informed choice, let’s compare both solutions across key areas.
Host Hotel Systems has been in the industry since 1994 and primarily serves European, African, and South American markets. Its score remains at 0 out of 5, with only 2 reviews—both from the last six months—highlighting a lack of recent user feedback. While praised in some corners for its powerful features and approachable team, the limited review count makes it difficult to assess overall satisfaction or support quality.
In contrast, Mews boasts over 750 reviews, with 98 recent ones, reflecting a vibrant user community and active product development. Rated 4.62 out of 5 overall, its recent reviews praise ease of use, customer support, and continuous innovation. Given the sheer volume and recency of feedback, Mews’s reputation appears significantly more robust and trustworthy for today’s hotel industry needs. Are you comfortable relying on a system with limited current user insights?
If your hotel needs a cloud-based, highly integrable system with a proven track record of supporting diverse property types, go with Mews. Its extensive marketplace, over 336 verified integrations, and features like advanced revenue management, guest CRM, and mobile apps suit hotels seeking flexibility and growth.
However, if your hotel prefers an on-premise solution with specialized modules like Spa & Wellness and values a traditional approach, Host Hotel Systems may be suitable—though its limited recent reviews and lack of recent updates suggest it may lack the agility modern hotels demand. For most hoteliers aiming for scalability and innovation, Mews is the clearer choice.
Host Hotel Systems scores 4.5 out of 5 for ease of use, with positive feedback highlighting its straightforward interface and quick onboarding process. However, with only two reviews, this rating isn’t backed by recent, broad user experiences. Support quality is rated 4/5, but again, limited feedback means less confidence in consistent performance.
Mews, rated 4.7 out of 5 for ease of use, benefits from a modern, intuitive interface praised by many users. Its onboarding is described as smooth, with clear training resources and responsive support. The widespread positive feedback, especially from a large user base, affirms that Mews is highly accessible. Edge: Mews.
Host Hotel Systems offers 45 shared features plus two exclusive modules—On premise management and Spa & Wellness. Notably, it’s more tailored for traditional hotel environments with robust statistical tools and event management, but lacks features like a booking engine or guest app.
Mews, with 45 shared features plus 14 unique capabilities—such as multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, booking engine, and mobile apps—caters to modern, tech-forward hotels. Its open API and extensive marketplace significantly expand its functionality. Edge: Mews.
Host Hotel Systems scores 4/5 in support, with reviews mentioning approachable teams but limited recent feedback due to the tiny review count. This makes it difficult to gauge ongoing support quality or responsiveness.
Mews, rated 4.27 out of 5, benefits from a large, active support team and a reputation for quick resolution of issues. Recent reviews highlight their proactive stance and continuous updates, reinforcing confidence that support keeps pace with demand. Edge: Mews.
Host Hotel Systems integrates with 44 verified partners, including niche solutions like GuestCentric and ROIBACK, but its ecosystem is limited compared to Mews. Its integrations primarily serve traditional hotel functions.
Mews, with 336 verified partners—including major channel managers, revenue tools, and guest experience platforms—offers unparalleled flexibility. The extensive marketplace and open API enable hotels to craft a highly connected tech environment. Edge: Mews.
Host Hotel Systems’s review count and recent feedback are minimal, so hotel ratings are unreliable. Its few reviews do not specify hotel segment ratings, limiting insights into user satisfaction or segment-specific performance.
Mews, with 679 reviews averaging 4.64/5 (and 21 independent hotel reviews giving 4.91/5), enjoys high ratings from boutique, city-center, and independent hotels. Recent reviews confirm strong satisfaction across segments, especially regarding usability and support. Edge: Mews.
Host Hotel Systems does not publicly disclose pricing details, suggesting a customized quote or on-premise licensing model. This lack of transparency may complicate budgeting.
Mews charges a flat $900 setup fee, with no mention of ongoing subscription costs in the available data. Its pricing model appears straightforward, suitable for hotels seeking predictable expenses. For budget-conscious hotels, transparency and simplicity are advantages.
In essence, Host Hotel Systems is a niche, on-premise solution with a loyal but small user base. Its features suit traditional hotels, especially in specific regions, but its limited current feedback raises questions about ongoing support and innovation.
Mews, by contrast, leads the modern hospitality market with a high-rated, cloud-based platform that continually evolves through active user feedback. It offers extensive integrations, features, and a user-friendly interface suitable for most contemporary hotels.
Choose Host Hotel Systems if your hotel’s focus is on niche, traditional operations with a regional footprint. Opt for Mews if your hotel seeks a scalable, innovative platform with proven support, broad integrations, and a vibrant community. For most hotels prioritizing growth and guest engagement, Mews is the clear winner.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Host Hotel Systems 和 Mews PMS 共享 45 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 在前提 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 预订引擎 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 4 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Host Hotel Systems 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Host Hotel Systems 提供 44 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 336 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Host Hotel Systems:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Host Hotel Systems 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问