The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 370 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
HostWare 表现出色 .
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
基于 HTR 上 370 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 370 |
在分析了 370 条经验证的评价后,HostWare 用户最看重其 ,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| HostWare |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | HostWare |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | HostWare |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | HostWare |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #21 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s success. Both HostWare FRO and Stayntouch aim to streamline operations and maximize revenue, but their approaches and maturity levels differ significantly. HostWare FRO is virtually unreviewed and appears to be in the early stages, while Stayntouch boasts a strong market presence, extensive features, and a large, recent review base. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize proven user satisfaction or a comprehensive, integrated platform.
Hoteliers increasingly demand cloud-based, user-friendly solutions with reliable support and integrations. With only a handful of reviews, HostWare isn’t a viable choice for most hotels, whereas Stayntouch’s high ratings and recent feedback make it the clear leader in the segment. Do you want a largely untested product or a mature platform with proven results?
HostWare FRO aims to optimize revenue through advanced algorithms and real-time data analysis, theoretically helping your team make smarter pricing decisions. However, with zero reviews in the past six months, it’s impossible to gauge user satisfaction or real-world performance.
Stayntouch, on the other hand, with over 300 recent reviews and a 4.56/5 overall rating, demonstrates a high level of customer satisfaction and ongoing product support. Its focus on operational simplicity and guest experience has been consistently praised by hotels ranging from boutique to large resorts.
Given the absence of recent feedback for HostWare, it’s evident that Stayntouch is the more reliable and tested solution for hotels seeking a proven PMS. Do you want to bet on a product with no recent reviews or one that’s actively trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, cloud-based PMS with extensive integrations, real-time data, and a strong user community, go with Stayntouch. It’s particularly suited for hotels prioritizing guest experience, multi-property management, and scalability, especially given its 4.56/5 rating from over 300 recent reviews.
If, however, your hotel is exploring a revenue-focused platform with AI-driven insights and no current user feedback, HostWare FRO might be relevant—though its unproven status makes it a risky choice. For most hotels, especially those looking to grow or improve operational efficiency, Stayntouch remains the safer, more proven option.
In summary, choose Stayntouch if you value a mature, well-supported platform with a track record. Opt for HostWare if your hotel is comfortable experimenting with an unreviewed system that may or may not deliver on its promises.
Stayntouch’s interface scores a 4.7/5, backed by positive reviews praising its intuitive, mobile-friendly design. Many users highlight how quick staff training becomes and how the ease of use improves daily operations, with some describing it as “the most user-friendly screens out there.”
HostWare, however, has no user ratings or reviews, making its ease of use impossible to evaluate in context. Early-stage or unreviewed products tend to lack the refined design and user-centric workflows found in Stayntouch.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch offers 49 distinct features, including revenue management, mobile check-in, guest profiles, online check-in/out, group management, and integrated payments. Many features are specific, like digital registration and automated night audits, which aren’t available in HostWare.
HostWare provides no feature list or differentiation points, making it impossible to compare or confirm its capabilities. Its lack of features or integrations at this stage clearly puts it at a disadvantage.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s support ratings are high at 4.68/5, with reviewers citing efficient onboarding, responsive help, and consistent upgrades. Hotels appreciate how their teams can call support easily, and onboarding is described as “smooth and thorough.”
HostWare provides no support ratings, reviews, or evidence of customer service quality. Given the importance of reliable support in hotel tech, the absence of ratings is a significant drawback.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch integrates with 188 verified partners, including popular systems like RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and others. Its open API and extensive third-party connections enable your hotel to customize and enhance operations.
HostWare hasn’t disclosed any verified integrations, indicating either a nascent platform or lack of third-party support. For hotels seeking flexibility and third-party connectivity, Stayntouch’s ecosystem is the clear winner.
Edge: Stayntouch.
With over 300 recent reviews, Stayntouch’s aggregate rating of 4.56/5 far exceeds HostWare’s zero ratings. Hotels spanning boutique to branded properties praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
HostWare, with no recent review data, cannot be rated or validated by user feedback. This makes Stayntouch the evident choice for hotels looking for validation and proven performance.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch charges a flat monthly fee of $800, with no hidden implementation or setup costs. Pricing details for HostWare are unavailable, which suggests it might lack transparent or mature pricing models.
In the absence of clear HostWare pricing, the transparent, predictable model of Stayntouch offers better value and planning certainty for your hotel’s budget.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in market readiness: Stayntouch is a well-rated, widely adopted PMS with proven benefits, while HostWare appears to be an unreviewed, untested alternative.
If your hotel values stability, extensive features, and reliable support, go with Stayntouch. Its proven track record, high user ratings, and broad integrations make it the safer choice.
Choose HostWare only if you’re an innovative hotel willing to accept risk and eager to experiment with a platform that has yet to demonstrate its efficacy in the field.
For most hotels, especially those aiming for growth and operational excellence, Stayntouch offers the peace of mind and features that today’s competitive landscape demands.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| HostWare |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Hosware FRO 和 Stayntouch 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | HostWare |
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 37 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作,非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度,提升员工能力,从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠,很少出现重大故障,并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好,但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告,但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作,凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而,用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进,以满足特定的管理需求。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hosware FRO 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hosware FRO 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 187 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Stayntouch 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hosware FRO:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HostWare 的 HT Score 为 0,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问