The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 887 条经验证的评价后,Hotello 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 customization and flexibility, automation and efficiency, 入职和支持体验。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持体验
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Automation
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
计费复杂性和报告局限性
▾
|
|
|
−
收益管理
▾
|
|
|
−
定价和费用
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Hotello PMS, acquired by Mews, aims to modernize hospitality with a focus on design and reliability, while Mews PMS is a fully developed cloud-native platform known for automation, extensive integrations, and broad market presence. Which one truly meets your hotel's evolving needs?
Both products intend to simplify management, but Mews outperforms Hotello in scale, features, and recent reviews. Does your hotel need a proven, widely adopted solution with a mature ecosystem?
Hotello PMS was developed as a cloud-based property management platform emphasizing reliability and adaptability for various hospitality types. Mews PMS, meanwhile, has established itself as a cloud-first ecosystem with over 750 reviews and a 4.62-star rating, reflecting its strong market confidence.
Hotello’s user-centric design focuses on reducing manual tasks and ensuring service quality, but it has limited features and a smaller partner network—only 16 verified integrations. Conversely, Mews offers over 336 integrations, including advanced modules like revenue management, guest CRM, and online check-in, supported by a consistent stream of recent positive reviews from diverse hotel segments.
Given the recent surge in reviews and a higher overall rating, Mews demonstrates a more reliable, well-rounded solution. Are you willing to rely on a less tested platform with limited features, or prefer a scalable, widely adopted system with proven support?
If your hotel prioritizes automation, extensive integrations, and scalability—especially if you manage multiple properties or require advanced modules—Mews is the clear choice. Its industry-leading review count (758 reviews in the last 6 months) and 4.62/5 rating make it a safer, more robust investment.
If you operate a small, niche establishment with simple needs and prefer a more personalized, design-focused interface, Hotello might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews, a 0/5 rating, and limited features, it’s unlikely to support your future growth or complex operational demands.
For most hotels aiming for efficiency, guest experience, and technological flexibility, Mews offers a more dependable, comprehensive solution backed by recent, positive feedback.
Mews scores 4.7/5 for ease of use, supported by a high onboarding rating of 4.39/5 and recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and quick setup. Users highlight its modern, simple design that reduces training time and accelerates staff adoption, especially for multi-property or technology-driven properties.
Hotello, on the other hand, has a 0/5 rating, with no recent reviews to assess its usability. The limited feedback suggests it may lack the polish and familiarity that make Mews user-friendly.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, digital registration, task management, automated reminders, guest messaging, and real-time reporting. These modules enable full operation management and guest engagement, aligning with modern hospitality demands.
Hotello provides no unique features beyond basic PMS functions, which restricts its ability to support complex operations or growth strategies. Its lack of advanced modules means your team might need additional tools for revenue management, guest communication, or analytics.
Edge: Mews.
Mews has an overall support rating of 4.27/5, with recent reviews emphasizing prompt, helpful responses and continuous platform improvements. Customers frequently comment on the support team's responsiveness, especially during onboarding and issue resolution.
Hotello’s reviews are unavailable, which raises concerns about ongoing support quality, especially considering its limited recent activity and features. Given Mews' established reputation and customer satisfaction ratings, it’s the safer choice for reliable, ongoing support.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like Sage, STR, TrustYou, and its extensive marketplace with over 1,000 third-party apps. Hotello’s network is limited to 16 verified partners, with only a few shared integrations like STR and TrustYou.
The breadth of integrations enables your hotel to customize and expand its tech ecosystem efficiently. For scalable, flexible operations, Mews clearly leads.
Edge: Mews.
Hotello has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction. Mews, with over 750 recent reviews and a 4.62/5 overall score, is highly rated across segments including boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties.
Smaller hotels and boutique properties particularly praise Mews’ ease of use, automation, and integrations, with recent reviews highlighting its impact on operational efficiency. Given this volume and recency, Mews is the preferred choice.
Edge: Mews.
Hotello’s pricing details are unavailable, indicating it may operate on a bespoke or less transparent model. Mews charges a base price of $900/month, with no implementation or setup fees, making its costs predictable for budgeting.
While exact costs depend on property size and modules, Mews's transparent pricing and scalable model provide clarity and value for money, especially considering its extensive feature set.
Not ideal if your hotel plans to grow, requires multiple integrations, or anticipates needing advanced modules like revenue management or online check-in.
Not ideal if your hotel operates at a very small scale with minimal tech needs and prefers a very basic PMS.
Mews provides a full-featured, scalable PMS with broad integrations, recent positive reviews, and proven support. Its extensive modules support automation, guest engagement, and multi-property management, making it suitable for most hotel types aiming for growth and operational efficiency.
Hotello may appeal to small, niche properties with minimal needs, but its lack of recent reviews, features, and limited integrations make it less capable of supporting your hotel’s future success.
Choose Mews if you want a proven, comprehensive platform that can grow with your hotel, and Hotello if your needs are minimal and your property is small-scale or highly design-focused.
In summary: For hotels looking for a modern, reliable, and flexible PMS with proven adoption and ongoing support, Mews is the clear choice. Hotello, while attractive for its design and simplicity, falls short in recent validation, features, and scalability. Your decision should prioritize growth, automation, and customer experience—areas where Mews excels.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that... Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that more advanced configuration options, particularly in report generation and billing, could enhance the platform’s utility further.
The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on deliverin... The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on delivering a superior guest experience. However, some reviews mention that while automation works well, the billing process can sometimes be complex.
Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了... Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了问题解决率和用户满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Mews 可以自动计费,但用户反映其复杂性以及报告和分析方面的局限性造成了困扰。改进这些方面可以为管理财务运营的用户提供更深入的洞察和更大的灵活性。
Mews 凭借其集成功能为收益管理提供了强大的基础,但用户指出,动态定价工具和高级分析方面还有改进的空间,尤其是在多物业运营方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) 提供 16 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 336 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews):否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Hotello 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问