The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #48 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #27 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #29 21 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #37 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #42 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #35 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #23 16 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #16 31 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #13 6 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Hotello PMS and Sirvoy hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and growth plans. Both platforms aim to streamline hotel management, but they do so with different approaches and feature sets. Hotello, acquired by Mews, is a well-established PMS with a focus on reliability and adaptability, yet it currently lacks recent reviews or a clear user rating. Sirvoy, on the other hand, boasts a substantial review base with high recent ratings, especially in customer support and ease of use, making it a more tangible choice for your team today.
Are you prioritizing a system with proven user satisfaction and recent active reviews, or are you considering a platform that is still building its reputation?
Hotello PMS and Sirvoy are designed to serve different hotel types and maturity levels. Hotello, with its emphasis on reliability and adaptability developed over two decades, targets larger or more established properties that require a robust, cloud-based PMS capable of complex operations. Conversely, Sirvoy is tailored for small to medium-sized properties like B&Bs, hostels, and boutique hotels that value ease of use and instant setup.
Hotello’s focus on performance and tailored solutions is appealing for hotels that need a dependable system to scale and customize operations. Sirvoy’s straightforward interface and wide feature set, including channel management and booking engine, make it ideal for properties prioritizing simplicity and quick deployment.
The divergence is clear: if your hotel needs a flexible, enterprise-ready PMS, Hotello might be suitable, but if your priority is an affordable and intuitive tool to handle daily operations, Sirvoy is likely the better fit. Do you need a platform that scales with your growth, or one that simplifies your current workflows?
If your hotel requires a comprehensive, adaptable PMS with a long-standing industry presence and a focus on reliability, Hotello is the natural choice. Its development philosophy centers on reducing manual work and improving guest experiences through a solid cloud platform, making it suitable for larger or more complex properties.
If you prioritize ease of use, quick onboarding, and strong customer support, Sirvoy stands out. With over 95 recent reviews and a 9.41/10 NPS score, it demonstrates consistent user satisfaction, especially among smaller properties looking for a cost-effective, straightforward management system.
For properties seeking advanced features like multi-lingual support, integrated payment terminals, or extensive reporting, Sirvoy’s 43 unique features provide an edge. Meanwhile, Hotello’s strength lies in its reliability and adaptability, which is better suited for hotels with complex operational needs.
In summary: choose Hotello if reliability and scalability are your priorities; opt for Sirvoy if simplicity and recent positive user feedback matter most.
Based on available reviews, Sirvoy excels in ease of use, receiving a 4.64/5 rating and multiple comments about its intuitive interface. Customers praise its straightforward setup, quick onboarding process, and helpful support staff, with many noting they could get their property operational within days.
Hotello, however, has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to assess its user experience today. Historically, complex PMS solutions tend to have steeper learning curves, but Hotello’s design was intended to be user-friendly, which may still hold true.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy offers a broad suite of 43 features that cover essential property management needs, including multi-lingual support, channel management, booking engine, guest messaging, online check-in/out, and integrated payment processing. Many features, like advanced reporting, guest CRM, and automated marketing, are absent in Hotello, which appears to be more limited or undisclosed in features.
Hotello’s feature count is zero based on current data, emphasizing its focus on core reliability rather than extensive functionalities. Sirvoy’s expansive features allow small properties to manage bookings, payments, and channels within one platform, giving it a significant edge.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy’s support ratings are outstanding at 4.85/5, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses and a friendly support team. Many users describe their experience as “the best support I’ve ever encountered,” emphasizing the responsiveness that minimizes operational downtime.
Hotello has no recent review data to evaluate support quality, and its overall rating is absent. Given the importance of support in hotel management, Sirvoy’s proven track record makes it the clear winner here.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy integrates with 21 verified partners, including major booking channels like Booking.com, Expedia, and GDS systems, alongside payment providers and marketing tools. It also supports a variety of unique integrations like RevControl, Oaky, and Cloudbeds, which are absent in Hotello’s limited set of 16 verified partners.
Hotello’s integrations are fewer and less diverse, which could restrict connectivity options as your hotel grows or seeks to expand its distribution channels. Sirvoy’s broader partner network and functionality for channel and payment integrations provide better scalability.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy’s reviews are recent, with 32 in the last six months, and rate it at 83.93/100 on the HTTR Score, with a 94% likelihood to recommend. Hotello has no recent reviews or ratings, indicating an absence of current user feedback.
Among hotel segments like B&Bs, boutique hotels, and resorts, Sirvoy’s users consistently express satisfaction, citing ease of use, support, and value. Hotello’s lack of recent ratings means it cannot compete effectively on user sentiment today.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Hotello does not disclose specific pricing, but as a cloud-based PMS, it is likely a custom quote based on hotel size and needs. Sirvoy charges a flat monthly fee of $200, with no mention of additional setup fees or charges.
Given Sirvoy’s transparent pricing model, small to medium-sized hotels can easily evaluate value. Hotello’s undisclosed pricing makes direct comparison difficult, but the lack of clear costs suggests it may be suited for larger establishments with specific budget allocations.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, needs a quick setup, or prefers a straightforward, low-cost system. Hotello’s complexity and potential costs may be a barrier for smaller, budget-conscious properties.
Not ideal if your hotel requires highly customizable reporting, advanced CRM tools, or enterprise-level operations. Larger properties with complex needs might find Sirvoy’s features limiting.
Hotello PMS offers a dependable, adaptable solution for hotels seeking long-term scalability, but it lacks recent public reviews or rating data, making its current performance uncertain. Its core strengths likely include reliability and customization for larger or established properties.
Sirvoy, with its 95 reviews and high recent ratings, stands out for ease of use, excellent support, and a broad feature set that covers essential property management tasks. Its affordability and quick setup make it especially appealing for small to medium-sized hotels.
If your hotel values proven user satisfaction and active community feedback, Sirvoy is the clear choice. For properties aiming for a tailored, enterprise-grade solution with scalability in mind, Hotello might be worth considering, but its current review absence is a concern.
In conclusion, for most hotels today, Sirvoy provides a safer, more validated platform that can meet your operational needs efficiently and reduce your risk of onboarding issues. Hotello remains a potentially strong option for larger establishments planning long-term growth but would benefit from more recent user feedback to confirm its current standing.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
用户称赞该系统在管理预订和宾客信息方面的高效性。然而,某些功能,例如将房间组合成套房或提供套餐优惠,则被认为需要改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及... 部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及集成追加销售功能存在困难。
Sirvoy 提供一定程度的自定义功能,用户认为这有助于根据自身物业的具体需求调整系统。然而,部分用户希望在发票自定义和动态计费选项方面拥有更大的灵活性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) 和 Sirvoy 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) 提供 16 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sirvoy 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Sirvoy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews):否。Sirvoy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Hotello 的 HT Score 为 0,Sirvoy 的为 85。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问