Cloudbeds HMS vs. HotelRunner HMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 1,428 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 1,428 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 intuitiveness and ease of use 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.

HotelRunner 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Cloudbeds HMS 与 HotelRunner HMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 1,428 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
100
0
推荐可能性
91%
98%
易用性
4.6/5
4.6/5
客户支持
4.4/5
4.5/5
性价比
4.3/5
4.6/5
起始价格 From $500/mo From $100/mo
经验证的评价 1,414 14

Cloudbeds HMS 与 HotelRunner HMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 1,428 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management,而 HotelRunner 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Cloudbeds Cloudbeds HotelRunner HotelRunner
优点
+ Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
+ Automation and Efficiency
+ Reservations and Channel Management
+ Reporting and Analytics
缺点
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
货币兑换和金融业务
移动功能

Cloudbeds 对比 HotelRunner:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds HotelRunner HotelRunner
小型(10-24 间客房) #2 675 条评价 #26 7 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #1 235 条评价 #25 1 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #1 51 条评价 #18 0 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #4 5 条评价 #23 0 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds HotelRunner HotelRunner
精品酒店 #1 546 条评价 #20 11 条评价
豪华酒店 #3 245 条评价 #24 2 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #2 145 条评价 #30 0 条评价
长住酒店 #2 96 条评价 #30 0 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds HotelRunner HotelRunner
北美 #2 532 条评价 #27 0 条评价
欧洲 #4 166 条评价 #22 2 条评价
亚太 #3 201 条评价 #16 1 条评价
中东 #3 13 条评价 #2 6 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and HotelRunner HMS hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and growth plans. Both products aim to streamline operations and enhance guest experiences, but Cloudbeds offers a more extensive feature set and larger user base, especially in recent months. With over 1,200 reviews and a high NPS score, Cloudbeds demonstrates a proven track record of customer satisfaction. Conversely, HotelRunner’s simpler platform may appeal to smaller hotels seeking cost-effective, straightforward management.

While Cloudbeds excels in integration and scalability, HotelRunner may suffice for properties prioritizing basic functions at a lower price point. Which product aligns better with your hotel’s current stage and ambitions?

Is Cloudbeds HMS or HotelRunner HMS Better for Hotels?

Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive all-in-one platform with nearly 80 features exclusive to its system, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, revenue management, and a booking engine. HotelRunner, with only three unique features and a smaller partner network, provides core reservation management and online visibility tools. Both products manage reservations and automate tasks, but Cloudbeds’ extensive capabilities support larger, growing hotels with complex needs.

Cloudbeds’s unified platform reduces the need for multiple systems, streamlining daily operations at scale. HotelRunner’s simpler interface may be a better fit for small hotels with limited management requirements. Do you need a broad, integrated system or a straightforward reservation platform?

Cloudbeds vs HotelRunner: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a full-featured PMS integrated with channel management, revenue tools, and automation, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its large review base and recent positive feedback show it’s trusted by properties of all sizes, especially boutiques, hostels, and resorts aiming for growth.

If your property is small, with basic reservation and online visibility needs, HotelRunner could be sufficient, especially given its lower starting price and native marketing tools like email marketing and POS. For properties planning to expand or needing advanced reporting and integrations, Cloudbeds’s richer feature set is more suitable.

Are you focused on growth and operational efficiency? Or do you just need simple reservation management?

Is Cloudbeds or HotelRunner Easier to Use?

Cloudbeds boasts a user-friendly interface with an average ease-of-use rating of 4.58/5, praised for quick onboarding and staff adoption. Reviewers highlight its intuitive navigation, which helps reduce training times and simplifies complex tasks like channel management and revenue optimization.

HotelRunner scores slightly higher at 4.64/5, with users appreciating its straightforward design and efficiency. Its platform is praised for enabling hotels to control reservations and simplify daily operations. Edge: HotelRunner.

Which Has Better Features: Cloudbeds or HotelRunner?

Cloudbeds’s platform includes over 78 features exclusive to its system, such as multi-lingual support, online check-in, automated night audits, housekeep mobile apps, and advanced revenue management tools. HotelRunner offers only three features unique to its platform, mainly native email marketing, POS, and gift vouchers.

While both systems share 12 core features, Cloudbeds’s extensive feature count and deeper operational tools give it a significant advantage. If your hotel requires comprehensive management capabilities, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Cloudbeds or HotelRunner?

Cloudbeds has a strong reputation for customer support, rated 4.38/5, with recent reviews emphasizing quick, attentive responses. Users appreciate their support team’s responsiveness, with comments like, “They got everything I need and respond immediately.”

HotelRunner’s support rating of 4.5/5 indicates solid performance, with reviews praising its helpfulness. However, Cloudbeds’s larger user base and detailed feedback make its support slightly more reliable. Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has More Integrations: Cloudbeds or HotelRunner?

Cloudbeds boasts over 190 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment processors, property management, and revenue systems. Shared integrations include Expedia, Airbnb, Stripe, and others, with Cloudbeds offering unique integrations like Cloudbeds itself, Trevo, and Umi Digital.

HotelRunner has 17 verified partners, mostly within the hospitality and POS sectors, with fewer external integrations. For seamless operations across multiple channels and partners, Cloudbeds’s extensive network offers a broader reach. Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Cloudbeds or HotelRunner?

Cloudbeds’s overall rating of 4.62/5 and recent reviews from diverse property types—boutiques, hostels, resorts—show widespread satisfaction. Properties like The ZERO Hotels and Yugo praise its ease of use, automation, and revenue growth capabilities, reflecting positive recent feedback.

HotelRunner’s perfect 5/5 ratings from its small sample size highlight user satisfaction but lack the depth and volume of Cloudbeds’ reviews. Cloudbeds’s larger, more recent review base indicates a stronger, more consistent reputation. Edge: Cloudbeds.

How Much Do Cloudbeds and HotelRunner Cost?

Cloudbeds’s pricing starts at $500/month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise-level capabilities. HotelRunner’s basic plan begins at $100/month, offering a lower entry point, but lacks detailed pricing for advanced features.

Pricing reflects the scope and complexity of each platform. For hotels seeking a full-featured system with extensive integrations, Cloudbeds’s higher cost is justified; smaller properties may prefer HotelRunner’s affordability.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Cloudbeds?

  • Hotels that need a scalable, all-in-one platform with extensive features.
  • Properties aiming for automation and revenue management.
  • Hotels planning to grow geographically or operationally.
  • Teams that prefer integrated booking, PMS, and channel management.
  • Hotels that value detailed reporting and multi-lingual support.

Not ideal if:

  • You operate a small property with minimal management needs.
  • Budget constraints limit investment in a full platform.
  • Your team prefers a simple, lightweight reservation system.

What Type of Hotel Should Use HotelRunner?

  • Small hotels or boutique properties needing an easy-to-use solution.
  • Hotels focusing on online visibility and direct bookings.
  • Properties with limited operational complexity and staff resources.
  • Hotels that want native marketing tools like email marketing and POS.

Not ideal if:

  • You require advanced revenue management or extensive integrations.
  • Your property is large or expanding rapidly.
  • You need a highly customizable or multi-property platform.

Cloudbeds vs HotelRunner: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Cloudbeds’s core advantage is its expansive feature set and proven reliability across diverse property types, especially in recent, high-volume reviews. Its ability to serve hotels at every stage—from boutique to resort—makes it a versatile choice for growth-focused hoteliers.

Choose Cloudbeds if you need a comprehensive, scalable management system that supports automation, integrations, and advanced revenue tools. Its extensive reviews and recent customer satisfaction cement its status as the top recommendation.

Opt for HotelRunner if your hotel prioritizes ease of use, affordability, and basic online presence management. Its simplicity and native marketing features are ideal for small hotels seeking straightforward daily operations.

In summary, Cloudbeds is the superior choice for most hotels seeking a robust management platform with proven performance, while HotelRunner suits smaller properties with limited needs or tighter budgets.

Cloudbeds HMS 和 HotelRunner HMS 的价格是多少?

酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Cloudbeds Cloudbeds HotelRunner HotelRunner
Starting Price From $500/mo From $100/mo

Cloudbeds HMS 有哪些 HotelRunner HMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cloudbeds HMS 和 HotelRunner HMS 共享 12 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds HotelRunner HotelRunner
2路实时集成
PMS 连接性
分析仪表板
原生电子邮件营销
多种语言
库存管理
礼品卡
销售点
集中的用户和角色管理

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 69 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:Cloudbeds 对比 HotelRunner(按业务目标)

我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
Cloudbeds Himmapana Villas 中型
+ Growth in direct bookings: the combination of a strong social media presence and an effective online booking and payment system has led to a significant increase in direct bookings.
+ Operational efficiency: the adoption of a simple yet effective hotel management system has streamlined day-to-day operations, efficiently handling over 2,000 bookings annually, including special guest requests.
+ Remote management flexibility: the use of a cloud-based platform allows for the convenient remote management of the property, enabling operations to be handled effectively both on-site and during travel.

"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."

Thomas K. Petersen
Thomas K. Petersen
Managing Partner
HotelRunner HotelRunner

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

提高运营效率
Cloudbeds Flor Parks 小型
+ 17% increase in online reviews
+ 11% of monthly bookings from Google Free Listings
+ Fully integrated booking engine & channel manager

"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."

V
Victor Menor
Operations Manager
HotelRunner HotelRunner

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

改善宾客体验
Cloudbeds The Pad Silverthorne 小型
+ 60% direct bookings in year one
+ 95% guest rating with 1000+ reviews
+ High OTA click-through rates, with lower cancellation rates

"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."

Kevin Bowen
Kevin Bowen
Director of Operations
HotelRunner HotelRunner

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Cloudbeds 对比 HotelRunner:总结

Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds
4.6/5 来自 1,414 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

Intuitiveness and Ease of Use 94% 正面

Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.

Automation and Efficiency 88% 正面

The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.

Reservations and Channel Management 100% 正面

Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

Reservation Flexibility and Editing 75% 负面

The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.

货币兑换和金融业务 75% 负面

人们注意到货币转换的准确性存在问题,尤其是在多币种交易中。用户反映存在一些差异,影响了对账流程。改进货币转换配置可以简化财务管理。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #1 vs #18
中型(25-74 间客房) #1 vs #25
小型(10-24 间客房) #2 vs #26
超大型(200+ 间客房) #4 vs #23

独特功能

PMS 连接性 分析仪表板 库存管理 2路实时集成 集中的用户和角色管理
4.6/5 易用性 4.4/5 客户支持 189 个集成
访问官网
HotelRunner
HotelRunner
4.9/5 来自 14 条评价

独特功能

销售点 礼品卡 原生电子邮件营销
4.6/5 易用性 4.5/5 客户支持 17 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 HotelRunner 5.0 vs 4.6 (+0.4)

关于 Cloudbeds HMS 与 HotelRunner HMS 的常见问题

Cloudbeds HMS 能否替代 HotelRunner HMS?

这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds HMS 和 HotelRunner HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds HMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HotelRunner HMS 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Cloudbeds HMS 或 HotelRunner HMS 是否提供免费方案?

Cloudbeds HMS:否。HotelRunner HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Cloudbeds HMS 和 HotelRunner HMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,HotelRunner 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息