The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 41 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
HotelRunner 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Feedback Management.
Noovy 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Payment Requests.
基于 HTR 上 41 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 14 | 27 |
在分析了 41 条经验证的评价后,HotelRunner 用户最看重其 ,而 Noovy 用户则强调 易于使用, 通道连通性, 一体化功能。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
通道连通性
▾
|
|
|
+
一体化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
收益管理
▾
|
|
|
−
翻译问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 7 条评价 | #27 13 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #25 1 条评价 | #19 11 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #18 0 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #23 0 条评价 | #15 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #20 11 条评价 | #21 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #24 2 条评价 | #34 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #30 0 条评价 | #33 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #30 0 条评价 | #28 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #27 0 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #22 2 条评价 | #12 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #16 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #2 6 条评价 | #11 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel management platform can significantly impact your daily operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both HotelRunner HMS and Noovy aim to streamline your hotel’s processes, but they differ in approach, features, and market focus. HotelRunner offers a more established presence with a broader regional footprint and a higher review count, while Noovy boasts a richer set of features with a newer, more modern interface. Which product aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
HotelRunner HMS and Noovy both seek to simplify hotel management, but they do so with different strengths. HotelRunner emphasizes its ease of use, strong online presence tools, and a solid reputation among boutique hotels and smaller properties. Noovy, on the other hand, provides a more extensive feature set, including integrated guest profiles, online check-in/out, and real-time reporting, which are crucial for larger or tech-savvy properties.
HotelRunner’s platform is praised for its user-friendly interface, with a 4.64/5 ease of use rating based on 14 reviews, most highlighting its intuitive design and straightforward onboarding. Conversely, Noovy scores slightly lower at 4.62/5 but benefits from a higher review count (21 reviews) and more recent feedback, making its user experience very reliable. While HotelRunner’s recent reviews are sparse, Noovy’s recent reviews consistently praise its speed and connectivity.
Both platforms solve core hotel management problems — reservations, distribution, and guest communication. Yet, HotelRunner’s more established presence and recent review activity give it a slight edge for reliability and community trust. Are you prioritizing recent user feedback or a platform with a proven track record?
If your hotel primarily needs a straightforward, easy-to-manage system with strong online visibility tools, HotelRunner is a solid choice. It appeals especially to boutique hotels and smaller properties that value simplicity and reliable support. Its affordability at $100/month makes it attractive for properties looking for cost-effective solutions without sacrificing core functionalities.
If your hotel requires a broader feature set — including guest profiles, online check-in/out, real-time reporting, and integrated payment requests — Noovy is the better fit. It caters to properties that want an all-in-one management system with extensive automation, especially those with higher guest volumes or more complex operations. Its pricing at €5 per room per month is competitive given its feature depth.
In terms of user ratings, HotelRunner’s high score (5/5) and recent reviews indicate strong user satisfaction, especially among boutique hotels. Noovy’s slightly lower ease of use rating (4.62/5) is offset by more recent positive reviews focused on speed and connectivity, making it ideal for tech-forward hotels. Your choice depends on whether you favor simplicity and support or comprehensive features and automation.
HotelRunner garners a 4.64/5 rating for ease of use, with reviewers highlighting its user-friendly interface and quick onboarding process. Its simple navigation and minimal learning curve make staff training faster, which is vital if you’re onboarding new team members frequently.
Noovy’s ease of use rating is very close at 4.62/5, with reviews emphasizing its speed and straightforward operation. Users praise its clean design and efficient workflows, especially for booking and guest communication tasks. Both platforms are highly rated for usability, but HotelRunner’s slightly higher score and more positive recent feedback suggest a marginal advantage.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner offers 12 shared features, including basic reservation management, online presence tools, and guest feedback management. Unique to HotelRunner are features like website development, gift vouchers, and guest feedback management, which support marketing and guest engagement.
Noovy boasts a far more extensive feature set, with 38 features including direct billing, automated night audits, guest CRM, real-time reporting, online check-in/out, tablet kiosk, and integrated payment terminals. Its automation capabilities and comprehensive guest management tools are ideal for larger hotels or those seeking extensive operational automation.
Given the sheer number of features, Noovy clearly leads in feature depth, especially for operational automation and guest engagement.
Edge: Noovy.
HotelRunner maintains a customer support rating of 4.5/5, with reviews praising its prompt assistance and effective onboarding. Users often mention that support is readily available and helpful, especially for small to mid-sized hotels.
Noovy scores slightly higher with a 4.71/5 support rating, with reviews emphasizing its friendly, fast, and reliable support. Customers appreciate its responsiveness and the availability of support via phone and chat, noting that support is a key reason they prefer Noovy.
While both are highly rated, Noovy’s recent reviews highlight a slight edge in support quality, especially for properties that rely heavily on timely assistance for complex automation features.
Edge: Noovy.
HotelRunner integrates with 17 verified partners, including major OTAs like Airbnb, Expedia, and Booking.com, plus payment providers like Stripe. Its integrations are sufficient for most boutique and small hotels to manage distribution and payments.
Noovy offers 40 verified integrations, including industry leaders like Omnibees, SiteMinder, and RevControl, alongside shared partners such as IDeaS and Stripe. Its broader integration ecosystem supports larger hotel chains and properties with diverse revenue management and distribution needs.
With more than double the integrations, Noovy’s extensive connectivity makes it more adaptable for hotels with complex distribution channels.
Edge: Noovy.
HotelRunner’s reviews are all 5/5, with 14 reviews, predominantly from boutique hotels with high satisfaction scores. Recent feedback indicates users appreciate its ease of use and support, especially among small, independent, or boutique properties.
Noovy’s 21 reviews also average 5/5, with recent reviews emphasizing speed, connectivity, and automation features. Its user base includes a higher proportion of larger or branded hotels, which value its extensive automation and real-time reporting.
Both platforms receive top ratings, but Noovy’s higher review count and recent positive feedback suggest it has a slightly broader appeal among various hotel segments.
Edge: Noovy.
HotelRunner charges a flat fee of $100/month, with no trial or implementation fees, making it a predictable and affordable option for small to medium-sized hotels. Its pricing aligns with its core feature set and regional focus.
Noovy’s pricing is €5 per room per month, which scales with your hotel size. It does not offer a free trial but provides a comprehensive all-in-one system at a competitive monthly rate, reflecting its extensive features and automation capabilities.
While HotelRunner offers a lower entry point, Noovy’s per-room pricing can be more cost-effective for larger hotels with many rooms, especially given its advanced automation tools.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive automation, real-time reporting, or advanced guest management features.
Not ideal if you are a small boutique seeking a simple, budget-friendly solution without extensive automation or integrations.
HotelRunner HMS and Noovy serve different hotel segments and operational needs. HotelRunner’s strength lies in its simplicity, regional presence, and cost, making it ideal for boutique and independent hotels that value ease of use and online visibility. Noovy stands out with its extensive features, automation, and integrations, suited for larger or more complex hotels that want a fully connected management platform.
Choose HotelRunner if you value a straightforward, affordable solution with a proven track record and strong support. Opt for Noovy if your hotel demands advanced automation, real-time analytics, and extensive connectivity to streamline larger-scale operations.
Ultimately, your decision should depend on your hotel’s size, complexity, and future growth plans. Both platforms are highly rated, but Noovy’s recent reviews and feature depth give it a slight edge for tech-enabled properties seeking more automation and connectivity.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,HotelRunner HMS 和 Noovy 共享 12 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 29 项功能存在差异。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
人们经常提到该软件的用户友好界面和对新员工的易于培训的特点,这使得它甚至适合那些技术背景较少的员工。
HotelConnect 与 Booking.com 和 Expedia 等 OTA 的直接连接被视为一大优势,简化了分销并消除了渠道经理成本。
用户非常欣赏 HotelConnect 将 PMS、渠道管理器、预订引擎、收入管理和客户沟通整合到一个平台,减少了对多个系统的需求并降低了成本。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
与收入管理相关的功能,包括详细的报告工具和费率日历,因有助于优化酒店收入而受到赞赏。
其中提到了一些翻译问题,特别是英语以外的语言,造成了一些不便。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。HotelRunner HMS 和 Noovy 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。HotelRunner HMS 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Noovy 提供 40 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Noovy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
HotelRunner HMS:否。Noovy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HotelRunner 的 HT Score 为 0,Noovy 的为 64。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问