The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 家政软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #12 2 条评价 | #5 13 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #11 23 条评价 | #4 85 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #12 4 条评价 | #2 62 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #13 1 条评价 | #5 9 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #11 12 条评价 | #4 74 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | #3 73 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #12 11 条评价 | #2 70 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #17 1 条评价 | #8 11 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 3 条评价 | #8 10 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 27 条评价 | #3 132 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #8 1 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #2 7 条评价 |
Choosing the right housekeeping software can significantly impact your hotel's daily operations, guest satisfaction, and staff productivity. Both Hoxell and hub OS Housekeeping aim to streamline departmental coordination and improve efficiency, but they approach this goal differently. Hoxell offers a more integrated, feature-rich platform with a strong focus on departmental communication and maintenance management, whereas hub OS provides a user-friendly, department-connected solution emphasizing task automation and real-time updates. Which solution aligns better with your hotel's specific needs?
Hoxell and hub OS both serve to automate and improve housekeeping and maintenance, but their core strengths diverge. Hoxell emphasizes seamless departmental integration, real-time task tracking, and an extensive suite of features, including a dedicated maintenance module and marketing tools like MyPage. Conversely, hub OS focuses heavily on task automation, immediate guest request handling, and connecting departments through a mobile-centered interface. With Hoxell's 28 reviews and recent feedback, it has a more established reputation, while hub OS's 161 reviews across multiple regions reflect broader market presence and user confidence. Which approach better suits your hotel's operational style?
If your hotel needs a highly integrated platform that combines operational efficiency with marketing tools and detailed departmental communication, Hoxell is the better fit. Its rich feature set, including real-time task tracking and multi-property monitoring, appeals to properties seeking comprehensive control. If your hotel requires a straightforward, mobile-friendly solution that boosts housekeeping productivity and enhances guest request response times, hub OS offers a more intuitive experience. For hotels prioritizing broad regional support and extensive integration options, hub OS’s larger partner network and 161 reviews make it a safer choice.
Hoxell's interface is highly rated at 4.89/5, praised for being intuitive and visually organized, which facilitates staff onboarding and daily operation. Users mention that even minimal-tech staff find it manageable, with quick adoption across departments. hub OS scores slightly lower at 4.86/5, but reviews highlight its straightforward mobile interface that many staff find easy to navigate, especially for task management. However, some users report occasional mobile app performance issues. Edge: Hoxell.
Hoxell leads with 17 exclusive features, including a lost & found module, late checkouts, deep cleaning, inspection tools, analytics dashboards, and open API, providing a broader scope for hotel automation and customization. hub OS offers only one unique feature—an open API—while sharing the core features common to both platforms. This makes Hoxell more adaptable for diverse operational needs. Edge: Hoxell.
Hoxell consistently receives top ratings for customer support at 4.98/5, with reviews emphasizing their quick, attentive responses and proactive assistance. Users describe support as "responsive and helpful," often resolving issues promptly, which minimizes downtime. hub OS also scores well at 4.8/5, with praise for its support team, but some reviews note occasional delays in troubleshooting, especially regarding mobile app performance. Edge: Hoxell.
hub OS boasts 23 verified partners compared to Hoxell's 12, including notable integrations like SAP, Infor, and other industry-specific systems. Both platforms share four common partners, such as Oracle Hospitality and Mews, but hub OS's broader partner network can facilitate easier integration in complex hotel tech stacks. If extensive integration options are a priority, hub OS holds a slight edge.
Hoxell's overall review score of 4.94/5 is slightly higher than hub OS’s 4.88/5, with recent reviews reinforcing its strong reputation. Hoteliers in luxury and boutique segments particularly praise Hoxell’s user-friendly design and comprehensive features, reflected in its 25 reviews with an average rating of 4.94. In contrast, hub OS’s 142 recent reviews maintain a high rating at 4.88, with many users emphasizing its ease of use and productivity improvements. Edge: Hoxell.
Both platforms are priced at a flat $300.00 monthly fee, with no implementation fees, freemium options, or tiered plans. This straightforward pricing structure simplifies budgeting and comparison, making the decision more about feature fit rather than cost.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with limited tech needs, or prefers a very lightweight solution.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a highly customizable platform with extensive departmental modules like deep cleaning or marketing tools.
Hoxell and hub OS both streamline hotel operations but serve different priorities. Hoxell’s core advantage is its rich feature set, comprehensive departmental integration, and high ratings driven by a smaller but dedicated user base. It is well-suited for hotels seeking an all-in-one operational and marketing platform that scales across properties.
hub OS excels in ease of use, mobile task management, and broad integration capabilities, making it ideal for hotels that want a straightforward, department-connected solution with extensive system partnerships. Its larger user base and regional coverage give it an edge for hotels operating in diverse markets.
If your focus is on detailed departmental control, marketing, and multi-property oversight, choose Hoxell. For a more flexible, mobile-first approach with broad integration options, hub OS is the better choice.
Overall, Hoxell’s more recent reviews and higher overall score make it the more reliable option for hoteliers prioritizing features and support.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常提到 Hoxell 如何简化日常运营并提高生产力。该工具有助于管理工作班次、实时跟踪任务并协调维护,最终节省时间并使运营更加顺畅。
Hoxell 通过高效的任务跟踪和简化的内部沟通帮助酒店保持高质量标准,这直接影响了客人的满意度。该工具还通过快速解决维护问题和保持客房服务协调一致来增强客... Hoxell 通过高效的任务跟踪和简化的内部沟通帮助酒店保持高质量标准,这直接影响了客人的满意度。该工具还通过快速解决维护问题和保持客房服务协调一致来增强客户服务能力。
该工具的直观界面因其易于操作而广受好评,简化了培训和日常使用。即使是技术经验最少的员工也觉得它易于操作,从而促进了部门间更顺利的采用和使用。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多用户欣赏 Hoxell 的集成能力,但有些用户指出该软件与他们的物业管理系统 (PMS) 集成存在挑战,特别是在客人推荐和沟通错误方面。
Hoxell 提供了强大的报告功能,但一些用户提到需要更多可定制的选项和改进与其他系统的集成,以实现更好的报告下载和编辑功能。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Hub OS 显著提高了客房部、维修部和前台等部门的任务管理效率。该系统改善了沟通、任务委派和跟踪,从而简化了操作并提高了生产率。不过,一些评论指出,附加功... Hub OS 显著提高了客房部、维修部和前台等部门的任务管理效率。该系统改善了沟通、任务委派和跟踪,从而简化了操作并提高了生产率。不过,一些评论指出,附加功能可以进一步增强任务管理。
虽然 Hub OS 因其灵活性和定制功能而受到赞赏,但一些用户指出,如果没有技术支持,某些定制和个性化设置很难实现。人们希望软件中能有更多自助服务选项,尤其是... 虽然 Hub OS 因其灵活性和定制功能而受到赞赏,但一些用户指出,如果没有技术支持,某些定制和个性化设置很难实现。人们希望软件中能有更多自助服务选项,尤其是与移动应用程序和用户界面相关的选项。
Hub OS 的客房管理模块被高度赞扬,被誉为改变游戏规则的创新,大大提高了效率和生产力。它使员工能够查看房间状态、及时报告问题并有效地管理任务。几篇评论特... Hub OS 的客房管理模块被高度赞扬,被誉为改变游戏规则的创新,大大提高了效率和生产力。它使员工能够查看房间状态、及时报告问题并有效地管理任务。几篇评论特别提到,该系统有助于保持较高的客房清洁度分数。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Hub OS 因其与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的无缝集成而备受赞誉,它使人们能够更轻松地在一个地方高效地管理各种酒店业务,如客房服务和维护。尽管如此,一些评论提到偶... Hub OS 因其与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的无缝集成而备受赞誉,它使人们能够更轻松地在一个地方高效地管理各种酒店业务,如客房服务和维护。尽管如此,一些评论提到偶尔会出现延迟和同步集成问题,特别是与 SAP 和 Opera 等系统的集成。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Hoxell 和 hub OS Housekeeping 共享许多核心 Housekeeping Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hoxell 提供 12 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 hub OS Housekeeping 提供 23 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Hoxell 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hoxell:否。hub OS Housekeeping:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Housekeeping Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Hoxell 的 HT Score 为 74,hub OS 的为 34。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问