The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 93 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
HRS Hospitality & Retail ... 表现出色 .
innRoad 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
基于 HTR 上 93 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 93 |
在分析了 93 条经验证的评价后,HRS Hospitality & Retail ... 用户最看重其 ,而 innRoad 用户则强调 24/7客户支持, 用户界面, 定制和灵活性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| HRS Hospitality & Retail ... |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
24/7客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
+
报告功能
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
性能问题和错误
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | HRS Hospitality & Retail ... |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #20 12 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #16 4 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #19 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | HRS Hospitality & Retail ... |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #11 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #20 11 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #17 8 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #11 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | HRS Hospitality & Retail ... |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #4 83 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #24 5 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #22 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right channel management software can dramatically impact your hotel's operations, visibility, and revenue. Both HRS by HRS Hospitality & Retail and innRoad aim to streamline distribution and booking processes, but they approach it differently. HRS's very limited public review presence and lack of recent feedback contrast sharply with innRoad’s active user base and recent positive reviews. Are you ready to prioritize proven support and features?
HRS Hospitality & Retail offers a platform with zero publicly available reviews and a score of 0/5, suggesting limited user feedback or recent activity. Meanwhile, innRoad boasts over 64 reviews in the last six months, a 4.88/5 rating, and a 91% likelihood to recommend, indicating active ongoing support and user satisfaction. Given the lack of recent reviews for HRS, it’s difficult to assess its current effectiveness compared to innRoad’s proven track record.
HRS’s absence of recent reviews raises concerns about ongoing performance, support, and feature updates. innRoad’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use, responsive customer service, and a strong support infrastructure, making it a safer choice for hotels that need reliable, current solutions. Do you want a platform with current user feedback or one with little recent activity?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, well-supported channel management system with high user satisfaction, innRoad is the clear choice. It’s suitable for a wide range of property types, especially small hotels, bed & breakfasts, inns, and motels, with a proven track record supported by recent reviews and active user engagement.
If your hotel primarily operates in regions where HRS has a presence or has specific needs aligned with HRS’s offerings, you might consider it. But keep in mind, the lack of recent feedback makes it hard to verify if it still delivers on its promises today. innRoad’s extensive features, ease of use, and active support make it the safer, more reliable option for most hotels.
innRoad’s interfaces receive an average 4.53/5 rating, with users describing it as user-friendly and easy to adopt. Customers praise its straightforward onboarding process, with support that helps staff quickly become proficient, and a UI that’s generally intuitive.
HRS, on the other hand, scores a 0/5 in ease of use, with no recent reviews to gauge usability or onboarding experience. Its unknown interface and support quality raise doubts about how readily your team could adapt or benefit from its platform. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad offers 49 features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, a property management system, booking engine, group bookings, pricing intelligence, guest communication, and more. These features directly support operations and revenue generation, even offering integrations with popular booking and management tools.
HRS has no publicly listed features or recent updates, making it impossible to compare its capabilities. innRoad’s broad feature set and active development provide clear advantages. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s support ratings are high at 4.64/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness, comprehensive onboarding, and ongoing training. Review quotes describe their support as “responsive,” “knowledgeable,” and “supportive,” with extensive training included.
HRS lacks recent support reviews, making it impossible to assess current support quality. Its support record is unknown, and the absence of recent feedback suggests it may not be as reliable or active as innRoad. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad connects with 34 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, Airbnb, and Google, plus integrations with QuickBooks, Revinate, and more. It offers unlimited channels, real-time updates, and a full suite of integrations for operational efficiency.
HRS provides no publicly available data on integrations or partners, making it impossible to verify its connectivity options. innRoad’s extensive and active integration network offers a significant advantage. Edge: innRoad.
InnRoad’s recent reviews and high ratings (4.88/5) from 64 reviews, mostly from small hotels, inns, and motels, reflect strong satisfaction across property types and regions. Hotels note increased revenue, ease of use, and excellent support as key benefits.
HRS’s review count is zero, and its star rating is 0/5, giving no recent indication of user satisfaction or effectiveness. Given the active, positive feedback for innRoad, it clearly has the higher reputation among hoteliers. Edge: innRoad.
Both products list no publicly available pricing, which is common in enterprise or bespoke solutions. You’ll need to contact vendors directly for quotes, although innRoad emphasizes its transparent, value-oriented approach.
Given the lack of transparency, your decision should consider the overall value, features, and support rather than price alone. innRoad’s proven ROI and customer satisfaction suggest it offers good value for small to mid-sized hotels.
Not ideal if you’re looking for broad features, active support, and recent user feedback, as HRS’s current platform details are unavailable.
Not ideal if your hotel operates in a large enterprise setting needing extensive customization or if you require an off-the-shelf solution with regional restrictions.
innRoad stands out with a proven track record, active reviews, and a comprehensive feature set, making it a reliable choice for most hotels. Its high user ratings and recent positive feedback show it continues to meet industry needs effectively.
HRS, with no recent reviews or publicly available data, presents a risky choice unless you have specific regional or contractual reasons to consider it. Its lack of visibility into current capabilities makes innRoad the safer, more dependable option.
If you want a platform with recent, high-quality reviews, active support, and extensive features, innRoad is the clear leader. For hotels seeking a well-supported, user-friendly, integrated channel manager, innRoad should be your top pick.
渠道经理 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| HRS Hospitality & Retail ... |
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,HRS 和 innRoad Channel Manager 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | HRS Hospitality & Retail ... |
|
|---|---|---|
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 37 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
全天候客户支持因其可用性和响应性而受到称赞。用户强调技术团队的支持性和知识渊博性,这对于及时解决技术问题至关重要。
用户界面通常被描述为用户友好且直观,便于培训新员工。但是,一些用户认为某些区域(如团体预订模块)可以从更现代、更精简的设计中受益。
用户看重软件的自定义选项,尤其是面向客人的外观和计费功能。但是,在更直观的界面和额外的自定义功能方面仍有改进空间。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户报告了偶尔出现的错误和性能问题,例如系统冻结和加载时间缓慢。这些故障虽然通常可以控制,但可能会扰乱操作并影响用户满意度。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。HRS 和 innRoad Channel Manager 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。HRS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad Channel Manager 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad Channel Manager 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
HRS:否。innRoad Channel Manager:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HRS Hospitality & Retail ... 的 HT Score 为 0,innRoad 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问