The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 349 条经验证的评价后,eviivo 用户最看重其 支持和入职体验, 易于使用且界面直观, 全面的功能集,而 innRoad 用户则强调 24/7客户支持, 用户界面, 定制和灵活性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持和入职体验
▾
|
+
24/7客户支持
▾
|
|
+
易于使用且界面直观
▾
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
+
全面的功能集
▾
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
|
+
节省时间的好处
▾
|
+
报告功能
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
−
性能问题和错误
▾
|
|
−
技术和显示问题
▾
|
|
|
−
定价和订阅
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 66 条评价 | #9 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 21 条评价 | #20 12 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 5 条评价 | #16 4 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 2 条评价 | #19 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #9 38 条评价 | #11 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #8 42 条评价 | #20 11 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #9 24 条评价 | #17 8 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 25 条评价 | #11 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #6 21 条评价 | #4 83 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 194 条评价 | #24 5 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #25 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #20 2 条评价 | #22 0 条评价 |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ CM and innRoad Channel Manager depends on your hotel’s specific needs. Both products address online distribution and booking synchronization but diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market focus. With eviivo’s extensive reviews and recent feedback, it’s clear they lead in user confidence, but how does that translate into your hotel’s operations?
Eviivo excels in multi-property management and global OTA connectivity, while innRoad emphasizes real-time OTA integration and guest management. Are you prioritizing ease of use or feature depth? Let’s explore.
Both eviivo and innRoad serve as central hubs for managing online bookings, preventing overbookings, and updating rates. However, eviivo is more tailored toward small to medium properties, vacation rentals, and B&Bs, offering an intuitive interface and multi-property controls. innRoad, by contrast, is built with larger hotels and chains in mind, emphasizing robust integrations, guest management, and extensive customization.
Recent reviews favor eviivo due to its higher review count (231 vs. 64) and more recent feedback, which boost confidence in its ongoing development. Does your hotel need a straightforward solution for multiple properties or a more integrated, feature-rich platform? How important is recent user feedback to your decision?
If your hotel operates multiple properties, especially B&Bs or vacation rentals, eviivo’s multi-property management and global OTA connectivity make it ideal. Its user-friendly design and high customer satisfaction (97% likelihood to recommend) suit smaller teams seeking simplicity.
If your hotel needs advanced guest management, detailed reporting, and comprehensive integrations, innRoad’s extensive feature set (36 unique features vs. 2 in eviivo) and high user ratings (4.88/5) are more suitable. InnRoad’s focus on larger operations and detailed control benefits hotels with more complex operations.
In summary, choose eviivo for ease and quick setup, innRoad for a feature-packed experience supporting larger teams.
eviivo’s ease of use scores 4.65/5, and reviews consistently praise its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Users highlight how even non-tech staff find it simple to manage bookings and channels, with many mentioning quick setup and helpful support.
innRoad also scores well at 4.53/5, with reviews emphasizing its user-friendly guest check-in and rate management. However, some users note performance glitches and slightly outdated sections, which can slow down operations.
Edge: eviivo.
innRoad offers a broader feature set, with 36 unique functionalities including property management, booking engines, group bookings, pricing tools, guest communication, and online support. eviivo provides 15 features overall, with standout capabilities in multi-lingual and multi-currency support.
eviivo’s key strengths include simple OTA connectivity and channel management for small operations, while innRoad’s extensive features support larger hotels needing advanced automation, guest engagement, and customization.
Edge: innRoad.
eviivo boasts a customer support score of 4.78/5, with recent reviews praising its quick, empathetic support and onboarding assistance. Review quotes describe agents as "competent" and "patient," though some users suggest support could be more personalized.
innRoad’s support is rated slightly lower at 4.64/5, but users consistently commend their responsive, knowledgeable team, especially during onboarding. Several reviews mention prompt resolution of bugs and ongoing support.
Edge: eviivo.
innRoad leads slightly with 34 verified partners, offering integrations with major OTAs like Google, Airbnb, and Vrbo, plus tools for credit card processing and guest communication. eviivo has 32 verified partners, including key OTAs and niche booking platforms like Experience Hotel and Hotelchamp.
Both platforms provide extensive connectivity, but innRoad’s slightly broader partner network and deeper integrations with PMS, booking engines, and marketing tools make it more flexible for larger operations.
Edge: innRoad.
eviivo’s reviews are more recent and plentiful, with a strong overall rating of 85.37 on the HTR Score and 97% likelihood to recommend. Their reviews, particularly from vacation rentals and B&Bs, consistently praise ease of use and support.
innRoad’s review score (4.88/5) is based on fewer recent reviews, but property segments like resorts and boutique hotels highly rate the platform. Hotel chains and larger properties seem to favor innRoad’s extensive features.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo charges a flat monthly fee of $700, with no freemium, trial, or implementation fees, making costs predictable for small to medium properties. innRoad doesn’t publicly list pricing, but their model suggests no setup fees and likely custom quotes based on property size.
Since innRoad emphasizes features for larger hotels, their pricing might scale with the complexity, but eviivo’s straightforward rate appeals to smaller operators seeking clarity.
Not ideal if you require extensive guest management, advanced automation, or a highly customizable PMS.
Not ideal if your operation is small, with limited staff or simpler needs.
The core difference lies in their market focus: eviivo is tailored toward small, multi-property operators like B&Bs and vacation rentals, while innRoad targets larger hotels needing detailed management tools. If your hotel values simplicity, fast onboarding, and recent positive reviews, eviivo is the clear choice.
Choose eviivo if you want a reliable, easy-to-use platform with high user satisfaction, especially for small to mid-sized properties. opt for innRoad if your hotel requires a more expansive feature set, extensive integrations, and supports larger portfolios with complex management needs.
In conclusion, your decision should reflect your property size, operational complexity, and growth plans. For smaller operations seeking ease and recent positive feedback, eviivo stands out. For larger, feature-intensive requirements, innRoad offers a more comprehensive solution.
我们分析了 12 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了Eviivo提供的卓越支持和新用户引导体验,尤其赞扬了客服人员在简化过渡和设置流程方面所发挥的作用。支持团队以其快速、清晰的帮助而著称,这对... 许多评论都强调了Eviivo提供的卓越支持和新用户引导体验,尤其赞扬了客服人员在简化过渡和设置流程方面所发挥的作用。支持团队以其快速、清晰的帮助而著称,这对于确保运营顺畅至关重要。
用户对Eviivo直观易用的平台赞不绝口,该平台简化了预订和渠道管理,即使是不懂技术的用户也能轻松上手。预订、渠道和设置方面的便捷导航显著减少了管理工作。
Eviivo的多种功能,例如多物业管理和集中运营控制,备受好评。用户表示这些功能节省了时间并优化了日常管理,但也有一些用户希望获得更多自定义选项。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然该平台在桌面端的使用体验备受好评,但一些评论批评其移动网站操作繁琐,应用程序缺乏直观性,导致用户在移动中管理预订时面临诸多挑战。
部分用户最初遇到了一些技术问题,例如显示错误,但他们表示这些问题在获得技术支持后很快就得到了解决。用户认为持续的技术改进将有利于整个平台的提升。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
全天候客户支持因其可用性和响应性而受到称赞。用户强调技术团队的支持性和知识渊博性,这对于及时解决技术问题至关重要。
用户界面通常被描述为用户友好且直观,便于培训新员工。但是,一些用户认为某些区域(如团体预订模块)可以从更现代、更精简的设计中受益。
用户看重软件的自定义选项,尤其是面向客人的外观和计费功能。但是,在更直观的界面和额外的自定义功能方面仍有改进空间。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户报告了偶尔出现的错误和性能问题,例如系统冻结和加载时间缓慢。这些故障虽然通常可以控制,但可能会扰乱操作并影响用户满意度。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ CM 和 innRoad Channel Manager 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ CM 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad Channel Manager 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ CM 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ CM:否。innRoad Channel Manager:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 85,innRoad 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问