The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 100 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
HS/3 表现出色 .
roommaster 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
基于 HTR 上 100 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 100 |
在分析了 100 条经验证的评价后,HS/3 用户最看重其 ,而 roommaster 用户则强调 客户支持, 预订管理, 集中式数据管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
+
集中式数据管理
▾
|
|
|
+
云和移动访问
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
|
|
−
用户界面体验
▾
|
|
|
−
团体预订功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #30 26 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #13 54 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #31 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #32 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #22 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #34 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #24 15 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #27 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #10 62 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #29 11 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing between HS/3 (acquired by Mews) and roommaster PMS hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Both platforms aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. HS/3’s zero reviews and limited recent data contrast sharply with roommaster’s active, recent reviews and established customer base. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s current needs and future plans?
HS/3 (acquired by Mews) presents itself as a comprehensive property management system, promising streamlined operations through its integration with third-party tools. However, with no reviews or ratings available, its real-world performance remains unverified. In contrast, roommaster boasts over 83 recent reviews and a well-established presence across multiple regions, giving you a clearer picture of its capabilities and reliability. Given this, the decision boils down to proven performance versus an untested platform.
While HS/3’s promise of a simplified hotel management experience may sound appealing, the absence of user feedback makes it hard to assess its true value. Roommaster, on the other hand, is proven to reduce manual data entry, improve operational accuracy, and support diverse hotel types, from boutique to large resorts. Are you willing to risk unverified claims, or do you prefer a platform with a verified track record?
If your hotel operates in North or South America, or you need a hotel management system with extensive regional support and a proven track record, roommaster is the clear choice. Its strong presence, 83 recent reviews, and 4.33/5 rating demonstrate widespread satisfaction, especially among boutique, resort, and mid-sized properties seeking robust features. Conversely, HS/3 might appeal if you prioritize the potential of a new PMS with integrations from Mews, but without evidence of proven effectiveness, it’s a gamble.
For hotels prioritizing reliability, extensive features, and a long-standing user base, roommaster’s comprehensive suite—over 60 features including revenue management, POS, and automated reporting—makes it the safer, more informed bet. HS/3’s lack of review data and unverified reputation suggest it’s less suited for hotels needing immediate, proven operational improvements.
Based on available ratings, roommaster’s ease of use scores 4.22/5, supported by positive reviews about its intuitive interface and straightforward workflows. Users highlight its user-friendly back-office features, quick onboarding, and minimal hardware needs, making staff adoption smoother. Meanwhile, HS/3’s usability remains unverified due to a lack of reviews or ratings, leaving its user experience uncertain.
Customer feedback on roommaster emphasizes the platform’s efficiency and simplicity, with many praising its drag-and-drop reservation management and real-time data access. Given the absence of real-world data for HS/3, the edge clearly goes to roommaster for ease of use.
roommaster offers over 60 features, including channel management, revenue optimization, integrated POS, guest CRM, online check-in/out, automated reporting, and multi-currency support. These capabilities address nearly every operational need for a mid-sized or larger hotel, especially with its dedicated modules like guest messaging and digital registration. HS/3, by contrast, has no confirmed features or integrations, making it impossible to compare on this front.
The extensive feature set of roommaster, combined with its integration with over 56 verified partners, provides a clear advantage. If you require a feature-rich system that covers all aspects of hotel management, roommaster is the safer choice. HS/3’s absence of verified features leaves its capabilities uncertain.
roommaster’s support ratings hover around 4.25/5, with many users citing quick responses and effective issue resolution. Reviews mention that support staff are knowledgeable and helpful, contributing to smoother onboarding and daily operations. Conversely, HS/3’s support data is nonexistent, making it impossible to evaluate its responsiveness or quality.
Given the importance of reliable support in hotel management, the established positive feedback for roommaster’s customer service heavily favors it. Until HS/3’s support record can be verified, roommaster remains the more dependable option.
roommaster integrates with 56 verified partners, including popular channel managers, POS systems, and revenue tools like Sage, Volo, and GuestCentric. Its open architecture allows seamless data flow across critical hotel operations. In contrast, HS/3 has no verified integrations listed, suggesting limited or unconfirmed compatibility.
For hotels that rely on a variety of third-party tools, roommaster’s extensive partner network provides flexibility and scalability. HS/3’s lack of integration data is a significant drawback, especially for hotels seeking a connected management suite.
roommaster’s recent reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.33/5 overall rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend, especially among boutique, resort, and mid-sized hotels. Hotels praise its operational efficiency, ease of use, and support responsiveness. HS/3, with no reviews or ratings, cannot claim any level of user satisfaction.
The recent and plentiful feedback for roommaster establishes it as the more trusted and validated option. Hoteliers seeking proven satisfaction should prioritize roommaster.
HS/3 does not list any pricing details, making it difficult to evaluate its cost-effectiveness. roommaster charges a flat $500 monthly fee, which includes access to all features and support, with no implementation or additional fees noted.
Considering the value of a well-established, feature-rich platform, roommaster’s transparent pricing offers predictability for hotel budgets. The absence of pricing data for HS/3 complicates its comparison, but the proven feature set and support justify the cost of roommaster.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that roommaster offers an established, feature-rich system supported by extensive user feedback, while HS/3 remains unreviewed and unverified. If your hotel values proven reliability, extensive integrations, and comprehensive support, roommaster is the clear choice.
Choose HS/3 if your hotel is exploring new solutions, willing to accept some risk, and interested in future innovations that might come from Mews’ ecosystem. For immediate, reliable operational improvements, roommaster’s proven track record makes it the smarter investment.
In conclusion, if you want to minimize risk and maximize operational confidence, roommaster’s extensive features, strong support, and active customer base make it the better choice. HS/3’s potential is promising, but without recent reviews or proven performance, it remains a gamble. Prioritize proven systems for your hotel’s growth and efficiency.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,HS/3 (acq Mews) 和 roommaster PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 48 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的... 虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的服务体验。
预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配... 预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配列表和团体入住登记方面仍有改进空间。
RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全... RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全平台上的做法,这显著提升了工作流程效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
RoomMaster的报告生成功能虽然实用,但仍被认为有待改进。用户希望在创建和导出报告方面获得更高的效率和效果,这表明改进功能可以简化分析任务。
一些用户指出需要改进用户体验,尤其强调需要消除重复性任务,例如频繁登录,这会影响日常使用该软件的流畅性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。HS/3 (acq Mews) 和 roommaster PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。HS/3 (acq Mews) 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster PMS 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。roommaster PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.1/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
HS/3 (acq Mews):否。roommaster PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HS/3 的 HT Score 为 0,roommaster 的为 83。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问