The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #48 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #27 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #29 21 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #37 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #42 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #35 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #23 16 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #16 31 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #13 6 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. HS/3, acquired by Mews, is designed to streamline complex hotel management tasks but lacks recent reviews and a clear market presence. Sirvoy, by contrast, is a well-established platform with a strong reputation backed by nearly 100 recent reviews, high customer satisfaction, and extensive features. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize proven ease of use and support or comprehensive functionality and industry coverage.
Both products aim to simplify reservations, front desk operations, and guest communications, but they diverge significantly in their market reach and feature sets. HS/3’s limited reviews and regional presence suggest it’s less tested in dynamic hotel environments, whereas Sirvoy’s recent, plentiful feedback indicates a reliable choice for small and medium-sized properties. Does your hotel need a robust, scalable system or a straightforward, support-focused solution?
HS/3’s core strength is its integration with third-party tools, promising a unified management experience for larger, multi-property hotels. However, it’s a less proven platform, with no recent reviews to validate its current performance or usability. Sirvoy, meanwhile, excels in user-friendliness, with a 4.64/5 ease of use score from 95 reviews, most submitted in the last six months, showing consistent recent satisfaction.
While HS/3 might appeal to hotels seeking deep customization and extensive integration, the lack of active customer feedback and regional presence limits confidence. Sirvoy’s strengths lie in its intuitive interface, excellent support, and clear value for small to medium properties. Which qualities are more vital for your hotel’s growth and daily operations?
HS/3 currently has no rating for ease of use, and no recent reviews to evaluate how intuitive or straightforward it is for staff to learn. This lack of recent feedback makes it difficult to assess onboarding or daily usability. Conversely, Sirvoy scores 4.64 out of 5 based on 95 reviews, with recent feedback praising its simple, logical interface and quick setup.
Most Sirvoy users highlight how new staff can adopt the system rapidly, with some reviews noting the onboarding process is smooth and support is highly responsive. Edge: Sirvoy.
HS/3 offers zero verified features, making it difficult to compare directly. Sirvoy boasts 43 features, including multi-lingual support, channel management, booking engine, guest communication tools, online check-in/out, and integrated payment options. It also provides automation, guest CRM, and mobile functionality, which are absent in HS/3’s profile.
While HS/3 might target hotels needing bespoke integrations, Sirvoy’s broad feature set and proven functionalities make it a practical choice for day-to-day management. Edge: Sirvoy.
HS/3 has no recent or rated reviews for support or onboarding, leaving its support quality uncertain. Sirvoy, with a 4.85/5 support rating from 95 reviews, is consistently praised for its helpful, prompt, and friendly assistance. Many users describe receiving quick responses that resolve issues efficiently, even for complex questions.
Recent reviews emphasize the value of Sirvoy’s support, noting it as a key factor in their positive experience. Edge: Sirvoy.
HS/3’s integration count is zero verified partners, suggesting limited or no out-of-the-box integrations. Sirvoy, by contrast, connects with 21 verified partners including major booking channels like Booking.com, Expedia, and GDS systems, plus tools like TrustYou, Cendyn, and RevControl.
This extensive integration network offers your hotel the ability to synchronize reservations, rates, and guest data across multiple platforms easily. Edge: Sirvoy.
HS/3 has no recent reviews or ratings, so its user satisfaction remains unverified. Sirvoy’s near-perfect score (9.41/5 on NPS) from 95 reviews indicates widespread user approval, especially among small to medium-sized properties like B&Bs, hostels, and boutique hotels.
Property segment reviews show that boutique hotels and bed & breakfasts particularly favor Sirvoy’s balance of simplicity and functionality. Hotels in need of proven support and recent positive feedback should lean toward Sirvoy. Edge: Sirvoy.
HS/3’s pricing remains undisclosed, with no mention of free tiers or trial options. Sirvoy offers a transparent $200 monthly base fee, with no free tier, but includes a 30-day trial to assess its features.
While the costs are comparable for small properties, the value of Sirvoy’s ongoing support and recent feature updates makes it a more predictable investment. HS/3’s pricing and value are unclear, adding risk to your decision.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
HS/3 promises a comprehensive management experience but lacks recent validation, making it a risky choice without further testing. If your hotel has the resources for customization and needs multi-property management, HS/3 could be suitable, but beware of limited support and regional presence.
Sirvoy, by contrast, has proven its value with recent, positive reviews from nearly 100 hoteliers. Its intuitive design, extensive features, and excellent support make it the recommended choice for small and medium-sized properties aiming for straightforward, reliable management.
For hotels seeking a trusted, well-supported platform with broad functionality, Sirvoy stands out as the more certain and practical option. Choose HS/3 only if your hotel requires a highly customized, large-scale solution and you are prepared to navigate its limited recent feedback.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
用户称赞该系统在管理预订和宾客信息方面的高效性。然而,某些功能,例如将房间组合成套房或提供套餐优惠,则被认为需要改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及... 部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及集成追加销售功能存在困难。
Sirvoy 提供一定程度的自定义功能,用户认为这有助于根据自身物业的具体需求调整系统。然而,部分用户希望在发票自定义和动态计费选项方面拥有更大的灵活性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。HS/3 (acq Mews) 和 Sirvoy 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。HS/3 (acq Mews) 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sirvoy 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Sirvoy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
HS/3 (acq Mews):否。Sirvoy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HS/3 的 HT Score 为 0,Sirvoy 的为 85。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问