The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #44 8 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #25 24 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #19 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #24 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #28 24 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #23 26 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #29 8 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #31 6 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 20 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #24 17 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #28 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Infor HMS and Jaras hinges on understanding their core strengths and limitations. Both aim to streamline hotel operations, but their approaches and maturity levels differ significantly. Infor HMS offers a well-established, feature-rich platform with a broad global footprint, while Jaras provides a modern, integrated solution geared toward automation and distribution. Your decision depends on your hotel’s size, complexity, and operational priorities.
Both products address the need for centralized management, but Infor's extensive integrations and longstanding reputation contrast with Jaras's newer, highly automated platform. So, which aligns better with your property’s current needs and future growth plans?
Infor HMS is a comprehensive, cloud-based PMS designed to support a wide variety of hotel types, particularly those seeking deep customization and extensive integrations. Jaras, meanwhile, is a newer, all-in-one platform focused on automation, real-time updates, and distribution efficiency.
Infor’s broad feature set includes guest profiles, CRM, multi-currency, payment processing, and automated night audit, making it suitable for larger or more complex properties. Jaras emphasizes unified reservation management, OTA connectivity, and operational automation, favoring properties that want to streamline distribution and day-to-day tasks quickly.
The core problem both solve is operational complexity, but Infor's long history means it’s more proven for sophisticated needs. Jaras’s modern architecture offers rapid deployment and simplified workflows. Which approach fits your hotel’s maturity and operational style?
If your hotel needs a flexible, highly customizable system with proven integrations and support for complex operations, Infor HMS is the safer choice. Its broad regional presence, 113 verified partners, and multiple hotel segment users make it suitable for established hotels seeking tailored solutions.
Conversely, if your focus is on automation, real-time updates, and expanding online distribution efficiently, Jaras’s single-dashboard approach, with over 150 OTA integrations, is compelling. However, its limited review data and recent market entry mean it’s better suited for properties ready to embrace a newer platform and willing to navigate less tested support.
For hotels prioritizing deep customization and extensive support, go with Infor. If your goal is rapid deployment, automation, and channel management, Jaras might be a good fit.
Infor HMS scores 3.88/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its navigability after familiarization but criticizing its interface aesthetics and update-related glitches. Many users mention that onboarding takes effort but is ultimately manageable with support.
Jaras, with no available user ratings or reviews, remains unassessed on usability. Given its recent market entry and lack of review data, it’s unclear how intuitive or user-friendly it is for everyday hotel staff.
Edge: Infor HMS. Its established user base provides clearer insights into usability, making it the safer bet for teams needing a familiar, if slightly complex, interface.
Infor offers 11 shared features plus 9 exclusive to it, including guest profiles, CRM, mobile app, multi-currency, payment processing, ancillary revenue tracking, custom rates, group functionality, and automated night audit. These features support detailed customization and operational control.
Jaras provides 5 unique features, such as digital registration, guest messaging, base pricing, real-time status updates, and payment requests, emphasizing automation and distribution. However, with no verified user reviews, the practical effectiveness of these features remains unconfirmed.
Edge: Infor HMS. Its larger feature set, proven implementation, and dedicated modules give it a clear advantage for hotels needing comprehensive management capabilities.
Infor scores 4.04/5 for support, with reviews highlighting responsiveness, professionalism, and helpful onboarding assistance. Users appreciate prompt issue resolution and support during system evolution.
Jaras has no review data available on support quality, making it impossible to assess. Given its recent market entry, support experience may vary and lacks the validation of Infor’s established reputation.
Edge: Infor HMS. Its verified, positive support feedback makes it the more reliable choice for hotels valuing service and assistance.
Infor boasts 113 verified partner integrations, including major players like Booking.com, Expedia, and others, allowing seamless connectivity with booking, revenue, and operational systems.
Jaras does not list verified integrations, though it connects with over 150 OTA channels directly. Its platform’s newer status implies potential expansion, but currently, the integration ecosystem is less mature.
Edge: Infor HMS. Its extensive, verified integration network provides reassurance for hotels needing reliable, proven connectivity.
Infor’s 46 reviews in the last six months reveal a 4.04/5 overall rating, with a 74% likelihood to recommend, especially among boutique hotels and independent properties. Recent reviews praise its customization, mobile capabilities, and support.
Jaras has no recent reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction or property segment preferences.
Edge: Infor HMS. Its recent, volume-backed ratings affirm its standing among hoteliers.
Infor does not publicly list pricing, possibly reflecting tiered or bespoke quotes based on hotel size and needs. Its model typically involves licensing and support fees, common for enterprise PMS solutions.
Jaras charges a straightforward $1,000 monthly base fee, with no mention of additional costs or per-room fees. Being newer, its pricing may appeal to smaller properties or those looking for predictable costs.
Given the lack of transparent pricing for Infor, budget-conscious hotels should lean toward Jaras for initial cost clarity.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, budget-limited, or prefers a simple, digital-first platform without extensive customization.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive customization, proven integrations, or relies on a mature support network.
Infor HMS offers a mature, feature-rich platform with proven integrations and a solid support reputation, making it ideal for larger or complex hotels. Its extensive regional presence and customizable modules suit properties prioritizing flexibility and operational control.
Jaras presents a promising, automation-centered platform tailored for properties focused on distribution, real-time updates, and operational efficiency. Its newer status and limited review data suggest it’s best for hotels ready to innovate and willing to navigate potential support uncertainties.
In summary, if your hotel values proven stability and extensive features, Infor is the clear choice. If you prefer a modern, automated solution with straightforward pricing and distribution focus, Jaras is worth exploring further.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Infor HMS 和 Jaras 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Infor HMS 提供 113 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Jaras 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Infor HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 3.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Infor HMS:否。Jaras:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Infor 的 HT Score 为 22,Jaras 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问