Cloudbeds PMS vs. Infor HMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 1,289 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 1,289 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader and Native Email Marketing.

Infor 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and On premise.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Cloudbeds PMS 与 Infor HMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 1,289 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
100
22
推荐可能性
91%
74%
易用性
4.6/5
3.9/5
客户支持
4.4/5
4.1/5
性价比
4.3/5
3.6/5
起始价格 From $600/mo Contact sales
经验证的评价 1,242 47

Cloudbeds PMS 与 Infor HMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 1,289 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 用户友好界面, 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统,而 Infor 用户则强调 易于使用, 报告, 一体化。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Infor Infor
优点
+ 用户友好界面
+ 易于使用
+ 实施与支持
+ 报告
+ 一体化生态系统
+ 一体化
+ 渠道管理
+ 家政模块
缺点
预订管理
支持
报表定制
易于使用
系统速度
更新问题

Cloudbeds 对比 Infor:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Infor Infor
小型(10-24 间客房) #1 592 条评价 #44 8 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #4 212 条评价 #25 24 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #5 42 条评价 #19 9 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #13 4 条评价 #24 2 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Infor Infor
精品酒店 #2 473 条评价 #28 24 条评价
豪华酒店 #4 228 条评价 #23 26 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #6 116 条评价 #29 8 条评价
长住酒店 #2 93 条评价 #31 6 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Infor Infor
北美 #2 435 条评价 #22 20 条评价
欧洲 #7 163 条评价 #24 17 条评价
亚太 #3 226 条评价 #28 1 条评价
中东 #7 11 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and Infor HMS comes down to your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both systems aim to streamline operations and improve guest experiences, but they diverge significantly in user experience, feature depth, and market presence. Cloudbeds offers a more integrated, user-friendly platform with a larger customer base and more recent reviews, making it the stronger choice in today’s hotel tech landscape. Are you ready to make a confident decision?

Is Cloudbeds or Infor Better for Hotels?

Cloudbeds and Infor serve the same fundamental purpose—optimizing hotel management—but their approaches differ. Cloudbeds consolidates reservation, channel management, and booking engine into one intuitive platform, perfect for hotels seeking simplicity and scalability. In contrast, Infor offers a broad, modular system with extensive customization, suited for larger or more complex properties. Which aligns better with your hotel’s operational complexity and tech maturity?

Cloudbeds’s recent surge in reviews—over 81 in the last six months—coupled with a high NPS score of 8.94/10, reflects its growing reputation for ease of use and support. Infor’s reviews, limited to 46, are older and less recent, making its data less reliable for current performance. Are you prioritizing a proven, modern system supported by a vibrant user community?

Cloudbeds vs Infor: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs an all-in-one, easy-to-implement system with high user satisfaction, go with Cloudbeds. It’s ideal for independent, boutique, or hostel properties that value intuitive workflows, robust integrations, and rapid onboarding. If your property is larger, with complex workflows requiring extensive customization, Infor’s flexible modules and deep integration capabilities may suit you better, provided you can tolerate its steeper learning curve and less modern interface.

Given Cloudbeds’s stronger review count and recent feedback, it’s clearly more aligned with current hotelier expectations. For most hotels focused on growth, ease of management, and rapid ROI, Cloudbeds is the safer, more supported choice.

Is Cloudbeds or Infor Easier to Use?

Cloudbeds’s UI scores 4.61/5, with reviews noting its straightforward navigation and minimal training requirements. Users frequently praise its simplicity, even for staff with limited technical experience, and highlight a smooth onboarding process rated 4.45/5. Conversely, Infor’s interface scores 3.88/5, with some users describing it as functional but less visually appealing and intuitive, which can slow staff adoption.

Support and onboarding are critical for staff efficiency; Cloudbeds’s recent reviews emphasize its responsive support and quick setup, while Infor’s onboarding is described as adequate but less standout. Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has Better Features: Cloudbeds or Infor?

Cloudbeds’s platform boasts 46 features exclusive to its ecosystem, including a channel manager, integrated CRS, booking engine, digital registration, guest messaging, and extensive automation tools. These features enable efficient multi-channel distribution, real-time updates, and personalized guest communication—key to modern hospitality.

Infor offers only 2 features unique to its system—guest profiles and on-premise deployment—limiting its differentiation. Most of its strength lies in customizable reports and housekeeping modules, but it lacks the breadth of automation and integrations Cloudbeds provides.

Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Cloudbeds or Infor?

Cloudbeds’s recent reviews highlight a consistently high support score of 4.41/5, with users praising its quick, empathetic responses and proactive assistance. Hoteliers report that support helps resolve issues swiftly, making daily management smoother.

Infor’s support scores 4.04/5, with reviews describing the team as professional and helpful but not as prompt or responsive as Cloudbeds. Some users mention delays during system updates or glitches, which can hinder operations.

Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has More Integrations: Cloudbeds or Infor?

Cloudbeds connects to 190 verified partners, including major channels, payment systems, and third-party apps, with 36 shared partners with Infor. Its extensive marketplace allows for easy expansion and customization to fit diverse property needs.

Infor offers 113 verified partners, notably strong in specialized enterprise integrations like revenue management and work order systems. However, its smaller partner ecosystem limits flexibility and rapid expansion compared to Cloudbeds.

Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Cloudbeds or Infor?

Cloudbeds’s overall rating of 4.63/5, with a recent review count of 81, demonstrates strong current satisfaction across segments, especially boutique hotels and hostels. The platform’s ease of use and support are consistently praised, and properties report significant growth in direct bookings and operational efficiency.

Infor’s overall score of 4.04/5, with only 46 reviews and no recent feedback, makes it harder to gauge current user sentiment. Its ratings for usability and support are middling, and it appears better suited for larger, enterprise-scale properties.

Edge: Cloudbeds.

How Much Do Cloudbeds and Infor Cost?

Cloudbeds charges a starting price of $600/month, with no free tier or implementation fees, making its cost transparent and predictable. Pricing for Infor HMS is not publicly listed, often customized based on property size and modules, which can make budgeting more complex for hoteliers.

For most hotels, Cloudbeds offers a clear, upfront pricing model that aligns with its feature set and ease of deployment. Infor’s custom quotes can be advantageous for large, complex properties with specific needs but may be less accessible for smaller hotels.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Cloudbeds?

  • Hotels seeking an all-in-one, easy-to-deploy platform with a quick learning curve.
  • Properties focused on growing direct bookings and multi-channel distribution.
  • Boutique hotels, hostels, and small chains looking for flexibility and mobile management.
  • Teams that value integrated marketing and automation tools to streamline operations.
  • Not ideal if your hotel needs highly bespoke workflows or extensive third-party customizations beyond Cloudbeds’s market offerings.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Infor?

  • Large properties or hotel groups with complex operational workflows requiring deep customization.
  • Hotels that prefer a modular system and are comfortable with a steeper learning curve.
  • Properties with existing enterprise systems that need comprehensive integration.
  • Teams prioritizing detailed reports and operational control over user interface polish.
  • Not ideal if your hotel values rapid onboarding, modern UI, or prefers cloud-native solutions focused on ease of use.

Cloudbeds vs Infor: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Cloudbeds offers a unified, user-friendly platform with a broad feature set, ideal for hotels aiming to grow quickly without technical complexity. Its recent review volume and high satisfaction scores make it the current market leader for small to mid-sized properties and independent hotels.

Infor provides a highly customizable, scalable PMS better suited for large or enterprise hotels with complex needs, but its less modern interface and fewer recent reviews reduce its appeal for most hoteliers today. If ease of use, support, and rapid deployment matter most, Cloudbeds is the clear winner.

For hotels prioritizing simplicity, integration, and proven support, Cloudbeds is the recommended choice. Larger, more customizable needs may justify considering Infor, but expect longer setup times and ongoing training.

Cloudbeds PMS 和 Infor HMS 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Infor Infor
Starting Price From $600/mo

Cloudbeds PMS 有哪些 Infor HMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cloudbeds PMS 和 Infor HMS 共享 18 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Infor Infor
2路实时集成
PMS 连接性
分析仪表板
在前提
多种语言
客人资料
库存管理
频道管理员

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 36 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:Cloudbeds 对比 Infor(按业务目标)

我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
Cloudbeds Himmapana Villas 中型
+ Growth in direct bookings: the combination of a strong social media presence and an effective online booking and payment system has led to a significant increase in direct bookings.
+ Operational efficiency: the adoption of a simple yet effective hotel management system has streamlined day-to-day operations, efficiently handling over 2,000 bookings annually, including special guest requests.
+ Remote management flexibility: the use of a cloud-based platform allows for the convenient remote management of the property, enabling operations to be handled effectively both on-site and during travel.

"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."

Thomas K. Petersen
Thomas K. Petersen
Managing Partner
Infor Infor

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

提高运营效率
Cloudbeds Flor Parks 小型
+ 17% increase in online reviews
+ 11% of monthly bookings from Google Free Listings
+ Fully integrated booking engine & channel manager

"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."

V
Victor Menor
Operations Manager
Infor Infor

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

改善宾客体验
Cloudbeds The Pad Silverthorne 小型
+ 60% direct bookings in year one
+ 95% guest rating with 1000+ reviews
+ High OTA click-through rates, with lower cancellation rates

"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."

Kevin Bowen
Kevin Bowen
Director of Operations
Infor Infor

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Cloudbeds 对比 Infor:总结

Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds
4.6/5 来自 1,242 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

用户友好界面 100% 正面

Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。

实施与支持 71% 正面

Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。

一体化生态系统 92% 正面

Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

预订管理 47% 负面

Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。

报表定制 50% 负面

尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #5 vs #19
中型(25-74 间客房) #4 vs #25
小型(10-24 间客房) #1 vs #44
超大型(200+ 间客房) #13 vs #24

独特功能

频道管理员 PMS 连接性 分析仪表板 库存管理 2路实时集成
4.6/5 易用性 4.4/5 客户支持 189 个集成
访问官网
Infor
Infor
3.7/5 来自 47 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

易于使用 60% 正面

Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。

报告 67% 正面

报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。

一体化 100% 正面

Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

支持 43% 负面

Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。

易于使用 40% 负面

Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。

独特功能

客人资料 在前提
3.9/5 易用性 4.0/5 客户支持 113 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Cloudbeds 4.6 vs 4.0 (+0.6)
易用性 Cloudbeds 4.6 vs 3.9 (+0.7)
客户支持 Cloudbeds 4.4 vs 4.0 (+0.4)
性价比 Cloudbeds 4.3 vs 3.6 (+0.7)
入职培训 Cloudbeds 4.5 vs 3.6 (+0.8)

关于 Cloudbeds PMS 与 Infor HMS 的常见问题

Cloudbeds PMS 能否替代 Infor HMS?

这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 Infor HMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Infor HMS 提供 113 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 3.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Cloudbeds PMS 或 Infor HMS 是否提供免费方案?

Cloudbeds PMS:否。Infor HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Cloudbeds PMS 和 Infor HMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Infor 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息