The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 48 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Infor 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Kross Booking 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 48 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 47 | 1 |
在分析了 48 条经验证的评价后,Infor 用户最看重其 易于使用, 报告, 一体化,而 Kross Booking 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Kross Booking |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
报告
▾
|
|
|
+
一体化
▾
|
|
|
+
家政模块
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持
▾
|
|
|
−
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
−
更新问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Kross Booking |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #44 8 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #25 24 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #19 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #24 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Kross Booking |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #28 24 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #23 26 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #29 8 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #31 6 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Kross Booking |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 20 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #24 17 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #28 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Infor HMS and Kross Booking hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, size, and operational complexity. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but their core strengths and target markets differ significantly. Infor HMS, with its extensive feature set and regional presence, is tailored for larger hotels seeking deep customization, while Kross Booking appeals to vacation rentals and smaller properties valuing simplicity and ease of use.
Given the data, Infor HMS has more recent reviews and a much larger user base, indicating a more active and tested platform. Are you prioritizing a feature-rich, scalable PMS or a straightforward, user-friendly system?
This comparison highlights key differences in scope, coverage, and suitability for different hotel types. Infor HMS offers a broad, customizable platform with modules for revenue management, guest CRM, and housekeeping, making it ideal for mid to large-scale hotels seeking comprehensive control. Conversely, Kross Booking focuses primarily on vacation rentals, with an emphasis on booking management, guest communications, and integrated features like online check-in, suited for smaller operations or rental agencies.
Infor HMS has been in the market since 1999, with a global presence across 13 countries and over 46 reviews, many recent, showing ongoing development and support. Kross Booking, with only one review and limited regional data, appears more niche and less proven at scale. Do you need a flexible, enterprise-grade PMS or a simplified solution for vacation properties?
If your hotel requires a full-featured, multi-property management system with extensive integrations, custom reports, and regional support, Infor HMS is your best bet. It’s well-suited for independent hotels, boutique properties, and branded chains looking for automation, revenue management, and scalable modules.
If your focus is on vacation rentals, villas, or small properties prioritizing ease of use, quick onboarding, and online guest management, Kross Booking aligns better with those needs. Its limited but growing feature set and recent user experience make it ideal for properties that value simplicity and rapid deployment.
For large or complex properties, Infor’s broader reach and feature depth outweigh Kross Booking’s minimal implementation footprint. Conversely, smaller or niche vacation properties benefit from Kross Booking’s straightforward approach.
Infor HMS scores slightly lower in ease of use (3.88/5) compared to Kross Booking (4/5), reflecting its extensive feature set and more complex interface. Infor’s onboarding receives a 3.64/5, with some users noting issues during updates and bugs, though support is rated highly at 4.04/5. Users say Infor is “easy to navigate once you get the format down,” but its depth can overwhelm some teams.
Kross Booking’s higher ease of use rating and support score of 5/5, coupled with a 4/5 onboarding rating, suggest it’s more intuitive for new users. Its limited feature set simplifies daily operations, reducing training time.
Edge: Kross Booking.
Infor HMS offers 20 features exclusive to its platform, including modules for housekeeping, guest CRM, multi-lingual support, payment processing, revenue management, automated night audits, and more. Its features are designed for large properties needing detailed operational control.
Kross Booking, with no unique features listed, appears to provide a core set focused on booking management, guest communication, and online check-in. It’s less feature-rich but more streamlined.
The depth and variety of Infor’s features give it an edge for complex hotel operations. For properties needing extensive customization and operational modules, Infor wins; for simpler needs, Kross Booking’s straightforward approach may suffice.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS’s support scores 4.04/5 with numerous reviews praising responsiveness and professionalism. Hoteliers mention “support team is very helpful and quick to resolve issues,” which is critical during system disruptions. However, some users report bugs during updates, impacting their experience.
Kross Booking’s support scores a perfect 5/5, with reviews highlighting “quick training and support” and a more attentive service experience. Given the limited review count, this may reflect a smaller support team but a very positive user interaction.
Edge: Kross Booking.
Infor HMS boasts 113 verified integration partners, including major booking platforms like Booking.com, Expedia, HRS, and advanced revenue systems like Fairmas. This extensive network enables seamless operations across various operational and financial systems.
Kross Booking, with zero verified integrations, appears to be more self-contained, limiting its ability to connect with external systems at this time.
For hotels requiring extensive third-party integrations, Infor’s ecosystem provides a significant advantage. For smaller operations or those not dependent on integrations, Kross Booking’s simplicity might suffice.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS has an overall rating of 4.04/5 based on 46 reviews, with many recent reviews (none in the last 6 months). Hotels in the boutique segment rate it highly at 4.18/5, and independent hotels at 2.5/5, indicating varied experiences based on property type.
Kross Booking, with only one review, scores poorly at 0/5, making it impossible to draw broad conclusions. Given the recent review absence, Infor’s more extensive feedback suggests a more reliable user perception.
Thus, Infor HMS is rated higher overall, especially for larger or more complex hotels.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Both products do not publicly list pricing details, with no indication of freemium, flat monthly, or per-room charges. This suggests custom pricing based on hotel size, configuration, and feature requirements. Expect to contact vendors for quotes.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Infor HMS offers a comprehensive, flexible platform suited for mid to large hotels wanting detailed control, revenue management, and extensive integrations. Its larger review base and regional support make it a more mature solution, especially for operations demanding customization.
Kross Booking appeals to smaller, vacation rental-focused properties that prioritize ease of use, online management, and quick deployment. Its support ratings are higher, but its limited features and integrations restrict its suitability for larger or more complex hotel operations.
Choose Infor HMS if your hotel needs extensive modules, regional support, and scalable management tools. Opt for Kross Booking if your primary goal is a straightforward, user-friendly platform for vacation rentals or small hotels.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Kross Booking |
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Infor HMS 和 Kross Booking 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Kross Booking |
|---|---|---|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 8 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Infor HMS 和 Kross Booking 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Infor HMS 提供 113 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Kross Booking 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Kross Booking 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.0/5 对比 3.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Infor HMS:否。Kross Booking:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Infor 的 HT Score 为 22,Kross Booking 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问