The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #44 8 条评价 | #68 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #25 24 条评价 | #50 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #19 9 条评价 | #29 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #24 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #28 24 条评价 | #52 3 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #23 26 条评价 | #49 3 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #29 8 条评价 | #58 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #31 6 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 20 条评价 | #66 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #24 17 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #28 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #9 6 条评价 |
Choosing between Infor HMS and Kwentra boils down to your hotel’s specific needs, budget, and operational priorities. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they do so with different strengths: Infor offers a broader integration network and more established presence, while Kwentra provides a highly rated, user-friendly platform with a smaller but passionate user base. Your team must decide whether you prioritize advanced customization and extensive integrations or ease of use and high guest satisfaction ratings.
Both products serve the hotel industry well, but their approaches differ significantly. Infor HMS is more feature-rich and globally recognized, whereas Kwentra is praised for its simplicity and modern cloud architecture. Which aligns better with your hotel’s current tech maturity and growth trajectory?
Infor HMS primarily targets hotels that need deep customization, extensive integrations, and a scalable platform capable of handling complex operations. It’s ideal if your hotel requires features like detailed reporting, flexible rate management, and a broad partner network, especially in regions like North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.
Kwentra, on the other hand, is better suited for hotels seeking ease of implementation, straightforward usability, and high guest satisfaction scores. Its high ratings in ease of use (4.83/5 vs. Infor's 3.88/5) and customer support (4.83/5 vs. 4.04/5) make it attractive for smaller hotels or properties with limited IT staff. Do you prioritize customization and extensive integration, or do you prefer an intuitive system with quick onboarding?
If your hotel needs a highly flexible, customizable PMS with comprehensive integrations and robust reporting, Infor HMS is the clear choice. It’s especially suitable for large, complex properties or hotel groups looking to automate workflows and streamline revenue management.
Conversely, if your property values simplicity, rapid deployment, and excellent support, Kwentra should be your pick. Its high user ratings (5/5 across multiple reviews) and lower complexity make it perfect for boutique hotels, resorts, or hotels entering digital transformation without extensive IT infrastructure.
In summary:
Kwentra outshines Infor HMS significantly in user-friendliness, rated 4.83/5 versus Infor’s 3.88/5. Its onboarding process is also rated higher at 4.75/5 compared to Infor’s 3.64/5, indicating a smoother transition for your team.
Review quotes reinforce this: Kwentra users highlight how helpful and quick the support team is, with many praising the platform’s intuitive interface and minimal training requirements. Infor HMS, while generally easy to navigate, receives some criticism for its less modern UI and occasional glitches during updates.
Edge: Kwentra.
Kwentra offers 28 features exclusive to its platform, including Channel Manager, Booking Engine, EPoS, and integrated ID & Passport Scanner. Its feature set focuses heavily on operational automation, real-time reporting, and digital check-in options, supporting a modern guest experience.
Infor HMS features one unique capability—guest profiles—and shares 19 common features with Kwentra, such as housekeeping and basic reporting. However, it lacks some of Kwentra’s advanced guest engagement tools like online check-in, digital registration, and automated reminders.
Edge: Kwentra.
Kwentra’s customer support and onboarding ratings both stand at 4.83/5, with reviews emphasizing their quick response times and helpfulness. Many users describe the team as “always in a quick response” and “very helpful,” making onboarding and troubleshooting straightforward.
Infor HMS’s support, rated at 4.04/5, is generally regarded as responsive but sometimes less prompt, with reviews mentioning delays during software updates and glitches. While support is praised, some users note that resolving issues can take longer compared to Kwentra’s service.
Edge: Kwentra.
Infor HMS boasts over 113 verified partners, including major players like SiteMinder, Adyen, and Onity, offering extensive connectivity with booking engines, payment systems, and revenue management tools. Its broad partner network makes it suitable for larger hotels or groups needing comprehensive integration options.
Kwentra has 18 verified partners, including Hotel Data Cloud, Expedia, and Yanolja, with fewer options but enough for most mid-sized properties. Shared integrations with Infor include SiteMinder and Adyen, but Infor’s extensive network gives it an advantage for hotels relying on multiple third-party vendors.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Kwentra holds a perfect 5/5 rating from six reviews, with all reviewers praising its ease of use, helpful support, and comprehensive features. Its recent reviews reinforce high satisfaction, especially among resorts and smaller properties.
Infor HMS has a 4.04/5 rating based on 46 reviews, with some users citing issues with system glitches and updates, though many appreciate its customization and integration capabilities. Larger hotel chains and properties with complex needs tend to rate it more favorably.
Edge: Kwentra.
Pricing details for Infor HMS are not publicly listed; it likely follows a custom quote model based on hotel size and features. Implementation fees and trial options are not typically available, making initial investment conversations necessary.
Kwentra’s pricing is also undisclosed publicly, but its subscription-based model generally aligns with smaller, scalable packages without hidden fees. Both systems lack free tiers or freemium options, so cost comparisons require direct vendor contact.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Infor HMS delivers a broad, scalable property management platform suited for large, multi-property hotels needing customization and extensive integrations. Its strengths are in automating operations, managing revenue, and connecting with numerous partners, making it ideal for established hotel groups or properties with complex workflows.
Kwentra offers a streamlined, user-friendly system that excels in ease of use, rapid onboarding, and guest engagement features. Its high satisfaction ratings and simple setup make it perfect for boutique hotels, resorts, or properties entering digital transformation without wanting to manage complex integrations.
When to choose Infor HMS:
When to choose Kwentra:
In conclusion, if your hotel values a feature-rich platform with a broad partner network and can handle a more complex system, Infor HMS is the better choice. If ease of use, high customer support, and high reviews matter most, Kwentra is the clear winner.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Infor HMS 和 kwentra 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Infor HMS 提供 113 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 kwentra 提供 18 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。kwentra 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 3.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Infor HMS:否。kwentra:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Infor 的 HT Score 为 22,Kwentra 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问