Infor HMS vs. Previo: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 47 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 47 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Infor 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Guest CRM.

PREVIO 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Infor HMS 与 Previo 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 47 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
22
0
推荐可能性
74%
0%
易用性
3.9/5
0.0/5
客户支持
4.1/5
0.0/5
性价比
3.6/5
0.0/5
起始价格 Contact sales Contact sales
经验证的评价 47 0

Infor HMS 与 Previo 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 47 条经验证的评价后,Infor 用户最看重其 易于使用, 报告, 一体化,而 PREVIO 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Infor Infor PREVIO PREVIO
优点
+ 易于使用
+ 报告
+ 一体化
+ 家政模块
缺点
支持
易于使用
更新问题

Infor 对比 PREVIO:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Infor Infor PREVIO PREVIO
小型(10-24 间客房) #44 8 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #25 24 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #19 9 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #24 2 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Infor Infor PREVIO PREVIO
精品酒店 #28 24 条评价
豪华酒店 #23 26 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #29 8 条评价
长住酒店 #31 6 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Infor Infor PREVIO PREVIO
北美 #22 20 条评价
欧洲 #24 17 条评价
亚太 #28 1 条评价

The Decision

Choosing a property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel's operational efficiency and guest experience. Both Infor HMS and Previo aim to modernize your management processes, but they do so with different strengths. Infor has a long-standing presence, a broad feature set, and extensive global reach, whereas Previo offers an all-in-one cloud solution with a focus on the Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) region. Your choice depends on your hotel’s size, location, and specific needs.

Both products aim to streamline hotel operations, but Infor HMS boasts a more established market presence and a larger user base. Previo, though less widespread, markets itself as a comprehensive platform for hotels seeking centralized management in a regional context. Which product aligns better with your priorities: global scalability or regional specialization?

Is Infor HMS or Previo Better for Hotels?

Infor HMS primarily targets mid-sized to large hotels looking for a flexible, scalable PMS with robust integrations and customizations. It offers a broad feature set including revenue management, automated night audits, and guest CRM, designed to support complex operations. However, some users report frequent server outages and bugs following updates, which can hinder daily operations.

Previo, by contrast, is positioned as an all-in-one cloud system with integrated modules such as booking engine, channel manager, and housekeeping, tailored for hotels in the CEE region. It lacks the extensive review footprint of Infor but emphasizes ease of central management and automation within its regional market. If your hotel needs a highly customizable, globally supported system, Infor is likely the better choice. If regional management and integrated tools are your priority, Previo might serve you well.

The key difference: Infor’s strength lies in its broad, flexible suite and international support, while Previo emphasizes regional focus and integrated features for streamlined management. Which approach aligns with your hotel’s growth plans and operational scope?

Infor HMS vs Previo: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel operates in multiple regions or has complex operational needs, go with Infor HMS. Its extensive integration network (over 113 verified partners), customizable reporting, and scalability make it suitable for large or multi-property groups. It’s especially valuable if your team prioritizes automation, revenue management, or detailed guest profiling.

If your hotel is primarily based in the CEE region and seeks an all-in-one platform with built-in booking, channel management, and guest engagement tools, Previo is the better fit. Its native modules reduce third-party dependencies, and its straightforward cloud-based approach simplifies daily management. It’s ideal for hotels seeking regional efficiency and a unified system without heavy customization needs.

In short, choose Infor if your hotel leans toward complex, multi-property operations with a global footprint. Opt for Previo if your focus is on regional management and integrated, easy-to-use tools.

Is Infor HMS or Previo Easier to Use?

Infor HMS has a moderate ease-of-use rating of 3.88/5 and is generally considered navigable once familiar with its format. Users mention that the system is "easy to navigate" after onboarding, and its mobile app adds operational flexibility. However, some report that the interface isn't particularly attractive, and frequent updates can cause disruptions.

Previo’s ease of use isn’t explicitly rated but is implied to be straightforward, especially because it offers an all-in-one platform with integrated modules. Its cloud-based design simplifies onboarding, especially for hotels in the CEE region, and the integrated nature reduces the learning curve associated with multiple systems.

Edge: Infor HMS, due to its higher review volume and more detailed usability feedback.

Which Has Better Features: Infor HMS or Previo?

Infor offers 10 shared features with Previo but shines with 10 unique capabilities like guest profiles, cloud support, revenue management, automated night audits, and payment processing. These functionalities support complex revenue strategies and operational automation suited for larger hotels.

Previo, however, provides 21 features, including a native booking engine, channel manager, task management, online check-in/out, integrated ID scanner, GDPR compliance, and PCI support. Its comprehensive module set aims to centralize all hotel management tasks with minimal third-party integrations needed.

Edge: Previo, with more features tailored to operational centralization and automation.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Infor HMS or Previo?

Infor’s support scores a solid 4.04/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and professionalism. Hoteliers highlight that support staff are "kind," "helpful," and quick to respond, which is crucial during system issues or upgrades.

Previo’s support data isn’t detailed, but given its smaller user base and regional focus, support may be less extensive. However, in its target markets, support is often localized and responsive, especially within the CEE region.

Edge: Infor HMS, due to its higher support rating and extensive review history.

Which Has More Integrations: Infor HMS or Previo?

Infor boasts 113 verified partner integrations, including major industry names like Booking.com, Expedia, and Onity. These integrations support automation and reduce manual work, especially beneficial for larger or multi-channel hotels.

Previo has only 7 verified partners, with shared integrations including some notable hospitality providers like HQ Revenue and profit management tools. Its smaller ecosystem limits potential automation but simplifies integration management.

Edge: Infor HMS, thanks to its extensive partner network.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Infor HMS or Previo?

Infor’s overall rating of 4.04/5 comes from 46 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its scalability, customization, and support. Hotels in the independent and boutique segments rate it 4.18/5 and 4.5/5 respectively, indicating strong satisfaction among diverse property types.

Previo lacks recent review data and an overall rating, making it difficult to gauge user sentiment. Its regional focus might mean satisfaction varies based on local support and feature relevance.

Edge: Infor HMS, due to higher review volume and recent positive feedback.

How Much Do Infor HMS and Previo Cost?

Both products do not publicly disclose detailed pricing, as they typically tailor quotes based on hotel size and needs. Infor HMS’s pricing model is not transparent, but implementation fees and per-room charges are common in large-scale systems.

Previo similarly offers no fixed pricing info, positioning itself as a regional solution likely priced competitively for smaller to mid-sized hotels in CEE. Expect quotes based on features and hotel size rather than flat rates.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Infor HMS?

  • Hotels that operate across multiple regions or countries.
  • Larger properties or portfolios needing extensive customization and integrations.
  • Hotels prioritizing revenue management, automation, and detailed reporting.
  • Teams comfortable with technical onboarding and ongoing support.
  • Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, lightweight system or has a very limited budget.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Previo?

  • Hotels primarily located in the CEE region seeking an all-in-one platform.
  • Properties that prefer centralized management with built-in booking engine and channel management.
  • Hotels aiming for operational automation and guest engagement tools without extensive customization.
  • Teams with limited IT support or looking for straightforward onboarding.
  • Not ideal if your hotel needs global support, complex revenue strategies, or extensive integrations outside of its current ecosystem.

Infor HMS vs Previo: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Infor HMS is a comprehensive, scalable PMS suited for hotels with complex needs and international operations. Its extensive integration network, customization options, and broad feature set make it ideal for larger, multi-property hotels or chains.

Previo offers a regional, all-in-one cloud solution that simplifies hotel management, particularly in the CEE region. Its integrated modules are perfect for hotels seeking a unified system with automation and minimal third-party dependencies.

Choose Infor if your hotel requires extensive customization, global support, and advanced revenue management. Opt for Previo if regional management, ease of use, and integrated tools are your priorities.

In conclusion, Infor’s larger review footprint and feature breadth make it the more proven choice for most hotels seeking a flexible, scalable PMS. Previo’s targeted regional focus and comprehensive modules appeal to hotels looking for an all-in-one solution within the CEE market.

Final recommendation: For most global or larger hotels, Infor HMS is the better option. For hotels in Central and Eastern Europe prioritizing simplicity and integrated modules, Previo is worth considering.

Infor HMS 和 Previo 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Infor Infor PREVIO PREVIO

Infor HMS 有哪些 Previo 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Infor HMS 和 Previo 共享 10 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Infor Infor PREVIO PREVIO
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
原生电子邮件营销
在前提
在线 24/7 支持
基于云
客人资料
客户关系管理
礼品卡
移动应用
访客通信(短信)
预订引擎
频道管理员

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 19 项功能存在差异。

Infor 对比 PREVIO:总结

Infor
Infor
3.7/5 来自 47 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

易于使用 60% 正面

Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。

报告 67% 正面

报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。

一体化 100% 正面

Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

支持 43% 负面

Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。

易于使用 40% 负面

Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。

独特功能

在线 24/7 支持 客人资料 基于云 客户关系管理 移动应用
3.9/5 易用性 4.0/5 客户支持 113 个集成
查看资料
PREVIO
PREVIO
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价

独特功能

交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) 访客通信(短信) 原生电子邮件营销 礼品卡 频道管理员
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 7 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Infor 4.0 vs 0.0 (+4)
易用性 Infor 3.9 vs 0.0 (+3.9)
客户支持 Infor 4.0 vs 0.0 (+4)
性价比 Infor 3.6 vs 0.0 (+3.6)
入职培训 Infor 3.6 vs 0.0 (+3.6)

关于 Infor HMS 与 Previo 的常见问题

Infor HMS 能否替代 Previo?

这取决于您的需求。Infor HMS 和 Previo 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Infor HMS 提供 113 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Previo 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Infor HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 3.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Infor HMS 或 Previo 是否提供免费方案?

Infor HMS:否。Previo:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Infor HMS 和 Previo?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Infor 的 HT Score 为 22,PREVIO 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息