The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 47 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Infor 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Rezovation 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 47 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 47 | 0 |
在分析了 47 条经验证的评价后,Infor 用户最看重其 易于使用, 报告, 一体化,而 Rezovation 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
报告
▾
|
|
|
+
一体化
▾
|
|
|
+
家政模块
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持
▾
|
|
|
−
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
−
更新问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #44 8 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #25 24 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #19 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #24 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #28 24 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #23 26 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #29 8 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #31 6 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 20 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #24 17 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #28 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for streamlining your operations and enhancing guest experiences. Infor HMS by Infor and Rezovation both aim to serve the hotel industry, but they differ significantly in scope, user feedback, and regional presence. While Rezovation emphasizes online reservations and marketing for small hotels, B&Bs, and inns, Infor offers a broader, enterprise-level solution with extensive features. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s size and needs?
Both products target different segments and operational priorities. Infor HMS is a comprehensive, cloud-based PMS with advanced modules like housekeeping, revenue management, and multi-lingual support, boasting a higher review count (46) and recent feedback. Rezovation, on the other hand, specializes in online reservations and marketing for smaller properties, but has no recent reviews to gauge current user satisfaction. Given the data, Infor’s larger presence and recent feedback suggest a more reliable, mature offering.
While Rezovation is tailored for boutique hotels and B&Bs looking for online booking solutions, Infor’s extensive feature set appeals to mid-sized and larger hotels aiming for operational integration. Do your hotel’s needs lean more toward online reservations and marketing or comprehensive property management? This distinction helps clarify which platform might serve you better.
If your hotel needs a scalable, multi-functional PMS capable of handling complex operations, go with Infor HMS. Its broad feature set—like guest profiles, revenue management, and automated night audits—makes it ideal for hotels seeking deep operational control.
If your focus is primarily on online reservations, website integration, and internet marketing for a small property, Rezovation’s suite of tools could suffice, especially if your staff prefers a straightforward, reservation-driven approach. However, the lack of recent reviews and limited regional presence suggest Rezovation might not be suitable for hotels seeking long-term, enterprise-grade support.
For larger hotels or those planning growth, Infor’s proven track record and extensive integrations make it the safer choice. Conversely, boutique operators with limited needs and a focus on reservations could consider Rezovation, but should be cautious about the lack of recent customer feedback.
Infor HMS scores a 3.88 out of 5 for ease of use, with users highlighting its intuitive navigation once familiar, but citing occasional usability frustrations, especially during updates. The onboarding process is rated at 3.64, with support often praised for responsiveness, though some find training materials could improve.
Rezovation has no recent reviews to evaluate, which makes assessing its user-friendliness difficult. Historically, Rezovation’s focus on small properties and online reservations suggests a simpler interface, but without current data, it's impossible to definitively compare ease of use.
Edge: Infor HMS, due to its higher review count, recent feedback, and known usability strengths.
Infor HMS offers 20 unique features, including a housekeeping module, guest CRM, centralized role management, revenue modules, and automated night audits, making it a feature-rich system for complex hotel operations. Rezovation, primarily designed for online reservations and marketing, does not list additional features beyond its booking engine and website design.
While Rezovation excels in online reservations, it lacks the extensive operational modules found in Infor HMS. For hotels needing a full PMS with advanced operational features, Infor clearly leads.
Edge: Infor HMS, with a broader set of features tailored to managing large and complex properties.
Infor HMS's support scores a 4.04 out of 5, with reviews emphasizing promptness and professionalism, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. Users appreciate the quick, helpful responses, crucial for resolving technical issues efficiently.
Rezovation has no recent reviews available, making it impossible to accurately gauge current support quality. Historically, small vendors may vary in support responsiveness, but the lack of recent data doesn’t inspire confidence.
Edge: Infor HMS, given its higher support rating and recent positive reviews.
Infor HMS boasts 113 verified integration partners, including major industry players like Booking.com, Expedia, and Trevo. These integrations facilitate smooth data flow across booking, revenue, and operational systems, reducing manual work.
Rezovation does not list verified partners or integrations, focusing mainly on its proprietary reservation system and website design. For hotels requiring extensive third-party integrations, Infor’s ecosystem provides a significant advantage.
Edge: Infor HMS, with its extensive, verified partner network.
Infor HMS has a total review count of 46, with an overall rating of 4.04/5. While recent reviews are sparse, the positive feedback underscores its value for hotels of various sizes. Guests in the luxury, boutique, and city-center segments rate it favorably, with some calling it "very customizable" and "efficient."
Rezovation has no recent reviews, so no recent guest or hotelier ratings are available. Given the data, Infor HMS is the more trusted, consistently rated choice among hoteliers.
Edge: Infor HMS, supported by recent, high-quality reviews.
Pricing details for Infor HMS are not publicly available, as it typically involves a custom quote based on hotel size and requirements. Rezovation also does not list specific prices, but historically targets small to mid-sized properties with transparent online pricing.
Without concrete figures, your best bet is to contact vendors directly for quotes. Typically, Infor's enterprise solutions tend to be more costly than Rezovation’s reservation-focused offerings, reflecting their scope.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Infor HMS provides a robust, feature-rich PMS suitable for hotels requiring extensive operational control, scalability, and integrations. Its higher review count and recent positive feedback make it a dependable choice for mid-sized and larger properties.
Rezovation excels in online reservations and marketing for small properties, but the absence of recent reviews and limited features suggest it’s best suited for very small hotels or inns prioritizing internet visibility over comprehensive management.
If your hotel needs a full PMS capable of managing complex operations, Infor HMS is the clear winner. For small properties focused on online reservations, Rezovation may suffice, but proceed with caution given limited recent data.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Infor HMS 和 Rezovation 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 8 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Infor HMS 和 Rezovation 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Infor HMS 提供 113 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Rezovation 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Infor HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 3.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Infor HMS:否。Rezovation:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Infor 的 HT Score 为 22,Rezovation 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问