The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 47 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Infor 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Travel Tripper 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 47 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 47 | 0 |
在分析了 47 条经验证的评价后,Infor 用户最看重其 易于使用, 报告, 一体化,而 Travel Tripper 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
报告
▾
|
|
|
+
一体化
▾
|
|
|
+
家政模块
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持
▾
|
|
|
−
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
−
更新问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #44 8 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #25 24 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #19 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #24 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #28 24 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #23 26 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #29 8 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #31 6 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 20 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #24 17 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #28 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Infor HMS and Travel Tripper involves evaluating not just features but also support, usability, and regional presence. Infor HMS is a comprehensive property management system (PMS) with a strong track record in hospitality, while Travel Tripper is primarily a distribution and booking platform. Both aim to improve operational efficiency, but they serve different core functions. Your choice hinges on whether you need an all-in-one PMS or a dedicated booking and revenue platform.
Most hoteliers considering these two solutions are looking for reliability, ease of use, and strong support. Infor's extensive feature set and established global presence make it a more proven choice, especially given the recent reviews and its high overall rating. Travel Tripper, despite lacking recent reviews, is more niche-focused, emphasizing booking and distribution. So, which better aligns with your hotel's needs?
Infor HMS addresses core hotel operations with a full PMS designed to streamline guest management, housekeeping, revenue, and reporting. It’s built for hotels seeking an integrated system that handles reservations, billing, and guest profiles in one platform. Travel Tripper, on the other hand, focuses on distribution, channel management, and increasing direct bookings, making it ideal for hotels aiming to optimize revenue from their website and third-party channels.
While Infor offers a broad set of features—including a housekeeping module, guest CRM, multi-currency support, and automated night audits—Travel Tripper zeroes in on channel distribution, booking engine capabilities, and revenue optimization tools. If your hotel needs an all-encompassing PMS, Infor is the clear choice; if your goal is to boost direct bookings and manage distribution channels more effectively, Travel Tripper might be more suitable.
However, Infor’s more recent reviews, higher overall ratings, and larger review base give it a distinct advantage. Are you looking for a complete operational backbone or a specialized distribution solution?
If your hotel needs a robust property management system with extensive integrations, automation, and operational modules, go with Infor HMS. It’s suited for hotels that prioritize streamlined guest management, housekeeping, revenue tracking, and detailed reporting—especially if you operate in regions like North America, Europe, or Asia Pacific, where its market presence is strong.
Conversely, if your hotel is focused on increasing direct bookings, reducing distribution costs, and managing multiple channels efficiently, Travel Tripper is the better pick. It’s ideal for hotels that want to optimize revenue through a central reservation system and distribution tools, especially if they are smaller properties or resorts that want to maximize online visibility.
Given its 46 recent reviews and a 4.04/5 overall rating, Infor’s reputation is stronger. If you value a proven, feature-rich platform with regional reach, Infor wins. But if your primary goal is to boost direct booking revenue, consider Travel Tripper.
Infor HMS has a user-friendly interface, rated 3.88 out of 5, with many users describing it as "easy to navigate" once familiar with its structure. Its onboarding process is rated 3.64 out of 5, with support team responsiveness praised for guiding new users effectively. However, some reviews note that the UI could be more aesthetically pleasing and intuitive, and updates occasionally introduce bugs that hinder usability.
Travel Tripper, lacking recent reviews, makes it difficult to assess ease of use. Its interface is described as straightforward and designed for quick adoption, especially for distribution and booking tasks, but no detailed usability ratings or user feedback are available.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS offers approximately 20 unique features not found in Travel Tripper, including a housekeeping module, online support, guest profiles, direct billing, a revenue management module, and automated night audits. These features support comprehensive hotel operations, from guest management to financial reporting.
Travel Tripper’s core strengths lie in booking, distribution, and revenue maximization tools, but it lacks the extensive operational modules found in Infor. With no unique features listed outside of distribution solutions, Infor’s broader feature set clearly provides more value for full-property management.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS's support scores 4.04 out of 5, with many reviews highlighting their responsiveness and professionalism. Support representatives are praised for their speed and helpful guidance, which is crucial when dealing with system disruptions or updates. Onboarding support is rated at 3.64, with some room for improvement in training materials.
Travel Tripper, lacking recent review data, makes it difficult to assess support quality. No specific ratings or comments are available, but given its smaller size, it may not offer the same level of dedicated support as Infor.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS integrates with 113 verified partners, including major booking channels like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS, as well as revenue and payment solutions. These integrations help hotels operate smoothly in a complex ecosystem of third-party services.
Travel Tripper, with no verified integrations listed, appears to have a limited or less documented integration network. Its focus remains on distribution and booking, but it does not seem to offer the same breadth of connectivity.
Edge: Infor HMS.
With 46 recent reviews and a 4.04/5 overall rating, Infor HMS is rated favorably by hoteliers across segments like boutique, city center, and independent hotels. The most common praise centers on its feature set, support, and operational efficiency.
Travel Tripper has no recent reviews or rating data, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Its reputation is less established, especially compared to Infor’s more extensive review base.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing information for Infor HMS is not publicly available, but it is typically a customizable, enterprise-level solution with potential implementation fees. Travel Tripper also does not list specific prices, but as a platform focusing on distribution and booking, it’s likely based on a subscription model tailored to property size and needs.
Without transparent pricing, your best approach is to request quotes based on your property’s specifics—however, Infor’s more comprehensive feature set often entails a higher investment.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with limited operational complexity, or solely focused on distribution and bookings.
Not ideal if your hotel needs full property management functionalities or regional support.
Infor HMS is a full-featured PMS suited for hotels that want a comprehensive operational system with robust integrations and scalability. It supports complex property needs with modules for housekeeping, revenue management, and guest profiles, making it ideal for mid-sized and large hotels.
Travel Tripper is a distribution-focused platform designed to increase direct bookings and streamline channel management. It’s better suited for properties aiming to boost online visibility and revenue without investing in a full PMS.
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich PMS with global reach, Infor is the clear choice. For hotels primarily targeting revenue growth through distribution, Travel Tripper could be a more focused solution.
Infor HMS stands out as the more complete, review-backed solution, with a broad feature set, extensive integrations, and high support ratings. Its recent reviews emphasize its stability and operational capabilities, making it suitable for a wide range of hotel types.
Travel Tripper, despite lacking recent review data, remains a strong option if your focus is on channel management and direct bookings. However, for most hotels seeking an established, reliable PMS, Infor HMS provides the more convincing value.
In conclusion, if your hotel requires a full-scale property management system with proven support and extensive features, Infor HMS is the recommended choice. If your primary goal is to maximize direct online revenue through distribution channels, consider Travel Tripper.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Infor HMS 和 Travel Tripper 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 8 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Infor HMS 和 Travel Tripper 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Infor HMS 提供 113 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Travel Tripper 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Infor HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 3.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Infor HMS:否。Travel Tripper:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Infor 的 HT Score 为 22,Travel Tripper 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问