The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #44 8 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #25 24 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #19 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #24 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #28 24 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #23 26 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #29 8 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #31 6 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 20 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #24 17 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #28 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Infor HMS and Uplisting hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and the scale of your property management. Infor HMS offers a robust, enterprise-level solution with extensive features and a strong regional presence, making it suitable for larger, varied hotels. Uplisting, on the other hand, is tailored for short-term rental operators seeking streamlined management across multiple listings, but it lacks recent reviews and broader integrations. Which product aligns better with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans?
Infor HMS, with more than 46 recent reviews and a 4.04/5 overall rating, is the clearer choice for hoteliers seeking a comprehensive property management system. Its broad feature set, strong regional presence, and high customer satisfaction make it a more proven solution. Uplisting, despite its niche appeal and automation capabilities, has no recent reviews and limited integration options, making it a less reliable choice for your hotel right now.
Infor HMS is a full-scale property management system built to handle diverse hotel operations, from luxury resorts to boutique hotels, with a focus on automation, integrations, and extensive modules like revenue management and housekeeping. Uplisting caters mainly to short-term rental hosts managing multiple listings across platforms, emphasizing guest communication automation and calendar synchronization.
While Infor HMS boasts 113 verified integrations—including major booking channels and revenue tools—Uplisting only integrates with two verified partners and shares just one with Infor. The breadth of Infor’s regional presence (covering Asia Pacific, North America, Europe, and the Middle East) underscores its suitability for hotels operating across multiple markets, whereas Uplisting’s limited geographical footprint suggests a narrower application scope.
Both products aim to streamline operations, but Infor’s focus extends beyond simple booking management to include detailed reporting, revenue tracking, multi-currency support, and on-premise or cloud deployment. Uplisting focuses on automating guest communication, calendar sync, and property-level tasks, but it may lack the depth needed for large or complex properties.
Given the scope and scale of your hotel, Infor HMS addresses a broader set of needs and has a proven track record. Uplisting may be appealing for small rental operations but is less suited for full-scale hotels. Are you looking for an all-in-one solution with enterprise capabilities or a streamlined platform for short-term rentals?
Edge: Infor HMS
If your hotel needs a comprehensive property management system with extensive modules, Infor HMS is your best fit. Its rich feature set includes housekeeping, guest profiles, central management, multi-lingual support, payment processing, revenue management, and automated night audits—all proven to improve operational flow. The system's 46 reviews in the last six months, with a 4.04/5 rating, show sustained recent satisfaction.
Uplisting is better suited for small-scale rental portfolios, especially if automation of guest communications, calendar synchronization, and multi-channel management are your priorities. However, its lack of recent reviews and limited integrations (only two verified partners) mean it’s less validated for larger or more complex hotel environments.
In summary, if your hotel is looking for a scalable, feature-rich PMS with regional support and a proven track record, Infor HMS is the clear choice. If your operation is primarily short-term rentals with minimal complexity, Uplisting may suffice, but its current lack of recent feedback is a concern.
Edge: Infor HMS
Infor HMS scores 3.88/5 for ease of use, based on user feedback that describes navigation as generally straightforward once familiar with its format, though some find the interface less aesthetically appealing. The onboarding process earns a 3.64/5, with users noting that support during setup is helpful but could be more comprehensive. Support staff are praised for responsiveness and professionalism, which eases staff adoption.
Uplisting has no recent reviews or detailed ratings, so assessing its user-friendliness is difficult. Its niche focus on short-term rentals suggests a simpler platform, but without recent user feedback, its ease of use remains unverified.
Given Infor’s established presence and positive support ratings, it offers a more reliable onboarding and user experience. Unless Uplisting has significantly improved or has a straightforward interface, edge goes to Infor HMS for usability.
Edge: Infor HMS
Infor HMS offers 20 unique features, including a housekeeping module, online support, guest profiles, centralized user management, multi-lingual interface, multi-currency support, payment processing, revenue management, and automated night audits. These features collectively support large, complex hotel operations.
Uplisting currently has no unique features listed, focusing primarily on automation of guest communication, calendar sync, and property management for short-term rentals. Its narrow feature set limits its applicability for full-service hotels.
With a broader and more detailed feature offering, Infor HMS clearly surpasses Uplisting. If comprehensive management tools are important, Infor is the better choice.
Edge: Infor HMS
Infor HMS’s support scores 4.04/5, with many reviews highlighting prompt, professional assistance. Users often mention that the support team guides them effectively through issues, which is crucial given the system's complexity. Support is available 24/7, ensuring minimal downtime and quick resolution.
Uplisting has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current support quality. Its limited user base and lack of recent feedback suggest support quality is unverified and potentially weaker.
For reliable, accessible support, Infor HMS takes the lead. Hotel teams planning for ongoing assistance should favor Infor.
Edge: Infor HMS
Infor HMS integrates with 113 verified partners, including major booking channels, revenue systems, and payment processors. Shared integrations include Duve, while Infor’s unique partners encompass Priority Software, Trevo, HQ Revenue, and others—indicating a mature, versatile ecosystem.
Uplisting only connects to two verified partners, with PriceLabs being the sole listed integration. Its limited integration scope reduces flexibility for hotels needing to connect with multiple operational tools.
The extensive integration network of Infor HMS makes it a more adaptable choice for hotels seeking a connected, automated environment. Uplisting’s limited integrations restrict its utility in complex hotel settings.
Edge: Infor HMS
Infor HMS has received 46 reviews in the last six months, with an overall rating of 4.04/5 and a high likelihood to recommend at 74%. Reviewers across segments—especially independent and boutique hotels—praise its customization, operational efficiency, and support.
Uplisting lacks recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Its niche appeal and absence of feedback mean it’s less validated by user experience.
Given the recent review volume and high ratings, Infor HMS is clearly preferred by hoteliers. It’s the safer bet for your hotel’s management needs.
Edge: Infor HMS
Pricing data for both systems is unavailable. Neither product offers a freemium model or clear monthly or per-room fees. Implementation costs and trial options are also not specified, suggesting that quotes are likely provided upon request.
Without transparent pricing, your decision should focus on feature fit and support quality rather than cost. Infor’s long-standing market presence and review volume suggest it may be a more substantial investment but also a more feature-rich solution.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, boutique, or primarily focused on short-term rentals with minimal complexity. Small independent hotels with straightforward needs might find Infor's extensive features overwhelming and too costly.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if your hotel is a large, full-service property needing detailed revenue management, extensive integrations, or multi-regional support. The platform may lack the depth and recent validation for larger or more complex operations.
Not ideal if:
Infor HMS is a comprehensive, scalable property management system built for hotels requiring deep functionality, integrations, and regional support. Its extensive features, support, and recent reviews position it as a reliable choice for medium to large hotels seeking operational excellence. Its broad application across hotel segments, especially boutiques and independents, underscores its versatility.
Uplisting, while designed for short-term rentals, lacks recent reviews or a broad feature set, limiting its applicability for larger hotels. Its automation capabilities are useful but only within a narrow scope, making it less suitable for comprehensive hotel management.
If your hotel is looking for a proven, feature-rich PMS with extensive support and integrations, Infor HMS is the clear choice. For small-scale rental operations with minimal complexity, Uplisting can be considered, but its current lack of validation is a concern.
Final verdict: For most hotels, especially those seeking a full-featured, reliable management system, Infor HMS outperforms Uplisting—stick with proven, recent feedback-backed solutions.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Infor HMS 和 Uplisting 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Infor HMS 提供 113 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Uplisting 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Infor HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 3.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Infor HMS:否。Uplisting:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Infor 的 HT Score 为 22,Uplisting 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问