The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
WavePM |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #44 8 条评价 | #61 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #25 24 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #19 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #24 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
WavePM |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #28 24 条评价 | #66 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #23 26 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #29 8 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #31 6 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
WavePM |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 20 条评价 | #61 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #24 17 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #28 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Infor HMS and WavePM hinges on what your hotel needs most. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they approach the problem differently. Infor HMS offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with a focus on larger hotels and regions, while WavePM presents a lightweight, AI-driven solution with a primary focus on property managers and owners. Your decision should align with your hotel’s size, complexity, and regional presence. Are you looking for a robust, full-featured PMS or a more agile, AI-enabled management tool?
Infor HMS and WavePM aim to enhance operational efficiency, improve guest experiences, and reduce manual tasks. Infor HMS, with a long-standing presence and 46 reviews, provides a broad suite of features including housekeeping, revenue management, and multi-lingual support, making it suitable for hotels with complex needs. WavePM, with only one review and zero recent reviews, emphasizes AI-powered insights and simplicity but lacks extensive hotel-specific functionalities. Given the limited recent data on WavePM, does it truly meet your hotel’s operational complexity?
Infor HMS benefits from a broad global presence, supporting hotels across multiple regions including North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. In contrast, WavePM’s market presence appears confined to a single country, which might limit scalability for hotels with regional or international operations. Both products aim to automate tasks and streamline workflows, but Infor’s established track record and extensive integration options make it more suited for hotels seeking a comprehensive solution. Are you prioritizing a proven, scalable platform or an emerging AI tool?
If your hotel requires a full-featured property management system capable of handling complex operations, seamless integrations, extensive customization, and regional support, Infor HMS is the clear choice. It’s especially appropriate if you need modules like revenue management, guest CRM, or automated night audits, which are absent in WavePM.
However, if your hotel is a small property, motel, or a manager seeking a lightweight platform driven by AI insights, WavePM might appeal due to its ease of use and modern architecture. But with only one review, its real-world performance and feature set remain unproven at scale.
For larger or multi-regional hotels, Infor’s 113 verified integrations and multi-lingual support make it a more reliable choice. Conversely, WavePM's focus on simplicity and AI-driven insights might serve small, tech-forward properties better—though the lack of recent reviews raises questions about its current viability. Is your hotel seeking a mature, scalable system or an innovative but untested platform?
Infor HMS boasts a generally favorable ease-of-use rating of 3.88/5, with many reviewers appreciating its navigability once familiar. Users highlight its straightforward housekeeping module and quick onboarding, though some mention the interface’s aesthetic and occasional bugs during updates. Support responsiveness is praised, contributing to smoother staff adoption despite some initial learning curve.
WavePM scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with the single recent review describing it as a "First-Class System" that is highly flexible and modern. Its AI features aim to reduce complexity, and the platform’s lightweight design simplifies daily management tasks, making onboarding easier for property managers comfortable with new tech.
Edge: WavePM.
Infor HMS offers a detailed suite of 20 features exclusive to it, including a housekeeping module, online support, guest profiles, a calendar view, direct billing, central role management, multi-currency handling, payment processing, revenue management, ancillary revenue tracking, and automated night audits. These features address many operational facets that are critical for hotels managing multiple properties or complex workflows.
WavePM, with no unique features listed, appears to prioritize AI-driven insights and simplified property management. However, it lacks the extensive modules available in Infor HMS, making it less suitable for hotels needing comprehensive operational control.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS’s support is consistently rated at 4.04/5, with reviews praising the responsiveness, kindness, and professionalism of their support team. Many users appreciate their prompt assistance and detailed guidance, which is crucial for resolving issues during onboarding and daily operations.
WavePM also scores 4/5 in support ratings, but with only one recent review, the depth of customer service experience is limited. The available feedback suggests a similarly positive perception but lacks the volume and detail seen with Infor.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts a significant advantage with 113 verified integration partners, including leading systems like Priority Software, Trevo, Omnibees, and Zaplox. These integrations facilitate seamless data flow between PMS, revenue, booking, and payment systems, reducing manual entry and errors.
WavePM currently reports zero verified integrations, which limits its ability to connect with other hotel systems or third-party solutions. For hotels relying on a multi-platform ecosystem, Infor’s extensive integrations are a clear edge.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS, with 46 reviews and a 4.04/5 overall rating, is well-regarded by a diverse hotel segment. Hotels across independent, boutique, city center, and resort categories rate it positively, especially for its customization, operational efficiency, and support. Recent reviews emphasize its stability and feature depth.
WavePM, with only one review and a 0/5 overall rating, offers no meaningful data on hotel satisfaction. Its market presence and feedback are too limited to gauge how hoteliers view it at scale. Given the data, Infor’s reputation and review volume make it the more trusted choice.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for Infor HMS are not publicly available, indicating that costs are likely customized based on hotel size and needs. Typically, enterprise-level PMS solutions like Infor involve significant implementation fees, licensing, and support costs.
WavePM also does not list specific pricing, but the absence of tiered pricing or subscription models suggests a possibly simplified or unpublicized cost structure. Without concrete numbers, evaluating value becomes difficult—though Infor’s broader feature set and support imply higher investment.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Infor HMS is a mature, extensive property management system suited for hotels with complex needs, regional operations, or multiple revenue streams. Its strong review volume, recent positive feedback, and feature depth make it the safer choice for most larger hotels.
WavePM presents an attractive option for small properties or managers seeking a simple, AI-enabled platform. However, with limited recent reviews and no proven integrations, its effectiveness at scale remains uncertain.
If your hotel requires a comprehensive, flexible solution with proven support and broad integrations, Infor HMS should be your choice. For small, tech-savvy properties looking for quick, AI-driven management, WavePM might serve you—though caution is advised given the limited data.
In summary: For most hotels, especially those with operational complexity or regional needs, Infor HMS offers the stability, features, and support needed to succeed. WavePM could fit niche cases but lacks the proven track record and scale that many hoteliers value.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Infor HMS 和 WavePM 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Infor HMS 提供 113 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 WavePM 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。WavePM 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 3.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Infor HMS:否。WavePM:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Infor 的 HT Score 为 22,WavePM 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问