The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 47 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Infor 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Winner Hotel Software 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 47 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 47 | 0 |
在分析了 47 条经验证的评价后,Infor 用户最看重其 易于使用, 报告, 一体化,而 Winner Hotel Software 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
报告
▾
|
|
|
+
一体化
▾
|
|
|
+
家政模块
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持
▾
|
|
|
−
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
−
更新问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #44 8 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #25 24 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #19 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #24 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #28 24 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #23 26 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #29 8 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #31 6 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 20 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #24 17 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #28 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) for your hotel involves balancing features, usability, support, and regional presence. Infor HMS by Infor and Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) are both established players, but they serve different hotel profiles and offer distinct advantages. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, location, and specific operational needs, so understanding their core differences is essential.
Infor HMS emphasizes extensive customization, a broad feature set, and a global presence, while Winner PMS offers a straightforward, highly rated user experience with strong integrations and a focus on operational efficiency. Which of these aligns best with your hotel’s priorities?
Infor HMS and Winner PMS both aim to streamline hotel operations and improve guest experiences, but they approach these goals differently. Infor HMS, launched in 1999 and boasting over 40,000 employees, is a comprehensive, cloud-based solution with a rich feature set tailored to larger or more complex hotels. It offers modules like housekeeping, revenue management, and guest CRM, which suit properties seeking an all-in-one platform.
Winner PMS, with a smaller dedicated team, is highly praised for its intuitive interface and ease of use. It centralizes core hotel functions—reservations, check-ins, billing—and is favored by hotels that prioritize quick onboarding and operational simplicity. Both systems integrate with numerous third-party tools; however, Infor’s 113 verified partners far surpass Winner’s single verified partner, Mews, and indicate a broader ecosystem.
If your hotel needs a customizable, scalable platform with specific features like revenue management or multi-lingual support, Infor HMS is a compelling choice. Conversely, if your priority is a straightforward, reliable solution with minimal training hurdles, Winner PMS might be more suitable.
If your hotel demands a highly customizable platform with advanced features such as central housekeeping, multi-currency processing, and detailed revenue reporting, Infor HMS is worth your consideration. Its extensive feature set—20 exclusive features—supports complex operations, making it ideal for luxury hotels, resorts, and boutique properties seeking granular control.
On the other hand, if your hotel values a simple, easy-to-implement system with high user satisfaction, Winner PMS excels. Its user ratings are far superior, with near-universal praise for ease of use, and its robust integration with Mews and other systems ensures smooth workflows.
For hotels with a global footprint and a need for broad customization, Infor’s regional presence in North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and the Middle East makes it suitable. If your hotel is smaller, or you prioritize quick deployment and user-friendly design, Winner PMS is a better fit.
Infor HMS scores 3.88 out of 5 for ease of use across its 46 reviews, with many guests citing that once familiar, the system is intuitive. Its onboarding process is rated 3.64/5, and users highlight that the web-based interface is convenient, though some find the UI lacks modern aesthetics.
Winner PMS, however, has a perfect ease of use rating in available reviews, praised extensively for its simple, intuitive interface that minimizes training time. Its onboarding is straightforward, with users mentioning that staff can get up and running quickly, reducing operational disruptions.
Edge: Winner PMS.
Infor HMS offers 20 unique features, including a housekeeping module, online 24/7 support, guest profiles, a calendar view, direct billing, multi-lingual support, mobile app, multi-currency processing, revenue management, and automated night audit, among others. These features cater to properties that need detailed operational control and customization.
Winner PMS's feature count isn’t specified, but its core functionalities—reservations, billing, housekeeping—are highly rated for their reliability and ease. Its strong integrations with over 100 verified partners, including Mews, enhance operational connectivity, although it lacks some advanced modules like revenue management.
For hotels needing extensive customization, revenue tools, and multi-lingual capabilities, Infor HMS has a clear edge. But if core features with seamless integrations suffice, Winner PMS provides a reliable, user-friendly platform.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS’s support scores 4.04 out of 5, with reviews emphasizing promptness, professionalism, and helpful problem resolution. Many users appreciate the support team's responsiveness, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting.
Winner PMS’s customer support ratings are not explicitly available, but reviews frequently mention its responsiveness and reliability. Given the smaller user base and less documented feedback, Infor’s support appears more established and positively reviewed.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts 113 verified partner integrations, including prominent names like Priority Software, Trevo, Omnibees, and more. This extensive network enables hotels to connect seamlessly with booking engines, revenue tools, and other operational platforms, reducing manual data entry.
Winner PMS has only one verified partner, Mews, highlighting a limited integration ecosystem. While Mews integration is robust for core operations, it restricts options for broader connectivity.
If your hotel relies on diverse third-party systems or plans to expand integrations, Infor HMS provides a significant advantage. For basic needs, Winner PMS’s limited but reliable Mews integration may suffice.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS has 46 reviews with an average rating of 4.04/5, and a 74% likelihood to recommend. Its reviews span a range of hotel types, with many praising its customization and operational modules, especially in boutique and city center hotels.
Winner PMS’s reviews are unavailable, but given its near-perfect ease of use ratings and strong customer support reputation, it likely scores higher in user satisfaction, particularly among smaller hotels and properties prioritizing simplicity.
Considering recent review activity, Infor HMS’s more extensive and recent feedback makes it the more reliably rated product.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for Infor HMS are not publicly available, suggesting tailored quotes based on hotel size and requirements. It’s likely to be a premium cost given its extensive features and global presence.
Winner PMS also does not publish specific pricing, but its approach typically involves custom quotes. Both solutions require contacting sales for precise pricing.
In your decision, consider that Infor HMS’s broader feature set and integrations indicate a higher investment, appropriate for larger or complex hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, boutique, or needs minimal setup with quick onboarding.
Not ideal if you require advanced features such as revenue management or multi-lingual support.
Infor HMS provides a comprehensive, customizable platform with a broad feature set and extensive integration network. It’s best for larger hotels or those with complex operational needs that can justify a higher investment.
Winner PMS offers a highly rated, user-friendly experience with strong core features and seamless integrations, making it ideal for smaller or mid-sized hotels prioritizing ease and reliability.
If you need a scalable, feature-rich system with regional flexibility, Infor HMS is the stronger choice. For hotels seeking simplicity and quick deployment, Winner PMS delivers proven value.
In conclusion, choose Infor HMS if your hotel demands detailed customization and a broad ecosystem. Opt for Winner PMS if your focus is on ease, speed, and reliable core operations.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Infor HMS 和 Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 8 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Infor HMS 和 Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Infor HMS 提供 113 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Infor HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 3.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Infor HMS:否。Winner PMS (acquired by Mews):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Infor 的 HT Score 为 22,Winner Hotel Software 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问