The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 27 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #3 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #3 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #3 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 25 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #3 51 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #3 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #2 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Ingenico and Zil Money for your hotel’s payment processing needs hinges on your priorities. Ingenico, with its longstanding presence and global reach, aims to provide a comprehensive payment infrastructure, but it has no recent reviews or user feedback. Zil Money, on the other hand, boasts a strong recent review base, with 54 reviews in the last six months and an 87% likelihood to recommend, making it a more reliable choice for hoteliers today.
Both products aim to streamline payments, yet they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Are you seeking a proven, globally recognized platform or a newer, more actively reviewed solution? Let’s compare both to help you decide.
Ingenico’s platform, founded in 1974 and with over 3,700 employees, is a giant in the payment processing industry, offering a broad suite of security standards and integration capabilities. Yet, it lacks recent user reviews or detailed feedback, casting doubt on its current usability and support quality.
Zil Money, founded in 2018, is a smaller but highly reviewed platform with 54 recent reviews, all within the last six months. Its ease of use and customer support ratings—both at 4.5/5—are backed by newer feedback, and its 87% likelihood to recommend indicates strong user satisfaction.
While Ingenico remains largely untested in recent user experience, Zil Money’s current review data suggests it is a more dependable choice. Does your hotel need a legacy platform or one with recent, active user validation?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-use payment system with a high probability of user satisfaction, Zil Money is the clear choice. Its 4.5/5 ease of use and customer support ratings, coupled with a recent review count, make it suitable for hotels seeking quick deployment and reliable service.
If your hotel requires broad integration with existing systems and global reach, Ingenico might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews or active user feedback, its suitability today is uncertain. For most hotels, Zil Money’s current ratings and features make it the more practical option.
In summary, choose Zil Money if you prioritize recent reviews, ease of use, and customer support. Opt for Ingenico only if you need a legacy platform with extensive international infrastructure and are prepared to navigate unverified recent performance.
Zil Money’s user interface scores 4.5 out of 5, with reviews highlighting its simplicity and straightforward process that reduces onboarding time. Customers praise its intuitive design, which streamlines invoicing, payments, and account management, making staff adoption quick.
Ingenico, by contrast, has a review score of 0/5 for ease of use, and there are no recent reviews to gauge current usability or onboarding experience. Given the available data, your team is likely to find Zil Money significantly easier to implement and daily operate.
Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money offers 15 features, including Pay by Link, recurring payments, multi-currency settlements, contactless payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay, and payment splitting—features critical for modern hotel operations. It also supports virtual cards, international payments, and offers customizable check printing.
Ingenico provides no listed features or integrations, making it impossible to compare feature sets directly. Its lack of recent reviews or detailed feature documentation suggests it may not be as competitive in today’s hotel payment landscape.
Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money’s 4.5/5 customer support rating reflects recent positive feedback, with users appreciating timely and helpful responses. The platform’s onboarding process is similarly rated at 4.16/5, indicating a smoother setup experience.
Ingenico scores 0/5 on support, with no recent reviews to validate support quality or responsiveness. Given the current review data, Zil Money clearly offers more reliable and accessible customer assistance.
Edge: Zil Money.
Ingenico integrates with one verified partner, myCloud Hospitality PMS, offering tailored hotel payment solutions. Zil Money, however, currently supports no verified integrations but boasts a comprehensive API for custom connections, along with multiple banking partnerships.
While Ingenico’s integration count is limited, Zil Money’s flexibility through API access can compensate, provided your hotel has technical resources to implement custom integrations. Still, in terms of verified, ready-to-use integrations, Ingenico is ahead.
Edge: Ingenico.
Zil Money’s recent reviews show an 87% likelihood to recommend, with ratings favoring ease of use, support, and overall satisfaction. Its users include a variety of hotel types, from luxury to budget, with positive comments emphasizing reliability and simplicity.
Ingenico has no recent ratings or reviews, so there’s no current user sentiment to evaluate. Its historical reputation is less relevant without recent data, making Zil Money the clear favorite among active users.
Edge: Zil Money.
Ingenico's pricing details are not publicly available, and it does not offer a freemium or trial option. Being a large enterprise platform, its costs tend to be customized, often higher, and less transparent.
Zil Money charges a flat base price of $400, with no mention of hidden fees, and offers a 15-day free trial. Its transparent pricing and trial availability make it easier for your hotel to evaluate value before commitment.
In brief, Zil Money provides clearer, more accessible pricing information.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in their market validation: Zil Money’s recent reviews and high recommendation rate contrast sharply with Ingenico’s lack of recent feedback. Zil Money’s current user satisfaction, ease of use, and feature set make it the clear choice for modern hotels.
Choose Zil Money if you want a platform with active support, proven usability, and a comprehensive feature set suitable for diverse property types. It’s especially ideal if your hotel values transparency, quick onboarding, and recent positive user experiences.
Opt for Ingenico only if your hotel operates at a large scale, requires global multi-currency handling, and already benefits from its existing integrations and security infrastructure. Otherwise, Zil Money’s current review-backed strengths make it the safer, more responsive choice.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞 Zil Money 的直观界面,简化了发票、费用跟踪和其他财务任务。该平台的易用性缩短了入门时间并提高了运营效率。
一些评论表明,客户体验的一些细微改进,例如简化验证流程和减少设置时间,可以使平台更加高效和用户友好。
许多用户强调了 Zil Money 支付处理功能的速度和可靠性,这确保了及时交易并支持酒店的现金流管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户看重Zil Money与各种会计和财务软件无缝集成的能力,这有助于整合财务运营并提高效率。
用户建议扩大与更多第三方应用程序的集成,这将提供更多的灵活性和定制性,满足不同的业务需求。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Ingenico 和 Zil Money 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Ingenico 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zil Money 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Zil Money 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Ingenico:否。Zil Money:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Ingenico 的 HT Score 为 0,Zil Money 的为 63。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问