The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Stay247 |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #9 51 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #20 12 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #19 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Stay247 |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #11 35 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #20 11 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #17 8 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #11 7 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Stay247 |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 83 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #24 5 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #22 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing a channel management solution is pivotal for your hotel's online visibility and revenue growth. innRoad’s Channel Manager and Stay247’s system both aim to streamline your distribution, but they differ significantly in features, support, and market presence. With innRoad boasting a robust review base and comprehensive functionalities, it’s clear which product currently holds the advantage. Are you ready to find out which one best fits your needs?
innRoad has established itself as a leader in hotel channel management, with a high customer approval rating backed by 64 recent reviews and a 4.88/5 overall rating. Stay247, on the other hand, has no recent reviews or rating data, making it difficult to assess its current performance or user satisfaction. innRoad’s extensive feature set, proven support, and market presence make it the more reliable choice for hoteliers. Do you want a proven solution with real user feedback?
If your hotel needs a trusted, feature-rich channel manager with a strong support network, innRoad is the clear pick. It offers 49 unique features, including a property management system, booking engine, multi-currency support, and extensive integrations. InnRoad’s reputation is reinforced by its large user base across North America, Europe, and Asia, and a solid 91% likelihood to recommend among existing users. Stay247’s lack of reviews and feature data suggests it’s untested at this point. If you prioritize reliability and proven performance, innRoad is the safer bet.
innRoad receives a 4.53/5 score for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive UI and onboarding process. Customers highlight its responsive support and comprehensive training, which ease staff adoption. However, some users mention that the interface could be more modern and mobile experience improved, especially on iPhone. Since Stay247 offers little to no review data, it's impossible to gauge its usability. Edge:innRoad.
innRoad’s platform offers 49 distinct features, including a full PMS, booking engine, group booking, housekeeping module, native email marketing, and 2-way real-time channel integrations. Stay247’s system currently lacks detailed feature information or third-party integrations, limiting its appeal. InnRoad’s capabilities enable complex operations and customization, providing a significant edge. If you need advanced functionalities, innRoad clearly leads.
innRoad’s support scores a 4.64/5, with reviews emphasizing its 24/7 availability, knowledgeable staff, and ongoing training. Customers appreciate the quick responsiveness and friendly service, which help minimize downtime. Since Stay247 has no available support ratings or reviews, it’s difficult to assess its service quality. Based on current data, innRoad’s support remains the stronger choice, especially for hotels requiring reliable assistance.
innRoad boasts 34 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, Google, Airbnb, and Vrbo, along with integrations for QuickBooks, Revinate, and more. Stay247’s platform currently lists no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with essential third-party tools. InnRoad’s extensive partner network offers flexibility and enhanced operational capabilities. If integrations are vital to your operations, innRoad’s broader ecosystem makes it the obvious winner.
innRoad’s ratings reflect a highly satisfied user base: a 4.88/5 overall, with recent reviews confirming its value. Hotels across various segments, including boutique, motels, and resorts, consistently express satisfaction with its features and support. Conversely, Stay247 has no recent reviews or user feedback, so its rating status remains unknown. The strength of innRoad’s reviews indicates higher confidence among hoteliers. For proven performance and user approval, innRoad is the superior choice.
Pricing details for innRoad are not publicly listed, but it is known that the platform does not charge implementation fees, offers a monthly flat rate, and does not require per-room fees. Stay247 also provides no specific pricing information, suggesting it may operate on a similar or custom basis. Given the lack of transparent pricing, your decision should consider the value reflected in innRoad’s extensive feature set and support services versus the untested nature of Stay247.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
innRoad offers a comprehensive, well-supported channel management solution with proven user satisfaction, extensive features, and a broad integration network. Its large review base and recent feedback confirm its reliability, making it suitable for hotels seeking a mature system. Stay247, lacking recent reviews and detailed features, remains an unverified option, best avoided unless you are experimenting or have specific, minimal needs.
If your priority is a trusted, feature-rich platform with ongoing support, innRoad is your clear choice. Its extensive integrations, proven reliability, and positive user feedback make it a safe investment for most hotels. Conversely, if your hotel is small, with minimal distribution needs, and you’re open to trying newer solutions, Stay247 could be considered—but with caution.
In summary, innRoad is the more dependable, tested, and supported option for hotels aiming to optimize distribution. For now, it remains the recommended choice in this comparison, especially given the lack of recent validation for Stay247.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
全天候客户支持因其可用性和响应性而受到称赞。用户强调技术团队的支持性和知识渊博性,这对于及时解决技术问题至关重要。
用户界面通常被描述为用户友好且直观,便于培训新员工。但是,一些用户认为某些区域(如团体预订模块)可以从更现代、更精简的设计中受益。
用户看重软件的自定义选项,尤其是面向客人的外观和计费功能。但是,在更直观的界面和额外的自定义功能方面仍有改进空间。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户报告了偶尔出现的错误和性能问题,例如系统冻结和加载时间缓慢。这些故障虽然通常可以控制,但可能会扰乱操作并影响用户满意度。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。innRoad Channel Manager 和 Stay247 Channel Management 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。innRoad Channel Manager 提供 34 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stay247 Channel Management 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad Channel Manager 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
innRoad Channel Manager:否。Stay247 Channel Management:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。innRoad 的 HT Score 为 22,Stay247 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问