The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 追加销售软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 17 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 13 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 6 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #12 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #11 14 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #13 12 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #10 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #7 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #16 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #5 36 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #11 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #8 1 条评价 |
Choosing between iSeatz and MyStay hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to boost ancillary revenue and improve guest experiences but approach these goals differently. iSeatz is a well-established ancillary booking engine with a focus on customized shopping experiences, while MyStay emphasizes streamlined communication, contactless check-in, and upselling through automation. Your decision should reflect whether you prioritize a broad booking engine or a flexible guest engagement platform.
While iSeatz has been around since 1999 with a focus on large-scale travel bookings, it lacks recent reviews and active user feedback. Conversely, MyStay boasts 41 recent reviews and a high NPS score, making it the more reliable choice for current hotel operations. Do you want a platform with proven recent performance or one that’s more established historically?
iSeatz offers a sophisticated booking engine primarily tailored for ancillary products like upgrades, experiences, or loyalty redemptions, powering over $4 billion in travel bookings annually. Its strength lies in creating highly customized shopping journeys for guests, making it ideal for large hotel brands or operators seeking to expand their revenue streams through complex ancillary sales.
MyStay, on the other hand, provides a guest communication and upselling platform with a focus on contactless check-in/out, automated messaging, and personalized offers. It integrates seamlessly with PMS systems, making it especially suitable for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency, guest engagement, and immediate revenue uplift from everyday services.
If your property needs a flexible, high-volume ancillary engine, iSeatz is the better fit. If your goal is to enhance guest communication, simplify check-in, and increase daily revenue via personalized upselling, MyStay is the strong choice. Are you seeking a broad booking engine or a guest engagement tool?
If your hotel needs a modern, easy-to-use upselling and guest communication platform with proven recent reviews, go with MyStay. It’s best for properties that want contactless check-in, automated messaging, and targeted upselling to increase revenue per guest.
If your hotel requires a highly customizable ancillary booking engine capable of handling complex product configurations and building brand loyalty, fallback on iSeatz. It’s suitable for large, tech-savvy brands aiming to integrate ancillary sales deeply into their booking process.
For hotels aiming to modernize guest interactions and boost daily revenues, MyStay offers a straightforward, well-rated solution. Those needing a comprehensive ancillary platform with extensive customization and integrations should consider iSeatz.
In summary: choose MyStay for ease, automation, and recent performance; choose iSeatz for advanced ancillary booking capabilities. Which approach aligns better with your hotel’s strategic goals?
MyStay scores a near-perfect 4.85/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and seamless PMS integration. Users highlight how simple it is to manage personalized messaging and upselling campaigns, with support for contactless check-in/out.
iSeatz, however, has a 0/5 ease-of-use rating, with no recent reviews to substantiate its usability. Given the lack of feedback, it’s difficult to gauge how easily your team would adopt or operate the platform.
Edge: MyStay.
iSeatz offers no exclusive features beyond its core ancillary booking engine. In contrast, MyStay boasts nine unique features, including guest segmentation, room upgrade merchandising, multi-channel delivery (email, SMS, WhatsApp), ancillary product merchandising, offer templates, offer orchestration, digital payments, and A/B testing.
These features enable personalized guest targeting and automated marketing, which are absent from iSeatz. For hotels seeking dynamic, customizable upselling and marketing tools, MyStay’s feature set clearly outperforms.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay’s recent reviews consistently praise its support, with a 4.85/5 support rating and comments about quick, helpful responses and ongoing assistance. Guests note that support is “close and always ready to help,” making onboarding and daily operations smoother.
iSeatz, however, has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to assess the quality of its customer service. Without recent feedback, MyStay’s support reputation makes it the safer choice.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay offers connections with over 30 verified partners, including major PMS and channel management systems like Priority Software, Kwentra, and WuBook. It integrates with numerous third-party services, facilitating smoother operations and guest engagement.
iSeatz currently has no verified integrations, limiting its flexibility and ease of connection with existing hotel systems. For hotels that require a platform that plays well with their current tech stack, MyStay has the clear lead.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay’s recent reviews consistently rate the platform at 4.82/5, with high scores across all hotel segments, including boutique hotels, serviced apartments, and city center hotels. Hotels particularly appreciate the platform’s ease of use, support, and ability to increase revenue through personalization.
iSeatz, lacking recent reviews and user feedback, offers no credible recent ratings. The absence of current customer sentiment makes MyStay the more trusted option based on recent ratings.
Edge: MyStay.
iSeatz does not publicly disclose pricing, and no trial or freemium options are available, suggesting a potentially high or custom quote-based fee structure.
MyStay charges a flat rate of $400 per month with no additional implementation or setup fees, providing clear and predictable costs. Its straightforward pricing makes budgeting easier and reduces surprises.
Not ideal if you prefer a ready-to-use, simple guest engagement platform or lack the resources for complex integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a highly customizable ancillary booking engine or operates in regions where MyStay’s presence isn’t established.
The core difference is that iSeatz is a specialized ancillary booking engine geared toward large-scale, complex product offerings, whereas MyStay is a guest engagement platform focused on contactless solutions, automation, and upselling.
If your hotel needs a robust, customizable booking engine to drive incremental revenue, iSeatz’s track record and scale make it appealing—though it lacks recent reviews. For properties seeking a highly-rated, easy-to-use platform that boosts revenue through automated communication, personalized offers, and contactless check-in, MyStay is the clear choice, especially given its recent 41 reviews and high NPS score.
In conclusion, your selection should depend on whether you prioritize advanced ancillary sales or enhanced guest engagement. Based on current reviews and features, MyStay is the more reliable option for most modern hoteliers today.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
有些用户要求在自动消息传递和内容呈现方面有更多自定义选项。他们希望在编辑模板和与多家酒店或特定 PMS 系统集成方面有更大的自由度。还要求基于语言的货币自... 有些用户要求在自动消息传递和内容呈现方面有更多自定义选项。他们希望在编辑模板和与多家酒店或特定 PMS 系统集成方面有更大的自由度。还要求基于语言的货币自定义和更多文本编辑选项。
用户强调在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通的能力。MyStay 提供自动消息传递和住宿及活动相关信息共享功能,打造个性化体验。此功能有助于及时... 用户强调在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通的能力。MyStay 提供自动消息传递和住宿及活动相关信息共享功能,打造个性化体验。此功能有助于及时满足客人需求并提高整体满意度。
MyStay 因其高效、快速的入住流程而广受好评。客人可以在抵达前在线办理入住手续,这节省了时间并减少了前台排队的情况。该流程包括电子签名和身份验证。此功能... MyStay 因其高效、快速的入住流程而广受好评。客人可以在抵达前在线办理入住手续,这节省了时间并减少了前台排队的情况。该流程包括电子签名和身份验证。此功能在疫情期间因其非接触式功能而特别受重视。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
MyStay 与 PMS 系统的集成是一个关键问题。虽然许多人对这种集成表示赞赏,但有些用户遇到了困难并要求更顺畅的连接。与 PMS 更好地同步可以进一步提高平台的可... MyStay 与 PMS 系统的集成是一个关键问题。虽然许多人对这种集成表示赞赏,但有些用户遇到了困难并要求更顺畅的连接。与 PMS 更好地同步可以进一步提高平台的可用性和便利性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。iSeatz 和 MyStay 共享许多核心 Upselling Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。iSeatz 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 MyStay 提供 30 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。MyStay 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
iSeatz:否。MyStay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Upselling Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。iSeatz 的 HT Score 为 0,MyStay 的为 19。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问