The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 140 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
MyStay 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 .
Oracle Hospitality 表现出色 在 综合费率管理工具 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Check-in upselling.
基于 HTR 上 140 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | From $100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 45 | 95 |
在分析了 140 条经验证的评价后,MyStay 用户最看重其 定制和灵活性, 与宾客沟通, 高效的办理登机手续,而 Oracle Hospitality 用户则强调 综合费率管理工具, 基于云的功能, 与第三方系统集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
+
综合费率管理工具
▾
|
|
+
与宾客沟通
▾
|
+
基于云的功能
▾
|
|
+
高效的办理登机手续
▾
|
+
与第三方系统集成
▾
|
|
+
非接触式服务
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
与 PMS 集成
▾
|
−
复杂性和学习曲线
▾
|
|
−
成本问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 追加销售软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 17 条评价 | #13 3 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | #6 35 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #11 6 条评价 | #4 39 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #12 2 条评价 | #7 11 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #11 14 条评价 | #6 41 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #13 12 条评价 | #5 56 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 13 条评价 | #4 53 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #7 6 条评价 | #8 8 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #16 1 条评价 | #5 29 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #5 36 条评价 | #12 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 1 条评价 | #3 36 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #8 1 条评价 | #6 6 条评价 |
Choosing the right upselling software for your hotel can significantly impact guest satisfaction and revenue. MyStay by MyStay and Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement and Merchandising aim to enhance your guest experience while increasing revenue, but they approach this goal differently. MyStay focuses heavily on contactless communication, digital upselling, and ease of use, whereas Oracle’s platform emphasizes AI-driven personalization and broad system integration. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s specific needs?
Both MyStay and Oracle Hospitality cater to hotels aiming to boost revenue through upselling and guest engagement. MyStay is designed for ease of implementation, with a focus on contactless services, automated communication, and personalized digital marketing. Conversely, Oracle’s platform offers a more extensive, AI-powered upsell system that automates personalized offers throughout the guest journey. Do you want a straightforward, contactless approach or an AI-driven, highly integrated system?
MyStay's strength lies in its user-friendly interface and quick onboarding, backed by a high review count and recent feedback. Oracle’s solution, with a higher review count and more recent reviews, indicates a broader market presence and ongoing innovation. Are you prioritizing ease of use or advanced automation?
If your hotel needs a simple, contactless upselling and communication platform with quick deployment, go with MyStay. It’s ideal for boutique hotels, serviced apartments, or properties seeking a straightforward digital guest experience. If your hotel requires a system that leverages AI to automate personalized offers and integrates deeply with your existing property management system, Oracle OPERA is the better fit. It suits larger chains or hotels with complex operations that can leverage extensive integrations.
For hotels valuing high user ratings, MyStay’s 41 reviews with a 4.82/5 overall rating and recent feedback emphasize its reliability. Oracle, with 78 reviews and a 4.31/5 rating, offers broader functionalities but may involve more complexity and higher costs. Which approach aligns with your hotel's scale and sophistication?
MyStay scores higher in ease of use with a rating of 4.85/5 compared to Oracle’s 4.64/5. Reviewers praise MyStay’s intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and minimal training requirements. Many users mention how quickly their staff adapted to the platform, appreciating features like automated communication and contactless check-in.
Oracle’s platform, while comprehensive, is recognized for its steep learning curve due to its extensive features and advanced AI capabilities. Smaller hotels or teams with limited technical resources may find Oracle more challenging to implement effectively. Edge: MyStay.
MyStay offers 9 shared features, primarily focused on contactless communication, digital upselling, and guest preferences management. It includes digital marketing, automated messaging, online check-in/out, QR code promotions, and a smart catalog tailored to each guest.
Oracle’s platform provides 13 features, including check-in upselling, dynamic upgrade pricing, multi-property dashboards, and Type 2 SOC 2 data security certifications. Its AI-driven automation and extensive system integrations set it apart but come with increased complexity.
While Oracle’s feature set is broader, MyStay’s focus on ease of use and core functionalities makes it more accessible for most hotels. Edge: Oracle Hospitality.
MyStay’s support ratings stand at 4.85/5, with reviewers highlighting quick response times, proactive assistance, and ongoing feature development. Many mention that support staff are responsive and helpful, making onboarding smoother.
Oracle’s support scores lower at 4.18/5, with reviews citing difficulties in navigating complex features and occasional delays in assistance. Hotels with limited technical staff may find Oracle’s support less accessible. Edge: MyStay.
Oracle’s platform boasts 391 verified integrations, including popular PMS, POS, and analytics systems. Shared partners include some major players like SiteMinder and Mews, with additional unique integrations such as Criton and Innspire, enabling extensive system connectivity.
MyStay has 30 verified partners, including key integrations with PMS and channel managers like RoomRaccoon and WuBook. Although fewer in number, these integrations cover essential hotel operations efficiently.
If you prioritize wide system compatibility, Oracle’s extensive integrations are a significant advantage. For streamlined, hotel-specific connections, MyStay’s curated list might suffice. Edge: Oracle Hospitality.
MyStay’s 41 recent reviews give it a top rating of 4.82/5, with particularly high scores from boutique, serviced apartment, and city-center hotels. Reviewers emphasize its ease of use, quick onboarding, and effective upselling.
Oracle’s 78 reviews rate it at 4.31/5, with higher ratings from luxury hotels and larger properties. Smaller properties or independent hotels may find Oracle’s system overly complex, whereas MyStay’s simplicity resonates more broadly.
Overall, MyStay’s recent reviews and higher ratings indicate a stronger user satisfaction. Edge: MyStay.
MyStay prices at $400 per month with no trial or freemium options, reflecting its targeted, all-in-one platform. Its pricing is transparent but may be steep for small hotels or properties with tight budgets.
Oracle offers a lower base price of $100 per month but emphasizes a performance-based revenue model, often involving additional costs for customization and integrations. The total expense can escalate depending on hotel size and required features.
If budget is a primary concern, Oracle’s lower entry price might be attractive, but total costs could vary significantly. For predictable expenses and streamlined features, MyStay’s flat fee offers clarity.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
MyStay and Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement and Merchandising serve different hotel profiles. MyStay excels in ease of use, quick setup, and high user satisfaction, making it ideal for small to mid-sized properties that want a straightforward upselling platform.
Oracle offers a more feature-rich, AI-powered upselling system with extensive integrations, suited for larger properties or hotel groups that can invest in a more complex, customizable solution.
Choose MyStay if you need a user-friendly, contactless upselling tool that gets results fast. Opt for Oracle if your hotel can leverage AI automation, integration capabilities, and is prepared for a more involved implementation.
In summary, for most independent or boutique hotels seeking simplicity and immediate benefits, MyStay is the better choice. Larger hotels or chains looking for advanced automation and system depth should consider Oracle OPERA.
追加销售软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,MyStay 和 Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement and Merchandising 共享 9 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 类型 2 认证(数据安全) | ||
| 办理登机手续追加销售 | ||
| 动态升级定价 | ||
| 多物业/连锁仪表盘 |
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"With success hinging on so many unknown variables in an altered marketplace, Nor1 provides me with a sense of control. In the times that we’re in, that’s priceless."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
有些用户要求在自动消息传递和内容呈现方面有更多自定义选项。他们希望在编辑模板和与多家酒店或特定 PMS 系统集成方面有更大的自由度。还要求基于语言的货币自... 有些用户要求在自动消息传递和内容呈现方面有更多自定义选项。他们希望在编辑模板和与多家酒店或特定 PMS 系统集成方面有更大的自由度。还要求基于语言的货币自定义和更多文本编辑选项。
用户强调在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通的能力。MyStay 提供自动消息传递和住宿及活动相关信息共享功能,打造个性化体验。此功能有助于及时... 用户强调在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通的能力。MyStay 提供自动消息传递和住宿及活动相关信息共享功能,打造个性化体验。此功能有助于及时满足客人需求并提高整体满意度。
MyStay 因其高效、快速的入住流程而广受好评。客人可以在抵达前在线办理入住手续,这节省了时间并减少了前台排队的情况。该流程包括电子签名和身份验证。此功能... MyStay 因其高效、快速的入住流程而广受好评。客人可以在抵达前在线办理入住手续,这节省了时间并减少了前台排队的情况。该流程包括电子签名和身份验证。此功能在疫情期间因其非接触式功能而特别受重视。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
MyStay 与 PMS 系统的集成是一个关键问题。虽然许多人对这种集成表示赞赏,但有些用户遇到了困难并要求更顺畅的连接。与 PMS 更好地同步可以进一步提高平台的可... MyStay 与 PMS 系统的集成是一个关键问题。虽然许多人对这种集成表示赞赏,但有些用户遇到了困难并要求更顺畅的连接。与 PMS 更好地同步可以进一步提高平台的可用性和便利性。
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户称赞OPERA的集成费率管理功能,它简化了日常运营,使员工能够专注于追加销售和交叉销售。尽管有些人觉得操作繁琐,但这款工具可以帮助员工通过清晰、精简的... 用户称赞OPERA的集成费率管理功能,它简化了日常运营,使员工能够专注于追加销售和交叉销售。尽管有些人觉得操作繁琐,但这款工具可以帮助员工通过清晰、精简的流程优化收入潜力。
OPERA 的云特性因其减少对本地服务器的依赖、改善远程访问以及确保无缝更新而备受赞誉。这些功能在统一运营和维持有效的追加销售策略方面具有显著优势。
OPERA 以其强大的集成能力而备受赞誉,其集成能力涵盖 POS 系统和分析系统等众多第三方系统。这种广泛的集成有助于统一酒店运营和数据,从而创造更有意义的追加... OPERA 以其强大的集成能力而备受赞誉,其集成能力涵盖 POS 系统和分析系统等众多第三方系统。这种广泛的集成有助于统一酒店运营和数据,从而创造更有意义的追加销售机会,并优化宾客体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户反映,OPERA 的众多功能导致学习难度加大,入职流程复杂。这对小型酒店的影响更大,因为它们的培训资源可能有限,从而引发成本和效率方面的担忧。
OPERA 的高昂成本(包括许可、实施和定制)给小型或单体酒店带来了障碍。虽然 OPERA 功能强大,但对于预算紧张的酒店来说,这些成本可能超过其带来的好处。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。MyStay 和 Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement and Merchandising 共享许多核心 Upselling Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。MyStay 提供 30 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement and Merchandising 提供 391 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。MyStay 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
MyStay:否。Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement and Merchandising:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Upselling Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。MyStay 的 HT Score 为 19,Oracle Hospitality 的为 78。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问