The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #29 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #38 2 条评价 | #22 18 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #42 0 条评价 | #14 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #10 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #24 15 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #42 1 条评价 | #23 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #18 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #40 0 条评价 | #19 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #36 0 条评价 | #18 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #35 2 条评价 | #20 12 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 14 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #14 3 条评价 |
Choosing a booking engine for your hotel hinges on your specific needs, operational priorities, and growth ambitions. Both Journey and Roiback aim to boost direct bookings, but they serve different types of hoteliers and offer varying features. Journey emphasizes ease of use and conversion focus with a very limited review base, while Roiback provides a broader feature set supported by a larger, more recent customer base. Which platform aligns best with your goals?
Journey is a mobile-first booking engine designed to turn browsing into direct bookings, with a focus on intuitive, high-conversion experiences. It boasts a simple, branded, visual layout that appeals to hotels prioritizing design and ease. In contrast, Roiback offers a comprehensive suite with 27 verified integrations, sophisticated analytics, and tools for multi-channel distribution, making it more suited for hotels seeking robust operational control. Do you prefer a straightforward, conversion-oriented platform or a more feature-rich, data-driven system?
If your hotel needs a platform with extensive integrations, detailed reporting, and advanced features like loyalty programs, Roiback is the better choice. It’s ideal for mid-to-large properties seeking to maximize direct revenue and streamline multi-channel management, especially given its 27 verified partners. Conversely, if your team values a fast, easy-to-implement booking engine that simplifies the user experience and boosts conversions with minimal fuss, Journey’s lightweight and user-friendly approach is more suitable. Which profile matches your hotel’s priorities?
Journey scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, reflecting its intuitive, mobile-first design with straightforward onboarding. Users describe it as a “simple, professional booking experience,” and support responsiveness enhances adoption. Roiback, rated 4.49/5, offers a user-friendly interface but with a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features and integrations. Its onboarding is rated slightly lower, and some users mention the complexity of the platform. Edge: Journey.
Journey provides 4 features unique to its platform, including automated reporting, flexible rate options, A/B testing, and availability blocking—each tailored for conversion optimization. Roiback, with 14 exclusive features, offers advanced tools like booking abandonment recapture, room substitutions, price comparison widgets, and loyalty integration, supporting complex pricing and marketing strategies. Both platforms share 22 features, but Roiback’s broader feature set makes it more versatile. Edge: Roiback.
Journey’s support, rated 5/5, is praised for quick responses, effective communication, and responsiveness to feedback. Users highlight its dedicated and attentive team, making onboarding and troubleshooting smooth. Roiback’s support, rated 4.72/5, is similarly well-regarded, with clients emphasizing their personalized consulting, responsiveness, and strategic guidance. However, Journey’s recent review count is minimal (only 2 in the last six months), limiting confidence in its support consistency. Edge: Journey.
Roiback excels with 27 verified integrations, including major channel managers, PMS, and tech suppliers like Oracle Hospitality, SiteMinder, and GuestCentric. Journey, with only 5 verified partners, includes key integrations like Stripe and Access Hospitality but falls short of Roiback’s extensive ecosystem. The broader integration network in Roiback provides greater flexibility and streamlining options. Edge: Roiback.
Roiback, with a 72.06/100 score, has a larger, more recent review base (43 reviews in the last six months), reflecting current user experiences. Its ratings are consistently high across support, onboarding, and value. Journey’s only 2 reviews, both recent, have given it perfect scores but lack the volume and diversity of feedback to confidently endorse it. For hoteliers prioritizing social proof, Roiback’s larger review pool provides more reliable validation. Edge: Roiback.
Journey does not list its pricing publicly, suggesting a custom quote approach, possibly reflecting a higher-end or bespoke solution. Roiback charges $500 per month, with no implementation fee or trial available, positioning it as a mid-priced platform with predictable costs. The lack of a free trial can be a barrier for some hotels testing new solutions.
Roiback and Journey serve distinct hotel segments with different priorities. Journey focuses on providing a quick, conversion-boosting experience with minimal fuss, ideal for smaller hotels or those new to direct bookings. Its recent reviews and higher overall ratings reflect a more current and confident user base.
Roiback, with more reviews and a broader feature set, appeals to hotels aiming for a comprehensive, data-rich platform to optimize revenue and manage multiple channels effectively. Its extensive integrations and support ecosystem make it a better choice for mid-to-large hotels with complex needs.
If your hotel values a simple, fast, and visually appealing booking engine, Journey is the logical pick. But if your goal is to leverage detailed analytics, marketing tools, and a versatile platform to grow your direct sales, Roiback is the more compelling option.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要... Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要作用。
Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有... Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有所提高。
关键反馈包括要求加快系统响应速度、减少重复和 404 错误等技术故障以及统一平台以简化流程。这些技术改进对于实现无缝用户体验至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台的用户友好型和直观预订引擎受到好评,并提到其流畅的多语言支持和易用性。然而,一些用户要求改进默认语言设置和界面设计,以提供更好的用户体验。
虽然该平台支持多种支付网关,但用户建议需要扩展支付选项,特别是整合更多的本地和国际网关,以避免连接问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Journey - Booking Engine 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Journey - Booking Engine 提供 5 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 27 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Journey - Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Journey - Booking Engine:否。Roiback | Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Journey 的 HT Score 为 0,ROIBACK 的为 72。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问